Guide IV-013

Somaterapia

Roberto Freire1970São Paulo, Brazil
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: Roberto Freire's Soma (Somaterapia) as he described it in Soma: uma terapia anarquista (vol. 1, 1988; vol. 2, 1991; vol. 3 with João da Mata, 1993) and Eu é um outro (2002), as these books are quoted in academic papers. The guide also follows the group format used by Freire's successors (the Coletivo Anarquista Brancaleone and Tesão – Casa da Soma, São Paulo) as described in 2004–2018 accounts. The exercise sequence follows Ogo & Dejerk (2008), the most detailed practitioner-side account available. [source: Redalyc historical study; Sala Preta article; Boletim Brancaleone; Ogo & Dejerk 2008] [uncertain: Freire's own procedures are known here only through secondary quotation; no authorised full text of his books is available online.]

What it is. Soma is a group method created in Brazil in the 1970s by the psychiatrist and writer Roberto Freire (1927–2008). He is not Paulo Freire. The method grew out of four years of exercise research with actors at the Centro de Estudos Macunaíma in São Paulo (Myriam Muniz, Sylvio Zilber), out of the Living Theatre's Paradise Now, and out of the work of Reich, Perls/Gestalt therapy, Bateson, Laing/Cooper's antipsychiatry, Lowen and Thomas Hanna. Capoeira Angola was added later. [source: Wikipedia; Sala Preta, citing Freire 1991 pp. 50–57; Redalyc pp. 212–222] One account dates its beginnings to the mid-1960s. [uncertain: Liss 2006] Most sources place it in the 1970s.

It is a programme, not a single therapy. Soma is a time-limited group process lasting about 18 months, built around a sequence of body exercises. Freire himself denied that it was a psychotherapy in the usual sense. He also called it somapedagogia, and later writers describe it as a free course or "pedagogy" rather than clinical care. [source: Redalyc pp. 221–223; Psicorporal p. 54; Slingshot] Proponents call it "neither clinical nor confessional". [source: Slingshot]

Core idea of change. In Freire's view, neurosis is a socio-political problem, "a problem of incompetence for living" rather than an illness. Following Reich, he held that this problem is lodged in the body as chronic muscular tension, the "neuromuscular armour". [source: Verve 2017 interview pp. 154–155] Playful, theatre-derived body exercises loosen this armour and release blocked creativity. [source: Sala Preta, citing Freire 2002 p. 285] A self-managed group then works as a "micro-social laboratory" for non-authoritarian relating. [source: p2p wiki] Through this, participants move from an "ideology of sacrifice" towards an "ideology of pleasure" (tesão) and discover their own originalidade, meaning their unique mix of potentials. [source: Boletim Brancaleone; Verve pp. 162–163] Energy terms such as "bioenergy", "armour" and "tesão flowing" are the school's own theory, taken from Reich. They are not established physiology. Soma is not a treatment for any physical disease.

2. Framework

Format [source: Sala Preta citing Freire 2002 p. 285; Eloff 2018; Wikipedia; Slingshot; Ogo & Dejerk 2008 p. 7; Boletim Brancaleone]

  • Closed group of about 20 participants. [source: Eloff 2018]
  • Therapist-led sessions are held four times a month (weekly) and last about 3 hours. Roughly the first half is a body exercise and the second half is the leitura do exercício, the group's "reading" of what was felt. Ogo & Dejerk describe three parts: exercise, Reading, Wrap-up.
  • Length is about 18 months. Eloff counts about 40 sessions. The Boletim Brancaleone says about one year. [uncertain: lengths differ by account. Use 12–18 months.]
  • Other parts of the programme: frequent capoeira angola classes, study sessions, group meetings without the therapist, shared social activities and collective work, about one full-group weekend per month, experiences in nature, and two trips the group organises itself. Near the end comes a period of "autonomous life" defined by the group. [source: Wikipedia; Slingshot; Boletim Brancaleone]
  • Entry: an open introductory session (vivência aberta). Freire also ran weekend "Soma marathons" in new cities to found groups, then handed them to young coordinators whom he supervised. [source: Boletim Brancaleone; Verve p. 153] [uncertain: neither source describes what happens in these.]
  • Who it is not for: the practice "doesn't work with schizophrenics or people in advanced states of emotional unbalance". [source: Slingshot; p2p wiki]

