Constraint-induced movement therapy (Taub)

1. Introduction

Version followed: the upper-extremity CI therapy protocol of the UAB (University of Alabama at Birmingham) CI Therapy Research Group, as characterised by Morris, Taub and Mark (2006) and used in Taub et al.'s 2006 placebo-controlled trial, with the transfer package as described in those papers; the clinic format is that of the UAB Neuroplasticity Rehabilitation Program (Taub Therapy Clinic) as its FAQ page describes it. Expanded CI therapy for plegic hands (Uswatte et al.) is noted where it differs. Modified, lower-intensity variants ("mCIMT") used elsewhere are not the version followed. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006; UAB FAQ]

Sources include: the 1994 shaping paper (citation and abstract), the 2013 transfer-package trial (full text), and the EXCITE trial (NIH press release). The 2023 UK and Ireland National Clinical Guideline for Stroke is drawn on only through a secondary editorial. Not verified: the guideline's exact recommendation wording and criteria, and any European Stroke Organisation recommendation on CIMT [uncertain].

Who delivers it and where it sits. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy, CIMT) is a neurorehabilitation treatment for the more-affected arm after stroke and other neurological injury. It is delivered one-to-one by trained therapists; at UAB the clinic contact is an occupational therapist, and in the expanded-CIMT trial treatment was given by an occupational therapist and the placebo by a physical therapist, both with CIMT experience. The 2006 protocol paper calls the deliverers "interventionists" (therapists or trainers). It is therefore a physiotherapy / occupational therapy method, not a psychotherapy. In the UK both are registered professions regulated by the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), with protected titles "physiotherapist"/"physical therapist" and "occupational therapist". In the US, physical and occupational therapists are licensed at state level [uncertain: US licensing bodies not verified]. [source: UAB FAQ; Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint; Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; HCPC "The professions"]

This guide is written for the psychotherapist working alongside the rehabilitation team. You do not deliver CI therapy. Your work is collaboration, referral, and integrating psychological care (mood, adjustment, frustration, motivation, family strain) around an intensive, behaviourally demanding treatment. CI therapy is itself partly behavioural: its developer, Edward Taub, is a behavioural neuroscientist, and the treatment was first framed as an operant (reinforcement-based) approach. Taub et al. (1994, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior) argued that part of the motor deficit after some injuries is learned non-use, and proposed changing the reinforcement contingencies so that using the impaired arm pays off: restricting the unimpaired arm for two weeks while training the impaired one, with preliminary data suggesting that shaping with verbal feedback adds further gains. [source: Taub et al. 1994, abstract via repository record; UAB training manuals & publications page]

Core idea of change: overcoming learned non-use. Taub proposed, from deafferentation research in monkeys, that after neurological injury a limb can become little used even when it is capable of more. Early failed attempts to use the arm are punished (falls, spills, effort) while using the other arm is rewarded, so non-use is learned and persists. The gap between what the person can do in the clinic and what they do at home is treated as "an index of learned nonuse". CI therapy aims to reverse this by (1) concentrated, repetitive, graded practice of the more-affected arm, (2) constraining use of the less-affected arm, and (3) a set of behavioural methods — the transfer package — that move gains from the clinic into daily life. The developers name repeated, concentrated practice as the probable common active factor and describe the restraint as the least important element. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006]

Eligibility as sources state it. The UAB clinic accepts adolescents and adults with neurological illness or injury (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis), generally treating at least 6 months after injury (evaluation may begin at 3 months), who are medically stable, able to take part fully in an intensive programme, and show active movement of the more-affected arm and hand; children under 14 are referred to the paediatric CI therapy clinic at Children's of Alabama. In the 2006 trial, people were excluded if they could not actively extend the fingers and wrist to a stated minimum (the "focal criterion": 10° at finger joints and 20° at the wrist), already used the arm substantially in daily life (Motor Activity Log above a cut-off), had bilateral or brainstem stroke, major cognitive deficits (Mini-Mental State score threshold of 24) or aphasia preventing valid testing, balance or walking problems (e.g. needing help to toilet), excessive pain, spasticity, ataxia or frailty, or severe uncontrolled medical conditions. Somatosensory loss, long duration and amount of prior therapy were not exclusions. The expanded protocol (eCIMT) was developed for people with little or no active hand movement and adds orthotics, tone-management techniques, EMG-triggered electrical stimulation and bimanual practice; there the mitt was worn only when safe because participants needed that hand for balance and walking aids. Mood and depression were not listed exclusions in these trials, and no depression screening instrument is described. [source: UAB FAQ; Taub et al. 2006; Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint]

