CBT for suicide prevention in adolescents

1. Introduction

Version followed: the CBT-SP manual as described in Stanley, Brown, Brent, Wells, Poling, Curry et al. (2009, JAACAP 48(10):1005–1013), the version used in the NIMH Treatment of Adolescent Suicide Attempters (TASA) study (NCT00080158). The safety-plan steps follow the later published form of the same plan (Stanley & Brown 2012, Safety Planning Intervention), which the authors say was adapted for adolescents in CBT-SP. The full treatment manual is unpublished, and the full text of the 2009 paper is not drawn on. Session-level detail beyond the abstract, the NIMH summary and secondary sources is therefore marked [uncertain].

CBT-SP is a manualised, individual-plus-family cognitive-behavioural treatment for adolescents (13–19 in TASA) who have recently attempted suicide, usually in the context of depression. The authors describe it as built on a "risk reduction and relapse prevention approach", grounded in CBT and DBT principles and in targeted therapies for depressed suicidal youth [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract]. The working model is stress–diathesis: a suicidal act follows a chain of triggers, vulnerabilities, thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Change comes from three things: (a) mapping that chain for this adolescent's own attempt, (b) installing a safety plan and building hope to get through the high-risk early weeks, and (c) teaching the specific cognitive, behavioural, emotional and family skills that would break the chain at its weak links. Relapse-prevention work then rehearses using those skills in a future crisis [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; NIMH 2009; Magellan slides; CMI].

Intended population: adolescents with a suicide attempt in roughly the past 90 days, or with a severe ideation episode with identifiable precipitants. CBT-SP is usually delivered alongside medication management for depression [source: NIMH 2009; Magellan slides; CMI]. The Child Mind Institute notes it is generally not the first choice for youth with continuous, unremitting suicidal thinking or complex trauma, where DBT-A or trauma-focused work may fit better [source: CMI].

2. Framework

Format [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; CMI; NIMH 2009]:

Two phases: an acute phase and a continuation phase, each about 12 sessions. The acute phase runs about 12 weeks (in TASA, 12 or more sessions were completed by 72.4% of 110 treated teens). The continuation phase follows, and many TASA participants dropped out during it.
Mainly weekly individual sessions with the adolescent, plus sessions that include parents or caregivers. Total duration is about 3–6 months.
Exact session length, continuation-phase spacing (for example fortnightly or monthly), the number of required family sessions, and whether the early weeks had extra contact are in the full text, which is not drawn on [uncertain]. NIMH's lesson from TASA was to front-load intensity. Ten of the 24 new suicidal events occurred within the first 4 weeks, so the authors recommended emphasising safety planning and more intensive therapy early [source: NIMH 2009]. A practical reading: consider twice-weekly contact or added phone check-ins in weeks 1–4 [synthesis].

The paper's section headings name three stages: "Initial Phase of Acute Treatment", "Middle Phase of Acute Treatment" and "End of Acute Treatment and Continuation Phase" [source: Stanley et al. 2009, contents list seen via em-consulte].

Phase A: Initial phase of acute treatment (about sessions 1–3; exact count [uncertain])

Goals: establish safety and engagement, and understand the attempt.
Core tasks: chain analysis of the index suicidal event; collaborative safety plan, including means restriction with parents; psychoeducation for teen and family about suicidal behaviour, its link to depression and the treatment goals; building reasons for living and hope; and a case conceptualisation that picks the skills to target [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; CMI; Stanley & Brown 2012].
Move on when: a written safety plan exists and the teen says they are likely to use it; parents have completed means restriction; the chain is mapped well enough to name the main triggers and vulnerabilities; and you and the teen agree on a skills focus. The manual's formal criteria were not seen [uncertain]; these criteria are [synthesis] from the stated phase goals.