Exercise sequence. Freire created "more than 40 exercises" to be run in a set order. The early exercises are introductory. Later ones have stronger "bioenergetic" effects and work on character armour. [source: Ogo & Dejerk 2008 p. 4] The exercises fall into themes of creativity, affectivity, socialisation and aggressiveness [source: Boletim Brancaleone], and of aggressiveness, communication and sensuality [source: Mnemosine p. 235]. A 2021 journal article, by contrast, describes Soma as having no preset method or circuit [source: Pessoa, Simião & Mantuano 2021], so how fixed the order is in current groups is unclear. The full list and order are published only in Freire's volumes and are not reproduced in secondary sources. [uncertain]

Phases. The sources do not label formal phases. The working division below is the writer's reading of their descriptions. [synthesis]

PhaseGoalContentMove on when
A. Entry (1–2 contacts)Inform, screen, consentOpen session; explain why, for what and how you work (Freire's ethical requirement); exclusion screeningPerson understands the ideological and body nature of the work and opts in [synthesis]
B. Group formation (about months 1–4)Safety, play, contactIntroductory exercises (walking and looking, play); start capoeira; first meetings without the therapistMembers report sensations in the readings without interpreting; group norms on stopping are in use [synthesis]
C. Armour work (about months 4–12)Loosen chronic tension, see one's patterns ("bandeiras") in the groupStronger exercises (lifting, passing, trust); study sessions; metacommunicationMembers name their own patterns in the readings; group handles conflict without the therapist [synthesis]
D. Autonomy (about months 12–18)Self-management, carry-over to lifeSelf-organised trips, autonomous-life period, collective projectsPlanned end at the agreed date. Capoeira can continue afterwards. [source: Verve p. 155]

3. Guiding principles

  • Neurosis is socio-political, not a disease [source: Verve pp. 154–155]. In practice, frame difficulties as learned ways of living under authority, not as pathology, and make no diagnoses in the group.
  • Soma = the whole person (after Hanna; body, mind, emotion and social action as one) [source: Redalyc p. 222; Slingshot]. In practice, work through the body and the group, not through talk alone.
  • Armour is where social repression lives (Reich's theory, as Freire held it) [source: Verve p. 155; Ogo & Dejerk pp. 6–7]. In practice, read tension, holding and avoidance in movement as information. Do not attack it.
  • Pleasure over sacrifice; tesão [source: Boletim Brancaleone; Verve pp. 157, 162–163; Eloff]. In practice, exercises should be playful and enjoyable. Ask what gave pleasure as well as what blocked it.
  • Originality [source: Boletim Brancaleone; Verve pp. 154–155]. In practice, the aim is for each person to become more themselves, never to fit a norm the group or the therapist sets.
  • Do not try to change personality structure. Freire called that "impossible, very dangerous and unnecessary". [source: Verve p. 154] In practice, aim at freer use of what the person already is.
  • Self-regulation [source: Slingshot; Ogo & Dejerk p. 7]. In practice, the person decides how far to go, and the group builds conditions in which people can regulate themselves.
  • Anarchism and self-management (autogestão): consensus-based, non-hierarchical groups [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 7; Boletim Brancaleone]. In practice, the group runs its own meetings, trips and decisions, and the therapist does not decide for it.
  • Make the ideology explicit; ethics above method. The therapist must tell the client "why, for what and how" they practise. [source: Mnemosine pp. 232, 236] In practice, state the political frame openly at intake. Do not slip it in.
  • Participant as agent, not patient [source: Boletim Brancaleone]. In practice, use language of participation, not of treatment.
  • Therapist as a non-authoritarian member. One account says the therapist "participates equally" and "does not draw conclusions or make analysis". [source: Liss 2006] Another says the therapist gives feedback on each person's process and political analysis in the wrap-up. [source: Ogo & Dejerk pp. 5–6] [uncertain: the accounts conflict.] In practice, lead the exercises and offer observations as observations, not interpretations.
  • Describe how, not why (from Gestalt) [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 6; Slingshot]. In practice, keep the readings to sensations, feelings and what happened. Stop rationalising and interpreting.
  • Present, not past ("neither clinical nor confessional") [source: Slingshot]. In practice, work on how the past shows up now in the group. Do not do biographical excavation.
  • "Instructions, not rules": participants may stop at their comfortable limit [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 5]. In practice, every instruction can be declined. The same source also says people are encouraged to go past hesitations, and that tension is handled in section 5.
  • Play and ludicity: exercises come from theatre, dance and children's games [source: Sala Preta; Boletim Brancaleone]. In practice, keep instructions light and game-like.
  • Metacommunication: talk about the interaction itself, to spot and resist paradoxical or manipulative communication (after Bateson) [source: Slingshot; p2p wiki]. In practice, name what is happening between people as it happens.
  • The group as a micro-social laboratory [source: p2p wiki]. In practice, the group's own dynamics (leadership, exclusion, rivalry) are material to work with.
  • Youth and practical competence over erudition: Freire trained young coordinators [source: Verve p. 154]. In practice, practical skill in the exercises matters more than theory. Training and supervision still apply (see the touch safeguards in section 4).

