Anorectal biofeedback

1. Introduction

Version followed: the ANMS-ESNM Position Paper and Consensus Guidelines on Biofeedback Therapy for Anorectal Disorders (Rao et al., 2015) for how the treatment is delivered, with the ACG clinical guidelines on benign anorectal disorders (2021 version by Wald et al. for current recommendations and grades; the 2014 version for some descriptive detail) for indications, and NICE CG99 (constipation in children and young people, 2010, last updated 2017) for children. Trauma-informed and chaperone guidance follows the GMC's guidance on intimate examinations and chaperones and Stirling et al.'s 2025 discussion paper on pelvic health physiotherapy after sexual trauma. The 2021 ACG grades for defecation disorders and levator syndrome come from a news report of the guideline and an insurer's clinical policy citing it; the Keefer et al. 2022 and Stirling et al. 2025 citations come from the publishers' and authors' records. Statements tagged ACG 2014 were originally read in a third-party copy that has been removed from Sources; they could not be re-checked against the journal's full text and should be read as [uncertain].

Anorectal biofeedback is a behavioural retraining treatment for certain bowel-control and bowel-emptying problems, chiefly dyssynergic defecation (the pelvic floor and anal muscles tighten instead of relaxing when the person tries to open their bowels) and faecal incontinence. It is a specialist gastroenterology and pelvic-health procedure, usually delivered by nurse therapists or physiotherapists (in trials also physician investigators, and in one paediatric trial a psychologist) in a minority of centres [source: Rao et al. 2015]. Sensors (internal pressure or muscle-activity probes, or surface sensors on the skin) display the person's own muscle activity on a screen so they can learn, with coaching, to coordinate or strengthen muscles they cannot normally sense [source: Rao et al. 2015; ACG 2014]. Change is understood as motor and sensory relearning: seeing a signal, getting immediate feedback and praise or correction, and practising until a coordinated pattern becomes automatic and carries over into everyday toileting [source: Rao et al. 2015].

This guide is written for the psychotherapist working alongside the clinic. The clinic delivers the biofeedback; the psychotherapist's work is referral, preparation, managing shame, anxiety and trauma responses, supporting consent and adherence, coordinating with the team and integrating psychological care for functional bowel disorders. Procedure details are described only at the level of what a client can expect, without intimate procedural detail. A psychotherapist does not deliver internal-sensor anorectal biofeedback unless separately licensed and trained in a profession whose scope includes it [synthesis].

Who delivers it and regulatory/evidence status (as sources state):

Delivered by trained biofeedback therapists, typically nurses or physiotherapists; the consensus calls for standardised training of biofeedback therapists [source: Rao et al. 2015].
Certification route in North America: BCIA offers a Pelvic Muscle Dysfunction Biofeedback (PMDB) certification covering elimination disorders and chronic pelvic pain; currently open only to licensed health-care providers, with didactic education across a blueprint (applied psychophysiology; pelvic floor anatomy, assessment and procedures; bladder dysfunction; bowel dysfunction; chronic pelvic pain), a practicum, mentoring and supervised case sessions, and three-yearly recertification. BCIA has no governmental regulatory power; licensure governs practice [source: Wikipedia, BCIA; details [uncertain: secondary] — check BCIA's own site before relying on them].
Evidence status in adults: the 2021 ACG guideline strongly recommends instrumented anorectal biofeedback therapy for defecation disorders (moderate-quality evidence), and strongly recommends biofeedback for levator syndrome with abnormal anorectal manometry, to teach pelvic floor muscle reconditioning (very low-quality evidence) [source: HealthDay report of Wald et al. 2021; Centene clinical policy CP.MP.168 citing Wald et al. 2021]. The 2021 grade for faecal incontinence was not seen [uncertain]; the guideline keeps biofeedback in the stepwise faecal-incontinence pathway [source: Tran summary of Wald et al. 2021]. The earlier 2014 ACG guideline also called biofeedback the preferred treatment for dyssynergic defecation in adults [source: ACG 2014, not re-checked at the journal, [uncertain]]. ANMS-ESNM recommends it for dyssynergic defecation (Level I, Grade A) and faecal incontinence (Level II, Grade B), and as possibly useful short term for levator ani syndrome and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with dyssynergia [source: Rao et al. 2015]. The AGA medical position statement on constipation (2013) recommends pelvic floor retraining by biofeedback rather than laxatives for defecatory disorders (strong recommendation, high-quality evidence) [source: Centene clinical policy CP.MP.168 citing AGA 2013].
Children: ANMS-ESNM does not recommend biofeedback for routine use in childhood functional constipation (Level 1, Grade D) [source: Rao et al. 2015]. NICE CG99 recommendation 1.6.1: "Do not use biofeedback for ongoing treatment" in children and young people with idiopathic constipation [source: NICE CG99 Recommendations].