Phase B: Middle phase of acute treatment (about sessions 4–10 [uncertain])

Goals: build skills chosen from the conceptualisation, not delivered in a fixed order. The CMI summary describes exercises "tailored to the child".
Content: individual skills (cognitive restructuring, behavioural activation, problem solving, emotion regulation and distress tolerance; interpersonal skills [uncertain]) and family skills (family problem solving and communication). The safety plan is reviewed and revised every session [source: CMI; Stanley et al. 2009 abstract lists "skill building", family intervention; NIMH 2009 stresses distress tolerance and the home, school and social environment].
Move on when: the teen can show, in session and in homework, the skills that map onto their chain, and suicidal ideation and depression are trending down. Formal criteria were not seen [uncertain/synthesis].

Phase C: End of acute treatment and the continuation phase (about 12 further sessions)

Goals: relapse prevention and consolidation.
End of acute phase: review progress and the chain; complete a relapse-prevention rehearsal in which the teen imagines the attempt sequence and a future crisis and works through it using new skills; update the safety plan [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract lists "relapse prevention"; CMI]. The imagery format is drawn from the Brown et al. cognitive therapy for suicide prevention lineage and is not confirmed from the CBT-SP full text [uncertain].
Continuation phase: less frequent sessions to practise, generalise and maintain skills, monitor risk, and deal with new stressors [uncertain on structure].
Ending: risk and the safety plan reviewed, a relapse-prevention rehearsal completed, a clear plan for future help-seeking, and parents briefed on warning signs [synthesis].

Throughout: suicide risk is reassessed at every contact and medication is coordinated with the prescriber [source: NIMH 2009 on combined treatment; synthesis on the procedure]. The authors' training and supervision arrangements were not found. The codebook notes say "clinicians trained to the manual; details unclear" [uncertain].

3. Guiding principles

Source tags: [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; CMI; Stanley & Brown 2012; NIMH 2009], except where marked.

Suicide-specific focus. Treat suicidal behaviour as the primary target, not only a symptom of depression. Each session links back to the suicidal chain and the safety plan, not just mood.
Risk reduction and relapse prevention. The aim is to lower the chance of another attempt. Ask of every intervention which link in the chain it weakens.
Stress–diathesis case formulation. Look for both the acute triggers (rejection, loss, criticism, conflict) and the standing vulnerabilities (hopelessness, depression, abuse history, family conflict, prior attempts). Address both.
Chain-driven tailoring. Skills are picked from the individual chain analysis, not delivered in a fixed order. Choose the next module by asking where this teen's chain is most breakable.
Safety first, early and concrete. Install the safety plan and means restriction in the first sessions. The first 4 weeks are highest risk, so be most intensive then [source: NIMH 2009].
Collaboration. Build the plan and formulation with the teen, in their words. Suggest, but never hand over a generic list [source: Stanley & Brown 2012].
CBT and DBT integration. Use cognitive restructuring and behavioural tools alongside DBT-style chain analysis, distress tolerance and emotion regulation. Use DBT-type validation and acceptance alongside change work [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; validation emphasis is synthesis].
Family as part of treatment. Parents are allies in monitoring, means restriction, reinforcing skills and reducing conflict. Family conflict predicted recurrence and cohesion protected, so target the home climate directly [source: NIMH 2009; CMI].
Hope as a target. Hopelessness predicts recurrence, so build reasons for living and hope deliberately, not just as a by-product [source: NIMH 2009; CMI].
The safety plan is not therapy for root problems. It gives concrete steps for getting through a crisis, and underlying problems are worked on elsewhere in treatment [source: CMI].
Ongoing risk monitoring and adaptation. Revise the plan as skills, risks and supports change, and reassess at each contact [source: Stanley & Brown 2012].
Structured, goal-oriented sessions. Use an agenda, review homework, practise skills and set new homework. A teen who cannot tolerate structure may need another model [source: CMI; agenda format is standard CBT, synthesis].

4. Intervention inventory

The published abstract names these components: chain analysis of the suicidal event, safety plan development, skill building, psychoeducation, family intervention and relapse prevention [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract]. The individual skills listed below come from the CMI and NIMH summaries. The exact module list and order in the unpublished manual were not seen [uncertain]. All example language is illustrative and is not manual wording.