4. Intervention inventory

Scope note. Below are all the procedures that published sources describe. Freire's catalogue has more than 40 exercises [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 4], but only five are described concretely in the available sources: walking and looking, the fast-walk slapping game, the conveyor belt, lifting and carrying, and the trust fall. The rest are named only as categories (creativity, affectivity, socialisation, aggressiveness, communication, sensuality; theatre games, children's games, dance, massage) [source: Boletim Brancaleone; Mnemosine p. 235; Verve p. 155]. None of them has been invented here. [uncertain]

Touch safeguards (apply to every exercise marked TOUCH). Soma relies heavily on group touch, lifting and minimal clothing. The only safeguard the sources state is that instructions are "not rules" and anyone may stop at their limit [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 5]. Every other step below is [synthesis]:

  1. Before the first session, explain in writing that the work involves touch, being lifted and carried, falling into others' arms, and light clothing.
  2. Before each touch exercise, explain it, ask each person, and offer a no-touch role (observer, spotter, music).
  3. Agree a stop signal: the word "stop" or a raised hand halts the exercise at once.
  4. Check in during the exercise and again at the reading.
  5. Clothing is always the participant's choice. Comfortable clothes are the default.
  6. No touch to the face, neck, chest or genital area. Never use sexual touch.
  7. Touch-based group work needs specific training and supervision. Check what your licence and jurisdiction allow, and that your liability insurance covers lifting and group physical work.

Physical screening for lifting, falling and capoeira [synthesis: the sources give none beyond excluding psychosis and acute crisis]:

  • Ask about pregnancy, back or neck problems, osteoporosis, recent injury or surgery, cardiovascular disease, epilepsy, vertigo, and joint hypermobility.
  • Check that the group is strong enough for the person being lifted.
  • On the psychological side, ask about histories of restraint or assault, severe dissociation, psychosis, active suicidality, and recent trauma without stabilisation.

4.1 Intake and the open introductory session (vivência aberta)

  • Purpose: let prospective members try the work and decide; screen. [source: Boletim Brancaleone. The content of the session is not described: uncertain]
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Hold a one-off session with a mild introductory exercise (for example walking and looking, 4.4) and a short reading.
    2. Afterwards, explain the format, length, cost and political frame, and state openly "why, for what and how" you work [source: Mnemosine p. 232].
    3. Screen individually against the exclusions: schizophrenia, advanced emotional crisis [source: Slingshot], plus the physical and psychological screen above.
    4. Obtain written consent covering touch and the group's other activities.
  • Example language (illustrative): "This is a group that works through the body and through play. It also has an openly political view: we think a lot of suffering comes from how we are taught to live under authority. You don't have to share that view, but you should know it's there."
  • Watch for: people who join hoping for individual crisis care. Refer them instead.