2. Framework

The clinic pathway and the psychotherapist's parallel work run side by side.

Clinic pathway (descriptive) [source: Rao et al. 2015; ACG 2014; Tran summary of ACG 2021]:

Conservative care first. Biofeedback for dyssynergic defecation is offered after conservative management (diet, fluids, laxatives, toileting habits) has failed. For faecal incontinence it sits in a stepwise plan with education, stool-consistency management and pelvic floor exercises.
Diagnostic testing. Anorectal function tests (anorectal manometry and a balloon expulsion test; sometimes anal EMG or defecography) establish whether dyssynergia or weakness is present. Selection by abnormal testing predicts response; a diagnosis should not rest on one abnormal test. Goal: confirm the treatable pattern and rule out structural causes.
Education session(s). Explanation of normal anatomy and of the person's own pattern, toileting posture and behaviour. Goal: understanding and engagement.
Training sessions. Customised, typically about an hour, often every two weeks; around four to six for dyssynergic defecation and about six for faecal incontinence, with possible later reinforcement sessions whose value is unclear. Children in trials had up to six. Office-based and home-based training are both used.
Home practice between sessions, as set by the clinic.
Ending criteria (dyssynergic defecation): a consistent coordinated pattern, improved bowel habit and normal expulsion testing. If biofeedback fails, further imaging and, rarely, surgical review or repeat biofeedback follow.

Psychotherapist's parallel phases [synthesis, informed by the sources above]:

Phase	Goals	Typical format	Move on when
A. Recognise and refer	Notice bowel symptoms, shame-driven avoidance, and red flags; encourage GP/gastroenterology review	Within ongoing therapy, 1–2 sessions	Client agrees to (or declines) medical review; red flags routed
B. Prepare	Psychoeducation, explore fears, trauma screening where purposeful, plan for consent, stop signals, chaperone or support person, rehearse questions for the clinic	1–3 sessions before testing or first biofeedback visit	Client can name what will happen, what they want to ask, and how to stop
C. Accompany	Debrief each clinic visit, regulate arousal, support home practice, address setbacks, liaise with clinic (with consent)	Brief check-ins alongside the clinic's course	Clinic course ends or client opts out
D. Integrate and end	Consolidate gains, relapse plan, continue brain-gut psychological work for persisting functional symptoms, trauma work if indicated	Ongoing as clinically indicated	Agreed goals met