4.1 Session structure and risk check (every session)

Purpose: keep sessions focused on suicide risk and skills, and catch rising risk early.
Steps:
1. Brief check-in on suicidal ideation, urges, any self-harm or attempts, and mood since last session.
2. Check whether the safety plan was used, and how.
3. Set the agenda together.
4. Review homework.
5. Do the main work (chain analysis, a skill or family work).
6. Assign homework tied to the skill.
7. Summarise and ask for feedback.
8. If risk has risen, do a full risk assessment and update the safety plan before any other work.
[source: CMI "structured, goal-oriented"; standard CBT format, synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "Before we set today's agenda, let's check in. Since Tuesday, have you had any thoughts of killing yourself or hurting yourself? Did you use any part of your safety plan?"
Watch for: minimising ("I'm fine") after recent high-risk stressors; parent and teen reports that don't match. Signs it is working: the teen starts raising urges and plan use without prompting.

4.2 Chain analysis of the suicidal event

Purpose: map the sequence that led to the recent attempt (or severe ideation) so that triggers, vulnerabilities and breakable links become targets. This is the first core task and drives the case conceptualisation [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; CMI].
Steps [source: CMI for content; step order is synthesis in the DBT chain-analysis style]:
1. Explain the purpose: understand what happened, not judge it.
2. Ask the teen to tell the story from a starting point well before the attempt (the day before or the morning of), through the act and what happened afterwards.
3. Slow it down link by link, covering:
  - external events (who said or did what);
  - physical state (tired, hungry, hot, unwell, using substances);
  - environment (who and what was available or unavailable, time of day, being alone);
  - thoughts, including the exact words;
  - emotions and their intensity;
  - actions.
4. Find the point where passive thoughts ("I don't want to be here") turned into active intent and steps toward self-harm. CMI calls this the key question.
5. Explore what the teen expected to happen (escape, relief, others' reactions) and how they felt about what actually happened.
6. Note the consequences afterwards, including family responses, which may maintain the pattern.
7. Name trigger categories, which are often rejection, loss or criticism. Note times of heightened risk (night, alone, bored) [source: CMI].
8. Mark two or three links where a different thought, action or support could have broken the chain. These become skills targets and safety-plan warning signs.
9. Write or draw the chain together, and keep a copy for later sessions.
Example language (illustrative): "Let's go back to the morning of that day. Walk me through it like a film, frame by frame. What was the first thing that made the day feel bad?" Then: "At what moment did 'I wish I wasn't here' turn into actually doing something?"
Watch for: shame and shutting down (slow down, validate, take breaks); dissociative gaps (accept gaps and fill from other sources); escalating distress (pause and use a coping step). Signs it is working: the teen can name specific triggers and recognise the same pattern in new events. If the attempt is very recent and the teen is flooded, do a brief version first and complete it over two sessions [synthesis].

4.3 Safety plan (collaborative, written, prioritised)

Purpose: give the teen a stepwise written plan to use when warning signs appear. It is installed in the initial phase and revised throughout. CBT-SP's safety plan is the adolescent adaptation of the Stanley–Brown Safety Planning Intervention [source: Stanley & Brown 2012; Stanley et al. 2009 abstract].
Steps (paraphrased from Stanley & Brown 2012):
1. Warning signs: use the chain analysis to list the teen's specific situations, thoughts, moods and behaviours that come before a crisis. Specific signs prompt use better than vague ones.
2. Internal coping strategies: things the teen can do alone to take their mind off the crisis (music, a game, a shower, deep breathing, drawing). Rank them, easiest or most likely to work first. If the teen doubts one, find others.
3. People and social settings that distract: friends or places where the teen can be around others without disclosing the crisis. Avoid settings with alcohol or drugs.
4. People the teen can ask for help: family or other trusted adults the teen is willing to tell about the crisis. For adolescents, choose calming adults and avoid relatives who are often in conflict with the teen. Weigh the pros and cons of telling each person. Agree how the teen will signal (a code word, a text from another room, a sign on the door) [source: CMI for signalling].
5. Professionals and agencies: therapist, after-hours line, the nearest emergency department that treats youth, and crisis lines (in the US, 988). Discuss fears such as hospitalisation, and list only contacts the teen will actually use. Plan transport and care for siblings [source: CMI].
6. Making the environment safe: agree what will be secured or removed, by whom and for how long. Do this last, so the teen has already seen the alternatives. Always ask about firearms. See 4.4.
7. Check likelihood of use: ask how likely the teen is to use the plan, which parts help most, and what might get in the way. Problem-solve barriers and role-play if time allows.
8. Distribution: the teen keeps the original (paper, phone photo, a wallet copy). A copy goes in the record, and parents get their part with the teen's agreement.
9. Review each session: was it used, what worked, what to change.
Some versions of the safety plan add a "reasons for living" line [uncertain whether in CBT-SP]. Hope work is in 4.6.
Example language (illustrative): "This plan won't fix everything that's hard right now. It's a set of steps for getting through the worst moments. Let's write it in your words. What's usually the first sign, the very first thing you notice, when things start to slide?"
Watch for: generic or parent-dictated entries; contacts the teen would never actually call; a plan kept somewhere they cannot reach in a crisis. Signs it is working: the teen reports using specific steps and the steps get refined over time.