Status in guidelines and the main multicentre trial. A 2025 editorial in the British Journal of Occupational Therapy summarising the 2023 National Clinical Guideline for Stroke for the UK and Ireland (Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party) lists "consideration of constraint-induced movement therapy" among its upper-limb recommendations (Stockley, Clark & Kelly 2025). A 2024 nursing commentary likewise states that CIMT is now recommended in national guidelines, framing it for people with preserved finger extension (Lamb, Hill & Santos 2024). The guideline's own wording, eligibility criteria and delivery details are not drawn on here [uncertain: consult the guideline directly]. No European Stroke Organisation (ESO) recommendation on CIMT was found or verified [uncertain]. The main multicentre trial is EXCITE (Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation; Wolf et al., JAMA 2006;296(17):2095–2104), led by Steven Wolf at Emory University and funded by NICHD and NINDS. In it, 222 people with arm weakness from a stroke 3–9 months earlier received either a two-week course (weekday training sessions lasting several hours, with a mitt on the less-affected hand) or usual care, and were followed for 12 months. The CIMT group had better arm function at every time point. These figures describe the trial; they are not a schedule to follow. [source: NICHD news release 31 Oct 2006; Stockley et al. 2025; Lamb et al. 2024 abstract]

2. Framework

CI therapy is a time-limited, intensive outpatient course with a defined before, during and after. The phases below follow the UAB sources; how the psychotherapist fits into each is marked [synthesis].

Phase A — Referral, screening and assessment. Goal: decide candidacy and set measurable goals. At the UAB clinic: a patient information form, therapist review, a video screening, then an in-person assessment; patients should apply for themselves, want to improve, set realistic measurable goals and commit to the programme; a companion is strongly recommended because people who come alone often struggle with home tasks and mitt wear. Typical outcome tools in the UAB research group are the Motor Activity Log (MAL, a structured interview on how much and how well the arm is used in daily activities) and the Wolf Motor Function Test (laboratory motor ability); both have published manuals on the UAB site. Move on when: the team confirms eligibility and the person and companion consent to the demands. [source: UAB FAQ; UAB training manuals page; Morris, Taub & Mark 2006]

Psychotherapist [synthesis]: screen for depression, anxiety, apathy and cognitive or communication barriers that could affect consent and adherence; share findings with the team (with consent); help the person decide whether now is the right time.

Phase B — Intensive treatment. Goal: concentrated practice plus transfer to daily life. The published protocol used shaping and task practice for many hours per weekday over two to three consecutive weeks (the original laboratory protocol 6 hours a day for 10 weekdays; 3 hours a day was effective for higher-functioning patients; the UAB clinic describes about 3.5 hours a day, 5 days a week, for 2–3 weeks, with home practice in evenings and weekends). Restraint of the less-affected hand was targeted at most waking hours ("90% of waking hours" in the published protocol). The transfer package runs daily alongside (see section 4). These figures describe what the developers used; they are not instructions — the rehabilitation team sets the schedule. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006; UAB FAQ]

Psychotherapist [synthesis]: brief, scheduled support (often outside therapy hours, given fatigue); work on frustration, fatigue and mood; coordinate with the therapists on adherence barriers, never adjusting the rehab plan yourself.