3. Guiding principles

The clinic delivers the procedure; you support the person. Never coach muscle technique, interpret test results or change the clinic's plan; route all clinical questions to the team [synthesis].
Medical review before psychological explanation. Bowel symptoms need proper assessment; do not frame them as "psychological" before a clinician has reviewed them [synthesis].
Consent is specific, voluntary and ongoing. It can be withdrawn at any time; silence or freezing is not consent [source: Stirling et al.; GMC paras 8–14]. Practical meaning: help clients know they may stop, pause or change their mind at any visit.
The right to stop is real. The GMC tells doctors to tell patients they can ask to stop at any time, to check during the examination and to stop if asked [source: GMC paras 8d, 13c–d]. Practical meaning: rehearse how the client will signal stop.
Chaperones are offered, not assumed. A trained chaperone should be offered; a relative, friend or advocate may be present in addition on reasonable request [source: GMC paras 8e, 16–20]. Practical meaning: help the client decide what they want and ask for it.
Choice, control and alternatives. Trauma-informed pelvic health practice offers options at every appointment, including non-internal alternatives where clinically possible [source: Stirling et al.]. Practical meaning: help clients ask what alternatives the clinic offers.
Safety, trust, collaboration, empowerment. Trauma-informed care principles [source: Stirling et al.]. Practical meaning: transparency about what you share with the clinic and why.
Screen for trauma only with a purpose. Ask sensitively and only where it informs care; warn that questions can stir memories [source: Stirling et al.]. Practical meaning: the client controls what is disclosed to the clinic.
Motivation and willingness matter. Willingness to participate predicted success in dyssynergic defecation, and incontinence training needs adequate cognitive ability and motivation [source: Rao et al. 2015]. Practical meaning: ambivalence is a legitimate therapy target.
Shame is expected, not a character flaw. Bowel symptoms carry stigma and impair quality of life [source: Rao et al. 2015 on quality of life; stance is synthesis]. Practical meaning: use plain, matter-of-fact language.
Children need age-appropriate, non-punitive care. NICE recommends negotiated, non-punitive behavioural interventions suited to the child's developmental stage, and does not recommend routine psychology referral unless the child is identified as likely to benefit [source: NICE CG99 1.5.2, 1.6.2]. Practical meaning: never support shaming or punishing a child over soiling.
Safeguarding stays in view. CG99 links certain findings or disclosures to its child-maltreatment recommendation [source: NICE CG99 Table 2 note]. Practical meaning: know your local safeguarding route before you begin.
Coordinate, with consent. Share only what the client agrees to, except where safeguarding or risk duties apply [synthesis].

4. Intervention inventory

Part A: what the clinic does (descriptive only, so you can prepare and debrief clients). These components are delivered by the biofeedback therapist, not the psychotherapist. Descriptions are deliberately non-procedural. [source for Part A: Rao et al. 2015; ACG 2014; Tran summary of ACG 2021, unless marked]

A1. Education about anatomy, the person's own pattern and toileting

Purpose: help the client understand what their muscles are doing (for example, unconsciously tightening when trying to empty) and correct toileting posture and habits.
What the client experiences: explanation, diagrams and, often, their own tracings on a screen compared with a normal pattern.
Example language (illustrative), for your preparation: "The first part is mostly talking and pictures. They'll explain what your muscles are doing and why."
Watch for: shame or self-blame ("I've been doing it wrong all my life"); reframe as an unlearned reflex, not a failing [synthesis].

A2. Breathing and abdominal coordination

Purpose: abdominal (diaphragmatic) breathing and appropriate push effort are taught as part of dyssynergia retraining.
What the client experiences: coached breathing while seated; practised at home.
Watch for: breath-holding and bracing, which can also be trauma or anxiety responses [source: Stirling et al. on signs of distress].
Example language (illustrative): "They'll coach you in a calm breathing pattern. It's the same kind of breathing we practise here, so you already have a head start." [synthesis]

A3. Coordination retraining with visual feedback (dyssynergic defecation)

Purpose: learn to relax the pelvic floor and anal muscles while gently pushing, using a screen display of pressure or muscle activity.
What the client experiences: a sensor (an internal pressure or EMG probe, or surface sensors on the skin of the anorectal area) records activity; the therapist gives verbal feedback, praising correct attempts and correcting errors.
Watch for after sessions: frustration at slow progress; dissociation or numbness reported during the session.
Example language (illustrative): "The screen shows what your muscles are doing, so you can learn to let them relax at the right moment. You can ask what each step involves before it happens." [synthesis]

A4. Simulated evacuation training (dyssynergic defecation)

Purpose: practise the coordinated pattern in a task that resembles opening the bowels, using clinic equipment, until repeat testing normalises.
What the client experiences: a practice task in clinic, with the therapist coaching. Clients may find this the most embarrassing element [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "This is the part many people find most embarrassing. The team does it every day. What would help you feel more in control?" [synthesis]
Watch for: avoidance of this session, or shame or dissociation afterwards; plan a debrief (B9). [synthesis]