4.2 The session structure: exercise, reading, wrap-up

  • Purpose: the basic unit of Soma. A body experience is followed by its verbal "reading" and then a link to social context. [source: Sala Preta, citing Freire 2002 p. 285; Ogo & Dejerk pp. 5–6; Eloff 2018]
  • Steps:
    1. About 3 hours in all [source: Boletim Brancaleone; Sala Preta]. Eloff observed sessions that opened with capoeira.
    2. First half: one exercise from the sequence, led by brief instructions (4.3).
    3. Second half: the reading (4.9) in a seated circle.
    4. Close with the wrap-up (4.10).
  • Example language (illustrative): "We'll play for a while, then sit and talk about what happened in your body. Not why. Just what."
  • Watch for: the exercise eating into reading time. The reading is where the exercise becomes usable, so protect it. [synthesis]

4.3 Instruction delivery during exercises

  • Purpose: keep the experience bodily rather than verbal. [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 5]
  • Steps:
    1. Give one brief instruction.
    2. Let people carry it out for a short time.
    3. Give the next instruction.
    4. Keep talking to a minimum. Instructions are invitations, and anyone can stop at their limit.
    5. The therapist watches the group dynamics and individual patterns, to bring them up later in the reading. [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 4]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Now slow down… Now notice who you're avoiding looking at."
  • Watch for: a person who freezes or withdraws. Quietly check in with them [synthesis].

4.4 Walking and looking (introductory)

  • Purpose: an early exercise that breaks the taboo on looking and being looked at. It brings out embarrassment and nervousness to work on in the reading. [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 5]
  • Steps:
    1. The group walks in a circle around the room.
    2. On instruction, slow down.
    3. Look at each person "from head to toe, front and back".
    4. Anyone may stop another person to look at them more closely.
    5. After a few minutes, end the exercise and go to the reading, where people share what they noticed. The source gives no duration.
    6. The source has participants in minimal clothing (shorts, swimwear or underwear) to expose more skin. Make this optional and default to comfortable clothes. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Keep walking… slower… let yourself really look at people, and let yourself be looked at. If you want a closer look at someone, you can stop in front of them for a moment."
  • Watch for: laughter and nervousness are expected [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 5]. Shame, body-image distress, or a person being looked at against their wish. In that case allow "look at my hands or face only" [synthesis]. It is working when the reading moves from "it was awkward" to specific sensations and what made looking easier or harder.

4.5 Fast walk, shoulder bumping and slap game (TOUCH)

  • Purpose: playful aggressiveness and dodging. It raises energy and often turns euphoric. [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 5]
  • Steps:
    1. From the walk, speed up.
    2. Bump shoulders with others as you pass.
    3. Then try to slap others on the buttocks while avoiding being slapped yourself.
    4. Stop on a signal and go to the reading.
  • Adaptation [synthesis]: buttock slapping touches a sensitive area and can feel sexualised or humiliating. In clinical use, replace it with a tag on the shoulder or upper back, or with a clothes-peg or tail-grabbing game. Agree how hard a tag may be and use a stop word.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Faster now. Bump shoulders as you pass. Now try to tag someone's shoulder without getting tagged yourself. Remember, 'stop' ends it."
  • Watch for: excitement tipping into real aggression, someone being singled out, flinching or freezing (possible trauma response) [synthesis]. In the reading, look at who attacked, who only defended, and who withdrew.

4.6 The conveyor belt (TOUCH, lifting)

  • Purpose: a later, stronger exercise in letting go of holding (neck and jaw tension) and in being supported by the group. [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 6]
  • Setup:
    1. Two lines stand facing the same direction, shoulder to shoulder.
    2. One person is lifted and laid face-up on the participants' flat hands.
  • Steps:
    1. The group passes the person slowly along the lines, in silence.
    2. The person's eyes are closed. They relax the neck, let the head hang back, and keep the jaw loose.
    3. No one touches the head or neck.
    4. At the end of the line, set the person down gently.
    5. Repeat with each volunteer, then go to the reading.
  • Added safety [synthesis]:
    • Screen first, using the screen above.
    • Use enough carriers for the person's weight, at waist height or lower, never overhead, over a mat.
    • Name a spotter at the head end who stays near but does not touch.
    • Lay the person down feet first.
    • Let them sit before standing.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let your head be heavy. Let your jaw go. Nobody will touch your head. If you want to come down, say 'stop' and we'll set you down right away."
  • Watch for: a rigid neck, held breath and open eyes show holding (in Soma's terms, armour). Panic, dizziness or nausea mean stop. It is working when the person softens across the passes and can describe the difference.