Phase C — After treatment. Goal: maintain and extend real-world use. The published protocol continues home practice indefinitely after the course ("home practice-after") and makes weekly phone contacts for the first month, with the MAL repeated by phone; the clinic sends people home with an individualised home programme. Only one limb or function is treated at a time; another can be treated after 3 months at the UAB clinic. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006; UAB FAQ]

Psychotherapist [synthesis]: this is often where psychological work matters most — the end of daily structure and therapist accountability, the confrontation with residual disability, and the risk of slipping back into non-use.

Criteria for moving between phases. In the sources these are set by the rehabilitation team (eligibility on assessment; course completion; follow-up schedule). The psychotherapist's own criterion [synthesis]: escalate to the team or the person's physician whenever mood, risk or medical issues (pain, falls, exhaustion) make the intensive phase unsafe or unworkable.

3. Guiding principles

Principles of CI therapy as the developers state them, then the psychotherapist's stance.

Learned non-use is learned and can be unlearned — treat the person's low use of the arm as behaviour shaped by consequences, not as a fixed ceiling or a character trait. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006]
Massed, repetitive practice is the active ingredient — the dose of concentrated practice matters more than the mitt; anything that keeps the person using the affected arm counts as "constraint". [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006]
Shaping: small steps, immediate feedback — tasks are tailored to the person's deficits, made harder in small increments as performance improves, with explicit feedback on speed or quality after each trial; frequent positive feedback. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006; Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint]
Transfer to real life is a separate target — clinic gains do not automatically appear at home, so the treatment explicitly builds monitoring, accountability, problem solving and home practice. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006]
Accountability through contracts and self-monitoring — signed agreements, daily diaries and daily review of arm use are core, not optional. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006]
Safety governs restraint — the mitt is a safety mitt and in the expanded protocol is worn only when safe (balance, walking aids). [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint]
The family is part of treatment — a caregiver contract and a companion during treatment are part of the published method and recommended by the clinic. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; UAB FAQ]
Psychotherapist: you are an adjunct, not a co-therapist of the motor programme — support, refer, coordinate; never modify the exercise, mitt or schedule yourself. [synthesis]
Psychotherapist: speak the team's behavioural language — the transfer package uses goal setting, self-monitoring, contracting and problem solving; align your work with it rather than running a competing plan. [synthesis]
Psychotherapist: mood is a treatment-relevant variable — frustration and fatigue are expected (the clinic notes patients may feel frustrated and tired and gives rest breaks); persistent low mood, hopelessness or withdrawal need assessment and communication to the team. [source: UAB FAQ for frustration/fatigue; synthesis for the rest]
Psychotherapist: protect autonomy and realistic hope — the person applies for and commits to the programme themselves; your job is informed, free choice and realistic expectations, not persuasion. [source: UAB FAQ for self-application; synthesis]

4. Intervention inventory

Part A describes how the rehabilitation team delivers CI therapy, as the UAB group publishes it, at a descriptive level so you can understand what your client is going through. It is not a protocol for you to run. Part B is the psychotherapist's own work.

Part A — How CI therapy is delivered (descriptive)

A1. Shaping

Purpose: build motor ability of the more-affected arm in small, reinforced steps (behavioural shaping). [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006]
What the team does: selects tasks tailored to the person's specific deficits; runs short, timed trials with explicit feedback on speed or quality after each trial; makes the task slightly harder (e.g. object further, smaller or heavier, faster time) as performance improves; uses frequent positive feedback. The protocol paper describes sets of short trials per task. In expanded CIMT for plegic hands, tasks are easier than standard. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint]
What the client experiences: repetitive, effortful, sometimes tedious work with constant feedback; visible numeric progress; frustration when a step is failed.
Watch for (psychotherapist): reactions to failure or feedback (shame, irritability, giving up), fatigue, pain complaints — pass them to the therapist. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "Failing a step today means the task was set just beyond you, which is how shaping is meant to work. How did it feel?" [synthesis]