4.4 Means restriction with parents (lethal-means counselling)

Purpose: reduce access to lethal means at home during the high-risk period [source: Stanley & Brown 2012; CMI].
Steps:
1. Ask the teen and parents separately and together what means are accessible. Ask about firearms routinely.
2. Explain that crises are often short and that delay and distance save lives [synthesis consistent with SPI rationale].
3. Agree concrete actions:
  - firearms stored off-site, or locked and unloaded by an adult, and never handled by the teen;
  - medications (including over-the-counter) locked or dispensed by a parent;
  - sharp objects secured;
  - access to windows and roofs restricted where relevant.
4. Write down who does what, by when and for how long.
5. Confirm completion at the next session.
6. Note that removing one method does not remove risk, because of possible method substitution, so continue the full plan [source: Stanley & Brown 2012].
Example language (illustrative, to parents): "The most protective thing you can do this week is put time and distance between your daughter and anything she could use to hurt herself. Let's go room by room."
Watch for: parents who feel blamed or think it is unnecessary; partial compliance; firearms the family is reluctant to remove (offer temporary off-site storage options). Signs it is working: confirmed, specific changes at home.

4.5 Psychoeducation (teen and family)

Purpose: give a shared understanding of suicidal behaviour, its link with depression and other disorders, the CBT-SP model and treatment goals [source: CMI; Stanley et al. 2009 abstract].
Steps:
1. Use the teen's chain to explain the trigger, vulnerability, thought, feeling and action model.
2. Explain depression's effect on thinking (hopelessness, tunnel vision) and that suicidal states rise and fall.
3. Explain the treatment plan: phases, the role of skills and of parents, and medication if prescribed.
4. Teach parents the warning signs and how to respond calmly.
5. Invite questions and correct myths, for example that asking about suicide plants the idea [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "When someone is depressed, the mind narrows. Problems feel permanent and the options seem to shrink. Part of what we'll do is widen those options back out."
Watch for: parental anger or blame ("attention-seeking"), or guilt. Address these in a parent-only segment if needed. Signs it is working: parents can name warning signs and the plan.

4.6 Reasons for living and the hope kit

Purpose: counter hopelessness, a major predictor of recurrence, by building concrete reasons to live and reminders of them [source: CMI; NIMH 2009].
Steps [source: CMI; the hope kit originates in Brown/Wenzel cognitive therapy, its CBT-SP use is described by CMI]:
1. Ask about reasons for living (people, pets, future plans, things they would miss) and about anything that could change, such as a school change.
2. Write them down.
3. Invite the teen to make a hope kit, a physical box or a phone folder of photos, mementos, letters, songs and reminders of good times.
4. Review it in session.
5. Link it to the safety plan as a step the teen can take.
6. Add to it over time.
Example language (illustrative): "When you're in that dark place, it's hard to remember anything good. Let's build something you can open in those moments. What would you put in it?"
Watch for: reasons that are actually burdens ("so my mum doesn't suffer") rather than sources of meaning. Accept these, but look for more. Expect early ambivalence. Signs it is working: the teen adds items on their own and uses the kit in crises.