4.7 Lifting and carrying one member (TOUCH, lifting)

  • Purpose: being held and moved by the group. It brings up strong bodily and emotional reactions for the group to read. [source: Eloff 2018]
  • Steps (as reported):
    1. One member is lifted above the group's shoulders.
    2. They are carried around the room and told to relax.
    3. Set them down, then the group "reads" how pleasure flowed or did not flow, within and between members.
  • Added safety [synthesis]: overhead lifting carries real fall risk. In clinical settings, carry at waist height (as in 4.6), with enough carriers, a mat and a spotter. Agree the stop word first.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You don't need to help. Let the group do the work. Notice where you're trying to hold yourself up."
  • Watch for: Eloff reports laughter, and also tremors, sharp pain, dizziness, nausea and tears. Set the person down at once if there is pain or nausea. Treat tears as acceptable if the person agrees, and check in afterwards. [source: Eloff 2018] [synthesis]

4.8 Trust fall (TOUCH)

  • Purpose: trust in the group and letting go of control. [source: Eloff 2018]
  • Steps (as reported): members take turns closing their eyes and falling backwards into the group's arms.
  • Added steps [synthesis]:
    1. Start from a small lean into two catchers before any full fall.
    2. The faller crosses their arms over the chest and keeps the body straight.
    3. At least four catchers stand with knees bent and hands up.
    4. The faller says "ready" and the catchers answer "ready" before every fall.
    5. Opting out is always allowed.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Only go as far back as feels okay. A small lean counts."
  • Watch for: stepping back to catch oneself, breath-holding, laughter used to break the moment. Bring these to the reading, not as failures but as information.

4.9 The reading (leitura do exercício)

  • Purpose: turn the body experience into awareness. Each person sees their own blocks, pleasures and fears, and those that showed up between people. [source: Sala Preta, citing Freire 2002 p. 285; Ogo & Dejerk p. 6; Slingshot]
  • Steps:
    1. Sit in a circle.
    2. Each person describes the sensations, feelings, emotions and reactions they noticed during the exercise, including barriers they saw in themselves and in others, and moments of pleasure or fear.
    3. Following Gestalt practice, they say how it happened, not why. Interpretation and rationalisation are set aside.
    4. The therapist adds observations from watching the exercise. [source: Ogo & Dejerk pp. 4–5] Eloff adds that the group "reads" how tesão flowed or was blocked within and between members.
  • Example language (illustrative):
    • "What did you notice in your body when you were lifted?"
    • "You said 'because I'm shy'. Leave the because. What happened, physically?"
    • "I noticed you kept your eyes open the whole time. What was that like?"
  • Watch for: interpretations of other people ("you did that because…"). Redirect each speaker to their own experience [synthesis]. Long life stories belong in the meetings without the therapist (4.14). It is working when descriptions get more specific and bodily, and people start recognising their recurring patterns, which Freire called bandeiras [source: Redalyc p. 219].

4.10 The wrap-up (political reading)

  • Purpose: link what the exercise brought up to authoritarian and capitalist social conditions, in line with Freire's view that neurosis is socio-political. [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 6; Eloff 2018]
  • Steps:
    1. The therapist pulls together the exercise and the reading.
    2. They offer a short social or political analysis of the patterns seen (obedience, competition, shame about the body, fear of aggression).
    3. Some sessions add open, non-dogmatic discussion of capitalism, the state, patriarchy and hierarchy. [source: Eloff 2018]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Several of you said you waited for permission before moving. Where else in your life do you wait for permission?"
  • Watch for: analysis turning into lecturing, or members feeling they must agree. In Freire's frame the ideology is stated openly, and it should stay open to disagreement [source: Mnemosine p. 236]. Clients in clinical settings should not be pressed to adopt political views. [synthesis]