A2. Task practice

Purpose: practise whole functional activities in a less structured way. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006]
What the team does: the person works continuously on a functional task (described as roughly 15–20 minutes per activity in the protocol paper) and receives global feedback at the end rather than trial-by-trial. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006]
Watch for: same as shaping; task practice is closer to real life and may surface grief about lost skills. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "Doing a whole task like that can bring back what you used to do easily. What came up for you?" [synthesis]

A3. Constraint of the less-affected arm

Purpose: prevent the person from defaulting to the stronger arm so that the weaker arm is used. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006]
What the team does: a padded safety mitt on the less-affected hand for most waking hours during the treatment period (a published target of 90% of waking hours); agreed in the behavioural contract, with mitt-off activities (e.g. for safety) specified. The developers call restraint the least important element and count any method that keeps the person using the affected arm as constraint. In expanded CIMT it is worn only when safe. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006; Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint]
Watch for: helplessness, embarrassment in public, dependence on others while wearing it, falls risk, temptation to remove it — explore, then route safety concerns to the team. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "Wearing the mitt in public can feel exposing. What would help you keep it on, and when does your therapist say it's fine to take it off?" [synthesis]

A4. The transfer package

The developers describe the transfer package (TP) as a set of behavioural techniques in common use in behaviour analysis, used to transfer gains from the clinic into daily life; Morris, Taub & Mark (2006) present them as adherence-enhancing behavioural strategies. Taub et al.'s 2013 components trial (Stroke 2013;44:1383–1388) tested the TP in 40 people with chronic mild-to-moderate arm weakness. With the TP, gains in real-world arm use on the Motor Activity Log were about 2.4 times those without it and lasted to one year. The TP also added to laboratory motor gains, while the type of training (shaping vs. repetitive task practice) made no difference to real-world use. In that trial the TP took about half an hour a day, and the authors note it needs no extra therapist time. The groups with the TP also wore the mitt for most waking hours, while the others wore it only during sessions, so the two effects are confounded. Components as published [source: Taub et al. 2013 (full text); Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006; Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint]:

Daily Motor Activity Log (MAL): a structured interview in which the person rates how much and how well the more-affected arm was used in a list of important daily activities; given daily during treatment and weekly by phone for the four weeks after. It is both an outcome measure and a feedback/accountability tool.
Home diary: the person records activities outside the clinic and whether the more-affected arm was used; reviewed each morning.
Problem solving: the person and therapist identify barriers to using the arm in daily life, generate solutions, and evaluate them (published examples: cutting food into smaller pieces, building up a door knob).
Behavioural contract: a formal signed agreement, completed at the end of the first day, sorting daily activities into mitt-on, mitt-off and modified categories.
Caregiver contract: a signed agreement by the caregiver to be present when the mitt is worn and to help with the home programme.
Home skill assignment / home practice: daily selection of daily-living tasks to do at home with the weaker arm (published: a mix of easier and harder tasks), or repetitive arm tasks with household objects; home practice continues indefinitely after treatment.
Daily schedule: a detailed record of the day's activities, mitt on/off times, rest periods and meals.
Weekly phone contacts after treatment: continued problem solving and MAL in the first month after the course. In the 2013 trial's second study, these calls on their own (without the rest of the TP) increased real-world arm use at six months, but by one year the advantage had faded. [source: Taub et al. 2013]
Watch for (psychotherapist): the transfer package asks for constant self-monitoring and visible accountability to a therapist and a family member. This can motivate, or can feel shaming, controlling or exhausting. Notice which, and help the client talk to the therapist about it. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "How is filling in the diary every day going? If it feels like a report card, that's worth telling your OT." [synthesis]

A5. Assessment and outcome tools

The MAL (real-world use) and the Wolf Motor Function Test (lab motor ability) have published manuals on the UAB site; a paediatric MAL and paediatric arm function test exist for children. These are therapist-administered; do not reproduce or administer them yourself. [source: UAB training manuals page]
Purpose / when: to understand the measures the team uses before, during and after the course, so you can talk about results with the client. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "Your therapist will ask how much and how well you used your arm this week. Those answers are part of how they track progress." [synthesis]
Watch for: low scores read as personal failure; bring the client's own goals back into view. [synthesis]