A5. Sensory retraining

Purpose: for reduced rectal sensation, learn to notice smaller sensations of fullness; for heightened urgency, learn to tolerate larger ones. Used optionally in dyssynergic defecation and routinely in faecal incontinence programmes.
What the client experiences: graded sensations of fullness produced with clinic equipment, with the client reporting what they feel.
Example language (illustrative): "You'll be asked what you notice. There are no wrong answers, just your honest report." [synthesis]
Watch for: fear-driven over- or under-reporting of sensations; help the client tell fear apart from sensation. [synthesis]

A6. Strength and isolation training (faecal incontinence)

Purpose: strengthen and coordinate the external sphincter and pelvic floor (modified pelvic floor squeezes) without tensing the abdominal wall.
What the client experiences: squeezes guided by the display, then home exercises.
Example language (illustrative): "The display shows whether the right muscles are working. The home exercises are where most of the change happens." [synthesis]
Watch for: discouragement when gains are slow, or overdoing the exercises; send technique questions to the clinic. [synthesis]

A7. Urge-resistance training (faecal incontinence)

Purpose: use relaxation to tolerate urgency and delay toileting.
Overlap with your work: relaxation and urge-tolerance skills draw on the same arousal-regulation skills you may already teach; coordinate so messages match [synthesis].
What the client experiences: relaxation and coping skills practised while tolerating urgency, then used at home, as the clinic directs. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "The calming skills you've learned here can help when the urge comes. The clinic will show you how to use them for this." [synthesis]
Watch for: panic at urgency, or fear of accidents leading to avoidance of going out; address this alongside the clinic's work. [synthesis]

A8. Home practice and home biofeedback

Purpose: generalisation. Dyssynergia programmes set regular breathing and toileting practice; incontinence programmes set regular squeeze exercises and urge-control practice. Home training devices exist but no standard approved device is identified; one trial found home biofeedback as useful as office training [source: Rao et al. 2015].
Your role: support adherence (see B7), never set or change the prescription.
What the client experiences: a home programme set by the clinic; any home device is supplied and explained by the clinic. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "What would make the home exercises easier to fit into your day?" [synthesis]
Watch for: privacy problems, forgetting, or quietly giving up; review practice without judgement (B7). [synthesis]

A9. Non-internal and lower-exposure options

Purpose / when: lower-exposure options for clients for whom internal sensors are difficult, especially after trauma. [synthesis]
What sources say: muscle activity can be recorded from an internal sensor or from surface sensors on the skin of the anorectal area [source: ACG 2014; Tran summary]. In pelvic health physiotherapy more broadly, trauma-informed practice offers alternatives such as transabdominal ultrasound biofeedback, observation with or without external touch, and varying the depth and pressure of internal assessment [source: Stirling et al.].
Caution: whether a non-internal option is clinically adequate for a given anorectal problem is the clinic's decision [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "You can ask the clinic whether a sensor on the skin, or another option without anything internal, could work for you." [synthesis]
Watch for: clients declining treatment altogether because they don't know other options exist. [synthesis]

A10. Who is not suited (as sources list)

Purpose / when: know which clients the clinic may judge unsuitable, so expectations are realistic. [synthesis]
Dyssynergic defecation: severe neurological disorders, inability to sit on a commode, developmental disability and visual impairment are listed as contraindications. Faecal incontinence: spinal cord injury, severe internal sphincter injury, dementia, developmental disability, uncontrolled psychosis, age under 8 and visual impairment [source: Rao et al. 2015]. ACG 2014 also lists overflow incontinence linked to behavioural or psychiatric disorders and substantial loss of rectal sensation among situations where biofeedback is not indicated.
Your relevance: if a client's mental state (for example active psychosis) may affect suitability, say so to the referrer with consent [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "The clinic will decide whether this treatment suits you. If it doesn't, there are other options, and we can look at them together." [synthesis]
Watch for: a client hearing 'not suitable' as a personal failure. [synthesis]

Part B: the psychotherapist's interventions. Unless marked otherwise these are [synthesis], built on the trauma-informed, consent and chaperone sources cited.