4.11 Capoeira Angola practice

  • Purpose: Freire used it as a "complete bioenergetic exercise". It is meant to build body awareness and alertness and the ability to face aggression and oppression, and to loosen armour through low, whole-body movement. Freire said it should be practised "during the soma" and kept up afterwards to relieve tension. [source: Ogo & Dejerk pp. 3–4; Verve p. 155; Liss 2006; Psicorporal pp. 57–61]
  • Steps (as described):
    1. Form a circle (roda). Members sing and play percussion to set the energy and rhythm.
    2. Two players play in the centre, with low movements close to the ground that use the whole body.
    3. It is a game of looking. Each player must keep watching the other. [source: Psicorporal pp. 60–61]
    4. Freire's groups had frequent capoeira classes, taught by capoeira masters (for example a workshop with Mestre Jogo de Dentro). [source: Wikipedia; Boletim Brancaleone]
    5. Some sessions open with capoeira. [source: Eloff 2018]
  • Practical note [synthesis]: teaching capoeira is a separate skill. Bring in a qualified capoeira teacher rather than improvising the movements. Screen for joint, back and cardiovascular problems.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Keep your eyes on your partner. Notice what happens in you when they come close."
  • Watch for: competition overriding play. Freire quoted Mestre Pastinha that capoeira is "amorosa, não é perversa" (loving, not perverse) [source: Psicorporal p. 57]. Watch also for injuries. Bring the experience to the reading: fear, enjoyment, aggression.

4.12 Discharge of tension through massage, movement and dance (TOUCH where massage)

  • Purpose: Freire said bodily tension has to be undone "through massages, movements and dance". [source: Verve p. 155]
  • Steps: the sources give no procedure. [uncertain]
  • Adaptation [synthesis]: if you use partner massage, keep it to the shoulders, back and hands, over clothing, with the touch safeguards above. Free dance to music with eyes closed or open needs no touch.
  • Watch for: massage between group members can sexualise group relationships. Keep it clearly framed and optional. [synthesis]

4.13 Theatre games, children's games and "standardised games" (categories only)

  • Purpose: most Soma exercises came from four years of research with actors at Macunaíma, adapted from unblocking actors' creativity to unblocking "bioenergy and creativity". [source: Sala Preta, citing Freire 1991 p. 56 and 2002 p. 285] Through standardised games, participants regress playfully and reveal the conflicts of their adult social lives, the bandeiras (influenced by play therapy). [source: Redalyc p. 219] The themes covered are creativity, affectivity, socialisation, aggressiveness, communication and sensuality. [source: Boletim Brancaleone; Mnemosine p. 235]
  • Steps: individual games are not described in the sources. [uncertain] Do not reconstruct them from other schools and call them Soma.
  • Watch for: "sensuality" exercises in particular need the touch safeguards and a firm no-sexual-touch boundary. [synthesis]

4.14 Group meetings without the therapist

  • Purpose: to secure "the group's and each person's independence and responsibility". [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 4; Slingshot]
  • Steps:
    1. The group meets on its own, mainly to talk.
    2. Members share life histories, discuss group dynamics, and give each other feedback on challenges, needs, desires and aspirations.
    3. Decisions are taken by consensus. [source: Ogo & Dejerk pp. 4, 7]
  • Added structure [synthesis]: agree basic ground rules in a therapist-led session first (confidentiality, no physical exercises without the therapist, what to do in a crisis, how to reach the therapist). Agree how issues from these meetings come back to the full session.
  • Example language (illustrative): "These meetings belong to you. I won't ask what was said. Bring back whatever you want to work on together."
  • Watch for: scapegoating, a dominant member becoming an unofficial leader, crises that come up with no clinician present. [synthesis]

4.15 Metacommunication

  • Purpose: learn to communicate sincerely and directly. Talk about the situation in which an interaction is happening, as a defence against emotional manipulation and paradoxical communication (after Bateson). [source: Slingshot; p2p wiki; Wikipedia]
  • Steps [synthesis on mechanics; the sources give only the aim]:
    1. In the reading or a group meeting, when an exchange gets confused, stop it.
    2. Ask each person to say what they think is going on between them and what each wants.
    3. Name any contradiction, such as a request phrased as an order, or "be spontaneous".
  • Example language (illustrative): "Can we step out of the content for a second? What's happening between you two right now?"
  • Watch for: metacommunication being used as a weapon ("you're manipulating"). Keep it descriptive.