A6. Variants (named, not followed here)

Expanded CIMT for plegic hands (adds orthotics, neurodevelopmental tone-management techniques, EMG-triggered functional electrical stimulation and bimanual practice); pediatric CI therapy; tele-rehabilitation / AutoCITE (automated in-home delivery with reduced therapist supervision). Publications on each appear on the UAB page; the UAB group has also extended the "CI" approach to cognition (Constraint-Induced Cognitive Therapy, a pilot trial in long-COVID brain fog). [source: UAB training manuals page; Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint]
Purpose / when: to recognise which version a client has been offered, since services may deliver expanded, paediatric, remote or modified forms. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "Do you know which version of the programme they've offered you, and how many hours it involves? Let's ask so you can plan." [synthesis]
Watch for: confusion between versions; expectations based on a different form than the one offered. [synthesis]

Part B — The psychotherapist's interventions

The UAB sources cited do not describe a psychotherapist's role; everything in Part B is [synthesis] built around the published protocol, unless a source tag says otherwise.

B1. Recognising a possible candidate and referring

Purpose: clients with chronic arm weakness after stroke or other brain injury who "don't use" the arm may not know an intensive option exists.
Steps: (1) Ask how the weaker arm is used in daily life versus what it can do when tried. (2) If there is some active wrist and finger movement and the client is interested, suggest they ask their physician, neurologist or physiatrist, physiotherapist or occupational therapist whether CI therapy or a modified form is suitable and available. (3) Do not judge motor eligibility yourself; eligibility criteria are set by the rehab service (see section 1). (4) Offer to write a letter, with consent, describing mood, cognition and motivation.
Example language (illustrative): "Some people find the arm can do more than they let it. There is an intensive rehab approach for exactly that. Would you like to ask your physio or OT whether it would suit you?"
Watch for: false hope ("it will cure my arm"); explain that suitability and benefit are for the rehab team to assess.

B2. Psychoeducation on learned non-use

Purpose: reduce self-blame and give a behavioural explanation that makes the hard work make sense.
Steps: (1) Explain in plain words the idea that after injury failed attempts with the weak arm are discouraging and the strong arm takes over, so the weak arm is used less than it could be. [source for the concept: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006] (2) Link it to the client's own story (spills, giving up on buttons). (3) Frame the course as relearning use, not testing worth. (4) Keep claims about outcomes to what the team has told the client.
Example language (illustrative): "Your arm learned to stay out of the way because using it kept going badly. The programme tries to make using it pay off again."
Watch for: hearing it as "you weren't trying"; correct that explicitly.

B3. Supporting informed consent and shared decision-making

Purpose: the programme is demanding in time, effort, cost and family involvement; the UAB clinic expects the person to apply for themselves and commit. [source: UAB FAQ]
Steps: (1) Help the client list what the course involves as the team has described it (daily hours, mitt wear, home practice, diaries, contracts, travel, companion). (2) Explore values and current capacity (mood, fatigue, caregiving, work). (3) Help them prepare questions for the team (expected benefit for someone like me, what if I cannot keep the mitt on, what happens with pain or falls, costs). (4) Respect a decision to defer or decline.
Example language (illustrative): "What would make this worth it for you, and what would make it too much right now?"
Watch for: a family pushing harder than the client wants; a depressed client agreeing to please others.

B4. Pre-treatment screening and readiness work

Purpose: identify psychological factors that may make the intensive phase unsafe or unworkable and address them first.
Steps: (1) Use your usual validated screening for depression, anxiety and suicidality, adapted for aphasia or cognitive impairment (involve speech and language therapy where communication is affected). (2) Ask about fatigue, sleep, pain, apathy and previous rehab experiences. (3) With consent, share relevant findings with the team, who decide on timing. (4) If depression is significant, advise review by the client's physician alongside psychological treatment (never advising on medicines).
Example language (illustrative): "Intensive rehab takes a lot of energy. Can we check how your mood and sleep are, so the team can plan with you?"
Watch for: hopelessness, passive death wishes, or withdrawal — follow standard suicide risk assessment and safety planning.