4.7 Case conceptualisation and skill selection

Purpose: turn the chain analysis and assessment into a formulation that picks which skills to teach and in what order [source: CMI "tailored"; Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; manual selection procedure [uncertain]].
Steps:
1. Summarise the vulnerabilities (depression, hopelessness, abuse history, prior attempts, family conflict, substance use) and the proximal triggers.
2. For each breakable link, name the deficit: for example, thinking errors leading to hopeless thoughts, withdrawal and inactivity, poor problem solving, being overwhelmed by emotion, or family conflict.
3. Map each deficit to a module (4.8–4.13).
4. Agree the first two or three modules with the teen, and with parents for family work.
5. Draw the formulation and share it.
6. Revisit it at mid-treatment [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Looking at your chain, two places stand out: when you start thinking 'nobody cares', and when you shut yourself in your room. Shall we work on those first?"
Watch for: choosing skills by habit instead of by chain; too many targets at once. Signs it is working: the teen can see why each skill matters.

4.8 Cognitive restructuring (suicide-related and depressive thoughts)

Purpose: weaken the hopeless, self-critical or "burden" thoughts that drive the chain toward action. The use of CBT principles is stated in the abstract. The specific procedure below is standard CBT and was not confirmed from the manual [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; CMI "teach ways to counter those thoughts"; steps are synthesis/uncertain].
Steps:
1. Teach the link between situation, thought, feeling and action, using a link from the teen's own chain.
2. Catch automatic thoughts, using a thought record as homework.
3. Name common thinking traps (all-or-nothing, mind-reading, catastrophising, "nothing will change").
4. Examine the evidence and look for alternatives with Socratic questions.
5. Write a balanced coping statement.
6. Put the best coping statements on the safety plan or a coping card.
7. For deeper beliefs ("I'm unlovable", "I'm a burden"), look for patterns across chains and test them with behavioural experiments.
Example language (illustrative): "When the group chat went quiet, the thought was 'they all hate me'. What else could explain the silence? If a friend told you that, what would you say to them?"
Watch for: intellectual agreement that doesn't shift feelings (try experiments and use imagery); invalidating real adversity (validate first, then look for options). Signs it is working: the teen can generate alternatives in the moment, and hopelessness scores fall.

4.9 Behavioural activation

Purpose: reverse withdrawal and inactivity, which deepen depression and isolation (for example, staying in bed and avoiding friends) [source: CMI].
Steps:
1. Monitor activity and mood for a week.
2. Note the link between inactivity and low mood.
3. List pleasant and mastery activities the teen actually values.
4. Schedule small, specific activities, rising in difficulty.
5. Review the effect on mood.
6. Problem-solve barriers.
7. Plan extra activities around known high-risk days and times [source: CMI; procedural detail is standard BA, synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Let's pick one thing for Saturday afternoon, the time you said is hardest. Something small you used to like. When and where exactly?"
Watch for: plans that are too ambitious; parents imposing activities. Signs it is working: more activity, mood ratings rising after activities, and fewer "alone and bored" windows in later chains.

4.10 Problem solving

Purpose: give alternatives when the teen sees suicide as the only solution to an interpersonal or practical problem. CMI gives the example of finding other social options after being excluded [source: CMI; standard problem-solving steps, synthesis].
Steps:
1. Define the problem concretely.
2. Brainstorm options without judging them.
3. Weigh the pros and cons of each.
4. Choose one and plan it.
5. Try it.
6. Review the outcome and revise.
7. Practise first on a problem from the chain, then on current problems.
Example language (illustrative): "Right now it feels like there are only two options: put up with it or disappear. Let's list every option, even silly ones, before we judge any of them."
Watch for: "yes, but" responses (first validate how hard the problem is) and problems that really are outside the teen's control (move to acceptance and distress tolerance). Signs it is working: the teen starts producing options without prompting.