B1. Recognising when to suggest a medical review

Purpose: bowel problems are often hidden for years out of embarrassment; you may be the first person told.
Steps: (1) Ask plainly about bowel habits when a client mentions pain, avoidance of leaving home, soiling or toilet-related anxiety. (2) Encourage GP or gastroenterology review for any persistent change. (3) Treat new bleeding, unexplained weight loss, a recent change in bowel habit (especially in older adults), night-time symptoms or severe pain as needing prompt medical review [synthesis; general clinical practice, not from the biofeedback sources]. (4) In children, NICE CG99 lists "red flag" findings that need specialist assessment [source: NICE CG99].
Example language (illustrative): "Lots of people never mention bowel problems to anyone. It's worth getting checked properly, and I can help you plan what to say to the GP."
Watch for: reassurance-seeking from you instead of medical review; do not diagnose.

B2. Referral and collaborative care

Purpose: ensure the client reaches a centre with anorectal testing and trained biofeedback therapists, and that care is joined up.
Steps: (1) With consent, write to the referrer noting relevant psychological factors (anxiety, trauma history the client wants shared, eating disorder, cognitive difficulties). Dyssynergic defecation is associated with anxiety, depression, eating disorders, trauma and physical or sexual abuse [source: Tran summary of ACG 2021]. (2) Agree with the client exactly what is shared. (3) Ask the clinic for a named contact. (4) Agree who the client contacts for what.
Example language (illustrative): "Would it help if the clinic knew that internal procedures are hard for you, without any details? You decide what goes in the letter."
Watch for: the client feeling 'labelled' as psychological; frame the letter as helping the clinic adapt care.

B3. Psychoeducation about the treatment

Purpose: reduce fear of the unknown and correct myths.
Steps: (1) Explain in plain terms that biofeedback teaches muscles to coordinate or strengthen using a screen display (Part A). (2) Explain that it is usually a short course with home practice [source: Rao et al. 2015]. (3) Encourage the client to ask the clinic directly about sensors, positioning, clothing and duration. (4) Normalise that learning takes several sessions.
Example language (illustrative): "It's more like physiotherapy with a screen than a test you pass or fail."
Watch for: catastrophic predictions; note them for B6.

B4. Supporting informed consent and shared decision-making

Purpose: the client makes a free, informed choice and knows it can change.
Steps: (1) Help the client list questions: why it is recommended, what will happen, any discomfort, alternatives, what happens if they decline [source: GMC para 8 on explanation]. (2) Clarify that consent is ongoing and can be withdrawn [source: Stirling et al.]. (3) Explore ambivalence without steering; the decision and any clinical plan sit with the client and clinic.
Example language (illustrative): "You can say yes to the first appointment and still decide at any point that you want to stop or do it differently."
Watch for: compliance driven by fear of displeasing clinicians; that is not free consent.

B5. Trauma-informed preparation: history, stop signals, chaperones, choice

Purpose: prevent re-traumatisation during an intimate procedure.
Steps: (1) If trauma is known or suspected, explore purposefully and gently what parts of the procedure might be triggering; do not press for details of the trauma [source: Stirling et al. on purposeful, sensitive screening]. (2) Plan a stop signal that works even if the client freezes or cannot speak, such as a hand signal, because silence or immobility is not consent [source: Stirling et al.]. (3) Discuss chaperones: doctors in the UK should offer one, and a relative, friend or advocate may be present in addition on reasonable request [source: GMC paras 16–20]. (4) Identify choices the client may want to request: privacy to undress, staying covered, being told before each step, music, curtain arrangements, being asked before any change of plan [source: GMC paras 12–15; Stirling et al. case example]. (5) Encourage asking whether non-internal options exist (A9). (6) Write a short client-owned 'what helps me' note they can share if they wish.
Example language (illustrative): "What would you want the therapist to know so you feel more in control? We can write it down and you choose whether to hand it over."
Watch for: the client minimising their needs to avoid being 'difficult'; affirm that these requests are ordinary.