B5. Aligning with the transfer package (motivation and adherence)

Purpose: support, not duplicate, the team's behavioural adherence methods.
Steps: (1) Ask the client to bring their own understanding of the behavioural contract and home tasks (do not rewrite them). (2) Use motivational interviewing to explore ambivalence about mitt wear and home practice. (3) Help translate barriers into specific problems the client can take to the therapist's problem-solving session. (4) Reinforce effort and use, not only results. (5) Agree with the client what you may share with the team.
Example language (illustrative): "Part of you wants to keep the mitt on, part of you hates it. Tell me about both." / "That sounds like a problem worth taking to your OT tomorrow — what would you say?"
Watch for: you becoming a second enforcer; keep a supportive, autonomy-respecting stance and leave contract changes to the team.

B6. Working with frustration, fatigue and failure during the course

Purpose: frustration and fatigue are expected (the UAB clinic notes this and gives rest breaks). [source: UAB FAQ]
Steps: (1) Normalise. (2) Teach brief regulation skills usable between trials (paced breathing, self-talk, defusion from "I'm useless"). (3) Use the shaping logic for mood: notice small gains. (4) Encourage the client to tell the therapist when tasks feel too hard; task difficulty is the therapist's call. (5) Schedule your contact around fatigue (short, perhaps by phone).
Example language (illustrative): "Failing a step is part of how shaping works — the task is meant to sit just beyond you."
Watch for: catastrophic reactions, tearfulness that does not settle, anger at the family or staff.

B7. Working with the caregiver and family

Purpose: the caregiver contract and companion are part of the method. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; UAB FAQ]
Steps: (1) Offer a joint session about roles: encourage, do not take over; agree how to respond when the client asks for help. (2) Address caregiver strain and the risk of conflict or criticism around mitt wear. (3) Signpost caregiver support.
Example language (illustrative): "Your job these weeks is to stand back more than usual — which is hard when you love someone."
Watch for: coercion, criticism, overprotection, and any sign of abuse or neglect (follow safeguarding duties).

B8. Monitoring and passing on warning signs

Purpose: the psychotherapist may hear things the team does not.
Steps: (1) Ask about pain, falls or near-falls with the mitt on, exhaustion, new neurological symptoms, skin problems from the mitt. (2) Pass these to the rehab team or physician promptly (urgently for any new stroke-like symptoms — emergency services). (3) Record what you passed on.
Example language (illustrative): "That fall matters — can we call your therapist together now?"
Watch for: clients minimising problems to avoid being stopped.

B9. After the course: maintenance, adjustment and relapse prevention

Purpose: the published protocol continues home practice indefinitely and phones weekly for a month; afterwards the person is on their own. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006]
Steps: (1) Review gains and residual limits; grieve what did not change. (2) Help build habits that keep the weaker arm in daily use (cues, routines, linking to valued activities) in line with the home programme the team provided. (3) Plan for lapses: what to do if use drops (contact the team; re-read the home programme). (4) Continue treatment for post-stroke depression, anxiety or adjustment as needed.
Example language (illustrative): "Which two everyday jobs will belong to your weaker arm from now on?"
Watch for: post-programme low mood (loss of structure and contact), drop-off in use, disappointment.

B10. Integrating psychological care before, during and after

Purpose: coordinate one plan.
Steps: (1) Before: readiness, consent, mood, family. (2) During: brief, practical, regulation-focused contact; avoid starting heavy trauma or exposure work during the intensive weeks. (3) After: maintenance and deeper work. (4) Keep communication channels with the team agreed in writing, with consent.
Watch for: competing demands on the client's limited energy.
Example language (illustrative): "During the intensive weeks, let's keep our sessions short and practical; the deeper work can wait until the course is over." [synthesis]

5. Handling problems

The UAB sources address adherence mainly through the transfer package (contracts, diaries, problem solving, phone follow-up) and note frustration, fatigue and the value of a companion. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; Taub et al. 2006; UAB FAQ] The psychological responses below are [synthesis] unless tagged.