4.16 Study sessions

  • Purpose: give the theory (Reich, antipsychiatry, communication theory, anarchism) to a group run as a pedagogy. [source: Wikipedia; Boletim Brancaleone; Ogo & Dejerk p. 4]
  • Steps: the therapist introduces the theory, and texts are discussed in separate sessions. The format is not specified. [uncertain]
  • Watch for: theory being used to explain away feelings in the reading. Keep the two apart. [synthesis]

4.17 Social activities, collective work, monthly weekend, nature experiences and self-organised trips

  • Purpose: practise non-authoritarian relating and pleasure in real life outside the session. This is the group as a micro-social laboratory. [source: Slingshot; p2p wiki; Wikipedia; Boletim Brancaleone]
  • Steps:
    1. Hold shared social activities and collective work.
    2. About one full-group weekend a month.
    3. Experiences in nature.
    4. Two trips organised by the group itself.
    5. A closing "autonomous life" period set by the group.
  • Clinical caution [synthesis]: these create dual relationships. A licensed clinician should normally stay out of the social events, leave the trips to the members, and set clear policies on confidentiality and on relationships between members.
  • Watch for: subgroups and exclusion, romantic or sexual involvement inside the group. Bring these into metacommunication and the reading.

4.18 Everyday "erotisation" of ordinary life (between-session practice)

  • Purpose: Freire suggested putting libidinal energy into daily life, for example sensing contact with water, or touching one's own children affectionately. [source: Verve p. 157] This is not sexual and should not be framed as sexual.
  • Steps [synthesis]: ask members to notice one ordinary sensory pleasure each day (water, food, sun, movement) and report it briefly at the next reading.
  • Example language (illustrative): "This week, notice one moment a day when your body enjoyed something ordinary. Just notice it. Nothing to fix."
  • Watch for: people treating it as a performance target. Keep it about noticing.

4.19 Group start (marathon) and planned ending

  • Purpose: Freire opened groups in new cities with weekend "Soma marathons". Groups have a limited, agreed length. [source: Verve p. 153; Slingshot]
  • Steps: the marathon content is not described. [uncertain] For the ending [synthesis]: name the end date from the start. In the last month, review each person's patterns and what they have taken into daily life. Point to continuing practices such as capoeira [source: Verve p. 155].
  • Watch for: dependence on the group, and grief at its end. Plan follow-up or referral for anyone who needs individual therapy. [synthesis]

5. Handling problems

The sources address only three points directly: who is excluded (schizophrenia, advanced emotional crisis), the right to stop at one's limit, and keeping readings descriptive. Everything else below is [synthesis] unless a source is cited.