B6. Working with shame and anticipatory anxiety

Purpose: reduce avoidance and distress that block attendance or learning.
Steps: (1) Elicit the feared scenario and specific shame thoughts. (2) Use cognitive work on predictions (being judged, losing control, smell, soiling) and on how clinicians actually view the work. (3) Use graded imaginal preparation: walking through arrival, waiting, the conversation, the screen, the end; stop short of procedural detail. (4) Use self-compassion or matter-of-fact reframes. (5) Plan coping for the day.
Example language (illustrative): "For the team this is routine work. What would it be like to let them be the experts on bodies, and you the expert on what you need?"
Watch for: escalating avoidance; consider whether a separate anxiety or trauma treatment should come first, and say so to the referrer with consent.

B7. Adherence and ambivalence about home practice

Purpose: home practice drives generalisation [source: Rao et al. 2015], and willingness to participate predicts success.
Steps: (1) Ask what the clinic set and how it is going, without adjusting it. (2) Use motivational interviewing: explore reasons, barriers and values. (3) Problem-solve privacy, routines and reminders. (4) If practice seems wrong, painful or confusing, direct the client back to the clinic.
Example language (illustrative): "I can't advise on the exercises themselves, but we can look at what gets in the way of doing them."
Watch for: giving technique advice; discouragement after a bad week.

B8. Regulation skills the client can bring to sessions

Purpose: manage arousal during clinic visits.
Steps: teach grounding, orienting to the room, body awareness and slow breathing, which Stirling et al. describe for pelvic health work [source: Stirling et al.]; agree with the client how they will use them in clinic. Coordinate with the clinic, since breathing is also part of their training (A2).
Watch for: breath-holding, tension, tremor, flushing, racing heart or immobility, which Stirling et al. describe as signs of distress [source: Stirling et al.].
Example language (illustrative): "Let's practise the grounding you'll use in clinic now, so it's ready when you need it." [synthesis]

B9. Debriefing after clinic visits

Purpose: process the experience and catch distress, dissociation or rupture with the clinic early.
Steps: (1) Ask what went well, what was hard, and whether any moment felt out of their control. (2) Look for gaps in memory, numbness or feeling 'not there'. (3) Review whether the stop signal and preferences were respected. (4) Plan adjustments the client wants to ask for. (5) If preferences were ignored, support the client to raise it or complain.
Example language (illustrative): "Was there any point when you wanted it to stop? What happened then?"
Watch for: memory gaps, numbness, or a sense that preferences were ignored; follow these up with the client and, with consent, the clinic. [synthesis]

B10. Responding if a trauma memory or disclosure emerges

Purpose: respond safely when the procedure surfaces abuse memories, which may be first disclosed now.
Steps: (1) Listen, believe, avoid leading questions. (2) Assess current safety and risk. (3) Follow safeguarding duties if a child or adult at risk may currently be in danger. (4) Offer or refer to trauma-focused treatment. (5) Agree with the client whether the clinic needs to know anything to adapt care.
Watch for: pressure to 'push through' biofeedback; a pause may be the right choice for the client.
Example language (illustrative): "Thank you for telling me. I believe you. We'll go at your pace and think together about what you need now to be safe." [synthesis]