4.11 Emotion regulation and distress tolerance

Purpose: ride out intense emotion without acting on suicidal urges. This draws on DBT principles. NIMH specifically recommended building distress tolerance after TASA [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; NIMH 2009; CMI].
Steps (specific skill set in the manual [uncertain]; the following are standard DBT- and CBT-style tools):
1. Teach the teen to rate emotion on a 0–100 scale and spot rising intensity early, linking this to safety-plan warning signs.
2. Teach short-term tolerance skills: distraction, self-soothing with the senses, paced breathing or relaxation, changing the setting.
3. Build a personal coping kit and a coping space at home, with favourite coping items easy to reach [source: CMI].
4. Practise in session at moderate arousal, for example while recalling a mild stressor.
5. Add longer-term regulation habits: sleep, routine and reducing substance use.
6. Add the skills that work best to step 2 of the safety plan.
Example language (illustrative): "On a scale of 0 to 100, where are you when the urge first shows up? Let's practise something you can do at 40, before it gets to 80."
Watch for: skills tried only once at peak intensity and then judged useless; self-harm used as a regulation tool (add it to the chain and target it). Signs it is working: urges peak lower and pass without action.

4.12 Interpersonal and communication skills (individual) [uncertain]

Purpose: reduce the interpersonal triggers that often start the chain (rejection, conflict). Whether a separate individual interpersonal module exists in the manual was not confirmed [uncertain]. Communication work is confirmed at family level [source: CMI].
Steps [synthesis]:
1. Pick a recurring interpersonal trigger from the chain.
2. Teach clear, assertive requests and how to say no.
3. Role-play the conversation.
4. Plan when and where to use it.
5. Review how it went.
Example language (illustrative): "Let's practise what you could say to Sam next time. First I'll be Sam, then you."
Watch for: unsafe relationships, such as bullying, where the answer is environmental change rather than better skills.

4.13 Family sessions: problem solving and communication

Purpose: reduce family conflict (which predicted recurrence) and increase support and cohesion (which protected) [source: NIMH 2009; CMI; Stanley et al. 2009 abstract "family intervention"].
Steps [source: CMI for content; structure is synthesis; number of family sessions [uncertain]]:
1. Meet the parents alone briefly to hear their concerns and prepare them.
2. Hold a joint session: agree one conflict topic (for example curfew or phone use, since the CMI example chain starts with a confiscated phone).
3. Teach listening and reflecting, "I" statements and calm requests, and role-play these.
4. Go through family problem solving on that topic (define it, brainstorm, choose, plan, review).
5. Agree how the family will respond to warning signs.
6. Assign a home practice task.
7. Review it at the next family session.
Example language (illustrative): "Let's take the phone rules as our practice problem. Each of you, in one sentence, what matters most to you about it? I'll check I've understood before anyone replies."
Watch for: escalation in session (stop, take separate time, then return); a scapegoated teen; disclosure of abuse (follow mandatory reporting duties, see section 5). Signs it is working: fewer and shorter conflicts, and the teen naming parents as a source of help.

4.14 Parent coaching: monitoring and support

Purpose: help parents monitor warning signs, reinforce skills and plan support around triggers without becoming intrusive or avoidant [source: CMI].
Steps:
1. Share the teen's warning signs and the signal agreed on the safety plan.
2. Plan extra support before known stressors (for example, results day or school breaks), such as one-to-one time or enjoyable activities. Avoidance of stressors is not the goal.
3. Prompt the teen to use the plan and skills.
4. Coach a calm, confident, supportive response to disclosure. CMI's advice: "Be understanding, be confident, and know your safety plan."
5. Keep means restriction in place.
6. Agree when parents should call the therapist or emergency services.
Example language (illustrative): "If she uses the code word, your job isn't to fix it or ask why. Stay with her, stay calm, and open the plan together."
Watch for: over-monitoring that becomes control; parents' own distress or depression (consider referring them for their own support [synthesis]).