  • Unsuitable referrals and acute crisis. Soma "doesn't work with schizophrenics or people in advanced states of emotional unbalance" [source: Slingshot]. Screen at intake. If acute distress or suicidality emerges during the group, take the person out of the physical exercises, carry out a standard individual risk assessment and safety plan, and arrange individual care. If means are involved, lethal-means counselling covers safe storage or removal only. Decide together with the person whether they continue in the group. [synthesis]
  • Encouragement to push past limits vs. consent. One account says participants are encouraged to go past their hesitations, while also saying they may stop at their limit [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 5]. [synthesis] Invite, never press. A "no" is itself material for the reading ("what did saying no feel like?"). It is not resistance to be overcome. Never let the group pressure someone into lifting, falling, undressing or being touched.
  • Overwhelm during an exercise (tremor, dizziness, nausea, sharp pain, sobbing, dissociation; Eloff reports such reactions [source: Eloff 2018]). [synthesis]
    1. Stop the exercise for that person and set them down at once if they are being lifted.
    2. Help them sit, with feet on the floor and eyes open, and orient them to the room.
    3. Slow the breath without deepening it.
    4. Stay with them, or assign an assistant to do so.
    5. Check in at the reading and again before they leave.
    6. If they dissociate repeatedly, move them to observer roles and consider individual work first.
    7. Treat physical pain as a reason to stop, never as armour "releasing".
  • Stuck or flat participants (nothing to report, "it was fine"). [synthesis] Ask for one sensation in one body part. Give them a role that suits them, such as observer or musician in the capoeira roda. Read flatness as information (in Soma's terms, holding) without labelling it.
  • "Resistance": refusing exercises, joking, intellectualising. In Freire's frame the problem is socio-political, not a fault in the individual [source: Verve pp. 154–155]. [synthesis] Describe the behaviour in the reading ("I noticed you laughed when it got quiet") and let the person decide what it means. Intellectualising: go back to "how, not why" [source: Ogo & Dejerk p. 6].
  • Non-adherence: missed sessions, skipping the meetings without the therapist. [synthesis] Agree attendance norms by group consensus at the start, since the group is self-managed. Raise absences through metacommunication, not sanctions. The group, not only the therapist, decides how to handle repeated absence.
  • Ruptures with the therapist. The anti-authoritarian frame invites challenges to the therapist [source: Liss 2006; Boletim Brancaleone]. [synthesis] Welcome the challenge. Acknowledge your part concretely and use metacommunication to look at what happened. Do not defend your authority, and do not give up the safety boundaries either: stop signals, touch limits and exclusions are not negotiable by group vote.
  • Ruptures within the group: scapegoating, cliques, dominance in the meetings without the therapist. [synthesis] Use the group as a micro-social laboratory and name the pattern in a therapist-led reading. Rotate roles in exercises. If one person is repeatedly targeted, protect them and stop the game.
  • Sexualisation and boundary problems. Minimal clothing, slap games, massage and "sensuality" exercises raise the risk. Note that tesão covers pleasure, joy and beauty generally, not only sex [source: Mnemosine p. 232]. [synthesis] Comfortable clothing by default. No touch to sensitive areas. Never sexual touch. The therapist has no romantic or sexual contact with members, ever. Set a policy on relationships between members and the confidentiality that goes with them. Handle complaints promptly and outside the group.
  • Physical injury in lifting, falling and capoeira. [synthesis] Screen, use mats and enough carriers, carry at waist height, have a spotter, and bring in a qualified capoeira teacher. Record incidents and check your insurance.
  • Political disagreement or alienation. Freire required the ideological content to be explicit [source: Mnemosine p. 236]. [synthesis] State the frame at intake. Treat disagreement as legitimate. A member who rejects anarchism is not "neurotic". In clinical adaptations, present the social analysis as an offer, not a tenet.
  • Dual relationships from social events and trips. [synthesis] The clinician stays out of these, or sets explicit role limits. Members may socialise freely but should agree how out-of-group events are brought back into the group.
  • Historical practice not to copy. In the 1970s, militants who referred clients received a share of the fees [source: Redalyc p. 220]. [synthesis] Referral fee-splitting is generally an ethical violation for licensed clinicians today.
  • Licensure and training. Freire held that young people who knew the technique were as competent as he was [source: Verve p. 154]. [synthesis] For clinicians, the touch, lifting and group-crisis elements need specific training and supervision. Check what your licence and jurisdiction allow. Present the work as group body-awareness and personal-development work, never as treatment for physical disease.

Sources

Online sources:

Books cited (known through the papers above):

  • Freire, R. (1977). Viva eu, viva tu, viva o rabo do tatu!
  • Freire, R. (1988). Soma: uma terapia anarquista, vol. 1: A alma é o corpo.
  • Freire, R. (1991). Soma, vol. 2: A arma é o corpo.
  • Freire, R. & Mata, J. da (1993). Soma, vol. 3: Corpo a corpo. [uncertain: the third volume's title is given differently in other listings]
  • Freire, R. (1987). Sem tesão não há solução.
  • Freire, R. (2002). Eu é um outro.
  • Mata, J. da (2014). A arte-luta da capoeira angola e práticas libertárias (thesis).