B11. Children and young people: safeguarding, consent and assent, parents

Purpose / when: keep the child safe, heard and willing, and support parents, whenever a child or young person is offered anorectal biofeedback. [synthesis]
What the sources state: ANMS-ESNM suggests children should generally be at least 5 for biofeedback and lists age under 8 among contraindications for faecal-incontinence biofeedback; it does not recommend routine biofeedback for childhood functional constipation [source: Rao et al. 2015]. NICE CG99 says not to use biofeedback for ongoing treatment in idiopathic constipation, not to refer routinely to psychology or CAMHS unless the child is likely to benefit, and to use negotiated, non-punitive behavioural approaches (scheduled toileting, bowel diary, encouragement and rewards) [source: NICE CG99 1.5.2, 1.6.1, 1.6.2]. Digital rectal examination in children is restricted to competent professionals and specific circumstances [source: NICE CG99 1.2.1–1.2.3]. The GMC says to assess a child's capacity to consent and, if lacking, seek a parent's consent or other valid authority [source: GMC para 11].
Steps: (1) Check the child's and family's understanding of why anything internal is proposed, especially given NICE's position. (2) Seek the child's own view and assent in age-appropriate language, alongside parental consent; a child's distress or refusal should be heard and passed on [synthesis]. (3) Support parents to stay calm, non-punitive and non-shaming at home. (4) Know your local safeguarding procedure; CG99 links certain findings or disclosures to its maltreatment recommendation [source: NICE CG99 Table 2 note]. Do not interpret physical findings yourself. (5) Liaise with the school nurse or team where agreed [source: NICE CG99 1.8.3 on school-nurse liaison].
Example language (illustrative, to a child): "Nobody is in trouble. Your body is learning, and you can always tell a grown-up if something feels wrong."
Watch for: punishment, shaming or coercion at home; withholding linked to fear or pain; signs of maltreatment.

B12. Integrating psychological care for functional bowel disorders

Purpose: many clients have overlapping disorders of gut-brain interaction (for example IBS) and anxiety or depression [source: Tran summary of ACG 2021 on associations].
Steps: (1) Offer evidence-based brain-gut behaviour therapies where you are trained, or refer to a GI psychologist. The Rome Foundation working team report (Keefer et al., 2022) describes five established classes: disease self-management programmes, cognitive-behavioural therapy, gut-directed hypnotherapy, mindfulness-based interventions and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy; it treats acceptance-based approaches as an emerging area, and states that rectal biofeedback is a behavioural technique it does not count as a brain-gut behaviour therapy class [source: Keefer et al. 2022]. The report notes that CBT and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy are delivered by mental health professionals, gut-directed hypnotherapy and mindfulness-based programmes need specialty training, and that therapists without GI specialisation (for example with chronic illness or pain training) can often provide these therapies; the Rome Foundation's GastroPsych division trains mental health specialists [source: Keefer et al. 2022]. It also lists constipation with dyssynergic defecation among GI disorders commonly associated with a history of abuse [source: Keefer et al. 2022]. (2) Time the work: preparation before, brief support during, and deeper work (symptom-specific anxiety, hypervigilance, trauma) after or alongside [synthesis]. (3) Keep messages consistent with the clinic [synthesis].
Watch for: psychological work being used to dismiss physical symptoms.
Example language (illustrative): "Your gut symptoms are real, and stress can turn the volume up. We can work on both sides at once." [synthesis]

B13. Monitoring and passing on concerns

Purpose / when: keep the clinic and GP informed of concerns that affect safety or care. [synthesis]
Steps: with consent, tell the clinic or GP about new or worsening symptoms, pain, injury, marked distress or dissociation in sessions, or difficulty with home practice. Escalate urgent physical symptoms to medical services and safeguarding concerns through the proper route.
Example language (illustrative): "With your permission, I'd like to let the clinic know about the pain you mentioned so they can adjust things." [synthesis]
Watch for: holding concerns back to protect the relationship; agree in advance what you will pass on. [synthesis]

B14. Ending and relapse support

Purpose: maintain gains once the clinic course ends.
Steps: (1) Review what changed in symptoms and in shame or avoidance. (2) Agree a plan for early signs of relapse, including returning to the clinic, since reinforcement sessions are sometimes offered [source: Rao et al. 2015]. (3) Continue trauma or brain-gut work as indicated.
Example language (illustrative): "If old patterns creep back, that's a reason to contact the clinic, not a sign you failed."
Watch for: relapse after the course being read as failure; normalise it and route the client back to the clinic. [synthesis]

5. Handling problems

The biofeedback sources say little about psychological difficulties beyond motivation, cognitive ability and attention. Most responses below are [synthesis], drawing on the trauma-informed and consent sources where cited.