4.15 Relapse-prevention rehearsal (end of acute phase)

Purpose: check and strengthen the teen's ability to use new skills in a future suicidal crisis, before ending the acute phase. Relapse prevention is a named CBT-SP component [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; CMI]. The guided-imagery format below follows the related cognitive therapy for suicide prevention lineage (Brown, Wenzel), and its exact CBT-SP form was not confirmed [uncertain].
Steps:
1. Prepare: explain the purpose, get consent, and agree a stop signal and grounding plan.
2. Ask the teen to imagine the events leading up to the attempt in the present tense, with thoughts and feelings, at a manageable level of detail. Do not rehearse the method itself.
3. Debrief.
4. Imagine the same sequence again, this time using the skills and safety-plan steps at the key links.
5. Imagine a plausible future high-risk situation and work through it using the skills.
6. Debrief and ground, and check current risk before the teen leaves.
7. If the teen cannot produce coping responses, do more skills work before moving on, and rerun the rehearsal later [synthesis/uncertain on manual rule].
Example language (illustrative): "Imagine it's that evening again. You're in your room and the message has just come in. What are you noticing? … Now let's run it again. This time, at the moment you think 'nobody cares', what do you do?"
Watch for: rising suicidal ideation after the exercise. Do not run it in an acute crisis; ensure the safety plan is current, and schedule follow-up contact within a day or two if distress is high [synthesis]. Signs it is working: the teen spontaneously inserts specific skills at several links.

4.16 Continuation-phase consolidation and termination planning

Purpose: maintain gains, generalise skills and prevent relapse over the following months [source: Stanley et al. 2009 abstract; specific content [uncertain]].
Steps [synthesis]:
1. Space sessions further apart.
2. At each session, review risk, the plan, and new stressors.
3. Run a mini chain analysis on any setback.
4. Practise the skills that matter most.
5. Update the safety plan and hope kit.
6. Anticipate high-risk dates (anniversaries of the attempt, exams, transitions).
7. Agree a written plan for after therapy, with re-entry routes.
Example language (illustrative): "The anniversary of your attempt is in March. Let's plan that week now."
Watch for: dropout, which was common in TASA's continuation phase [source: NIMH 2009]. Agree the reasons for continuing at the end of the acute phase, and use flexible scheduling.

5. Handling problems

The sources give only TASA's risk findings and the safety-plan tips. Most guidance below is [synthesis] from standard CBT, DBT and adolescent suicide-prevention practice, and is marked as such.