Non-adherence to mitt wear or home practice. Explore ambivalence without judgement; identify the specific barrier (embarrassment, safety, boredom, dependence, family conflict); help the client bring it to the therapist's problem-solving session, which is the protocol's own route. Do not negotiate changes to the contract yourself. [source for problem solving and contracts: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; synthesis for the rest]
Travelling or living alone. The clinic reports that people without a companion often struggle with home tasks and mitt wear; help plan support before the course, and flag the issue to the team. [source: UAB FAQ; synthesis]
Stuck or plateaued progress. Distinguish motor plateau (the therapist's domain) from discouragement; reframe around real-world use rather than test scores; help the client ask the team what the data show.
Overwhelm and exhaustion. Encourage the client to report it to the therapist (rest breaks are part of the clinic's practice); reduce your own session load; teach brief recovery strategies; escalate if fatigue suggests a medical problem. [source for rest breaks: UAB FAQ; synthesis]
Low mood, hopelessness or emerging depression. Assess properly, including suicide risk with standard practice and safety planning; communicate (with consent) to the team and the client's physician; the intensive course may need to be deferred — that is the team's and client's decision.
Shame and self-criticism triggered by feedback or diaries. Normalise; reframe the diary as information, not a report card; encourage the client to tell the therapist what kind of feedback helps.
Grief and disappointment when gains are limited. Allow grief; separate worth from function; support adjustment and valued activity with the abilities that exist.
Rupture with the rehab therapist or with you. Name it; help the client voice concerns directly; avoid taking sides; if the client wants to stop, explore, then support them to discuss it with the team.
Family conflict over the contract. Joint session; clarify roles; watch for coercion or caregiver burnout; safeguarding if needed.
Cognitive or communication impairment (e.g. aphasia). The 2006 trial excluded major cognitive deficit and aphasia preventing valid testing; where clients are treated, adapt your materials (short sentences, written cues, pictures) and involve speech and language therapy and family. [source for exclusions: Taub et al. 2006; synthesis]
Safety events (falls, pain, skin problems, new neurological symptoms). Stop and refer promptly to the team or physician; emergency services for possible new stroke. The mitt is to be worn only when safe in the expanded protocol. [source: Uswatte et al. eCIMT preprint; synthesis]
Unrealistic expectations or seeking a "cure". Correct gently with what the team has said; hope is realistic only within individual assessment.
After the course: drop-off in use. Use relapse-prevention planning; encourage use of the team's home programme; suggest a team review if use declines. The developers note that CI therapy without a physical restraint showed a larger decline at two-year follow-up in one comparison — maintenance matters. [source: Morris, Taub & Mark 2006; synthesis]
Cost and access. The UAB clinic is fee-for-service and does not mention insurance on its FAQ; help the client weigh financial strain and ask about local, modified or insured options. [source: UAB FAQ; synthesis]

Sources

Online sources:

Papers cited by author, year, title (opened as linked above; abstract only where stated):

Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW, DeLuca SC, Miller NE. 1994. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 61(2):281–293 (abstract opened via repository record).
Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM, Barman J, Bowman MH, Bryson C, Delgado A, Bishop-McKay S. 2013. Method for enhancing real-world use of a more-affected arm in chronic stroke: transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 44(5):1383–1388 (full text opened).
Wolf SL, et al. 2006. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296(17):2095–2104 (details from the NICHD release).

Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. 2023. National Clinical Guideline for Stroke for the UK and Ireland (cited via Stockley et al. 2025). Still not verified [uncertain]: the guideline's exact CIMT recommendation wording and criteria; any ESO guideline recommendation on CIMT; US licensing details for physical and occupational therapists.

← Previous · IX-058Speech and language therapy Next · IX-060 →Mirror therapy (Ramachandran)