Client avoids referral or testing for months. Explore the feared scenario (B6), separate 'getting checked' from 'agreeing to treatment', and offer to help draft what to say. If red-flag symptoms are present, be clear that review should not wait [synthesis].
Freezing, dissociation or panic during a clinic visit. Stirling et al. describe watching for immobility and distress, reorienting the person to the room, offering other ways to communicate, and reviewing afterwards what was sensed and felt [source: Stirling et al.]. Your role: debrief (B9), strengthen stop signals and grounding, and with consent ask the clinic to adapt pacing. Consider pausing biofeedback while trauma-focused work proceeds; the client decides with the clinic.
Preferences or the stop signal were not respected. Validate, document the client's account, support them to raise it with the clinic or through the complaints route; under GMC guidance clinicians should check in and stop if asked [source: GMC paras 13c–d]. Do not encourage return until the client feels safe.
Non-adherence to home practice. Explore privacy, time, discouragement, pain and shame (B7). Do not adjust the exercises; send technical questions to the clinic.
Slow progress or 'failure'. Normalise that learning takes several sessions and that the clinic has next steps if biofeedback does not work [source: Rao et al. 2015; Tran summary of ACG 2021]. Work on all-or-nothing thinking.
Ambivalence or wanting to stop. Treat as a legitimate choice; help the client tell the clinic and discuss alternatives with them. Never imply they must continue [source: Stirling et al. and GMC on ongoing consent].
Overwhelm from trauma memories triggered by the work. Shift to stabilisation, assess risk, consider trauma-focused therapy (B10). Follow standard suicide and self-harm risk assessment if risk appears [synthesis].
Rupture with you over 'it's all in my head'. Repair explicitly: physical symptoms are real and medically assessed; psychological care is alongside, not instead of, medical care [synthesis].
Rupture with the clinic. Help the client name what went wrong; with consent, liaise with the named contact; avoid taking sides.
Eating-disorder overlap. Dyssynergic defecation is associated with eating disorders [source: Tran summary of ACG 2021]. Screen for restriction, laxative misuse or purging and coordinate with the eating-disorder team and GP; do not advise on diet or laxatives [synthesis].
Cognitive impairment, developmental disability or psychosis. These are listed contraindications in some contexts [source: Rao et al. 2015]. Raise relevant concerns with the referrer, support capacity assessment and involve carers or advocates as appropriate [synthesis].
Child refuses or is distressed; parents push. Name that NICE does not support biofeedback for ongoing treatment of idiopathic constipation and recommends non-punitive approaches [source: NICE CG99 1.5.2, 1.6.1]. Encourage the family to raise the child's distress with the team. Escalate safeguarding concerns through the local route without investigating yourself.
Client asks you to explain test results or technique. Decline kindly and redirect to the clinic; you can help them prepare questions [synthesis].
Your own discomfort with the topic. Use supervision; Stirling et al. recommend supervision, debriefing, training and clear boundaries to manage vicarious trauma in pelvic health work [source: Stirling et al.].

Sources

Online sources:

Cited but not verified in full:

Wald A, Bharucha AE, Limketkai B, Malcolm A, Remes-Troche JM, Whitehead WE, Zutshi M. (2021). ACG Clinical Guidelines: Management of Benign Anorectal Disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 116(10):1987–2008; DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001507 (GRADE-based; grades for defecation disorders and levator syndrome confirmed via the HealthDay report and Centene policy; faecal-incontinence grade [uncertain]).
Keefer L, Ballou SK, Drossman DA, Ringstrom G, Elsenbruch S, Ljótsson B. (2022). A Rome Working Team Report on Brain-Gut Behavior Therapies for Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction. Gastroenterology 162(1):300–315; DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.015 (verified via the Rome Foundation copy and the Mount Sinai Scholars record).

← Previous · IX-043Pressure and pelvic-floor biofeedback (Kegel perineometer)Next · IX-045 →Alpha training (Kamiya)