New suicidal event early in treatment (the commonest TASA problem). In TASA, 24 of 124 participants had a new event in 6 months, 10 of them within 4 weeks of starting [source: NIMH 2009].
- Expect early events and front-load safety work. Consider twice-weekly sessions or phone check-ins in month 1 [source: NIMH 2009 "more intensive" early; specifics synthesis].
- After any event: assess current risk and decide the level of care (outpatient, intensive outpatient, emergency evaluation or admission) using your service's standard risk protocol.
- Then run a new chain analysis of the event and revise the safety plan at the link that failed.
- Present this as information, not failure [synthesis].
Highest-risk profiles. Recurrence was predicted by high ideation and depression, abuse history, two or more prior attempts, high hopelessness and family conflict [source: NIMH 2009]. For these teens:
- give priority early to hope work (4.6) and family conflict work (4.13);
- coordinate closely with the prescriber;
- for abuse history, add trauma-informed coping strategies, and consider referral for trauma-focused treatment once the teen is stable [source: NIMH 2009 recommends coping strategies for trauma; referral is synthesis].
Overwhelm during chain analysis or the relapse-prevention rehearsal [synthesis].
- Titrate: give less detail and more breaks.
- Ground the teen (orienting to the room, paced breathing).
- Use a stop signal agreed in advance.
- Finish with a safety-plan review and a check of current risk.
- Split the task across sessions, and postpone the rehearsal if the teen is in active crisis.
Minimising or denial ("it was a mistake", "I'm over it") [synthesis].
- Don't argue.
- Use curiosity about the chain ("what was happening for you that day?").
- Draw on collateral information from parents or ED records.
- Frame the work as preventing a repeat of whatever made life that painful.
- Keep the safety plan in place regardless.
Not using the safety plan.
- Check whether the plan is specific, in the teen's own words and kept somewhere accessible.
- Find out which step failed and why.
- Replace strategies the teen doubts, and role-play using the plan [source: Stanley & Brown 2012 on likelihood-of-use and barriers; specifics synthesis].
Homework non-completion [synthesis].
- Shrink the task and make it phone-based where possible.
- Begin the homework in session.
- Link it explicitly to the teen's own goals.
- Ask about barriers (shame, parents checking it, privacy).
- Review whatever was done without judging what wasn't.
Hopelessness that blocks engagement ("nothing will help") [synthesis].
- Validate the pain.
- Treat the belief as a symptom to test, not a fact.
- Use small behavioural experiments and the hope kit.
- Point to concrete changes that are possible, such as a school change [source: CMI].
Parent non-engagement, blame or high conflict [synthesis].
- Offer parent-only time to hear their fear and anger.
- Reframe "attention-seeking" as an attempt to communicate unbearable distress.
- Keep means restriction non-negotiable.
- If joint sessions escalate, coach each side separately before meeting together.
- If a parent is a source of harm, safety and reporting take priority over family work.
Confidentiality tensions [synthesis].
- Agree at the start, with teen and parents, what will be shared: risk to life is always shared, and other content is private by default.
- Tell the teen before contacting parents whenever possible.
Disclosure of abuse or ongoing danger.
- Follow your jurisdiction's mandatory reporting and safeguarding procedures.
- Re-assess whether home is safe before relying on parents in the safety plan [synthesis].
Ruptures (the teen feels judged, controlled or "hospital-threatened") [synthesis].
- Name the rupture and own your part.
- Ask what felt wrong.
- Explain the reason for safety actions honestly.
- Involve the teen in decisions where possible.
- Discuss fear of hospitalisation openly; this is also a safety-plan step [source: Stanley & Brown 2012].
Dropout, especially in the continuation phase. Many TASA participants stopped during continuation [source: NIMH 2009]. In response [synthesis]:
- agree the reasons to continue before the acute phase ends;
- offer flexible or telehealth sessions;
- follow up missed sessions the same day with a call or text plus a risk check;
- send caring contacts after dropout;
- leave the door open with a clear re-entry route.
Structure doesn't fit, or chronic unremitting ideation or complex trauma. CBT-SP's structure may not suit these teens [source: CMI]. Consider DBT-A or another more intensive or longer-term model, and say so openly.
Substance use in the chain [synthesis].
- Include intoxication as a link and as a warning sign.
- Keep substance-using settings out of safety-plan step 3 [source: Stanley & Brown 2012].
- Add substance-focused work or refer.
Medication-related issues [synthesis].
- Coordinate with the prescriber, and ask about side effects, adherence and any worsening agitation or ideation after medication changes.
- Have parents secure and dispense medications (4.4).
Clinician anxiety [synthesis].
- Use regular consultation or supervision, and document risk assessments and plans.
- Don't let fear drive control-based responses that rupture the alliance.

Sources

Sources:

Further reading (not drawn on): the full text at PMC2888910, Europe PMC, ResearchGate, and the TASA ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00080158.

Published works cited:

Stanley, B., Brown, G., Brent, D. A., Wells, K., Poling, K., Curry, J., et al. (2009). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for suicide prevention (CBT-SP): Treatment model, feasibility, and acceptability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(10), 1005–1013.
Stanley, B., & Brown, G. K. (2012). Safety Planning Intervention: A brief intervention to mitigate suicide risk. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19, 256–264.
Wenzel, A., Brown, G. K., & Beck, A. T. (2009). Cognitive Therapy for Suicidal Patients: Scientific and Clinical Applications. APA. (Background for the hope kit and relapse-prevention imagery lineage; not drawn on [uncertain].)
Stanley, B., Brown, G., Brent, D., et al. (unpublished). CBT-SP treatment manual (TASA). Not available [uncertain].

← Previous · II-128Brief cognitive behavioural therapy for suicide prevention Next · II-130 →Cognitive therapy for suicide prevention