Songwriting and lyric-analysis therapy

1. Introduction

Version followed: therapeutic songwriting as defined by Felicity Baker (Baker 2015, definition as quoted in DeRusso 2020 and Cugnetto 2016), with the Tamplin, Baker et al. 12-session identity songwriting protocol (Tamplin et al., Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, c. 2015) as the worked multi-session model, O'Callaghan's 11-step songwriting protocol (as reported by Pastor et al. 2022) as the single-song procedure, and song discussion / lyric analysis as framed by Gardstrom & Hiller (2010), Hiller (2019) and Dvorak (2017; abstract only).

What it is: not one manualised therapy but two related music-therapy methods often combined. Therapeutic songwriting is the process of "creating, notating and/or recording lyrics and music" by client and therapist within a therapeutic relationship, to meet psychosocial, emotional, cognitive and communication needs (Baker 2015, quoted in Cugnetto 2016). Song discussion (lyric analysis) is a receptive method in which therapist and client listen to a pre-chosen song and then talk about its meaning and its links to the client's life (Gardstrom & Hiller 2010). [source: Cugnetto 2016; DeRusso 2020; Gardstrom & Hiller 2010 abstract]
How change is thought to happen: (a) the song gives a socially acceptable container for a story that is hard to tell in conversation; Baker is quoted that it is "more socially acceptable to share your story of abuse in a song" (Cugnetto 2016); (b) music lets intense or ambivalent emotion be expressed and moved toward climax and resolution (Cugnetto 2016); (c) in identity work, writing songs about past, present and future selves acts as a series of micro-narratives that help build an integrated macro-narrative, supported by music's links with memory, emotion and reward, and by preserved musical identity (Tamplin et al.); (d) in song discussion, change works through the client's identification with and empathy for the song, which makes it a projective method (Gardstrom & Hiller 2010). The finished song is also a tangible record the client can keep and share (Cugnetto 2016). [source: as cited]
Professional frame: these are music-therapy methods. In the US the credential is MT-BC (Certification Board for Music Therapists; the authors Krout and Dvorak sign as MT-BC); in the UK music therapist is a protected title regulated by the HCPC, with BAMT as professional body; Australia registers music therapists (RMT) through its national music therapy association. [uncertain: registration details not checked against regulator pages in this research]. A psychotherapist without music-therapy training can use simple song discussion and lyric writing as an adjunct to talk therapy, but should not present it as music therapy, and should refer to or co-work with a credentialled music therapist for music creation, recording, neurological populations and trauma processing through music. [synthesis]

2. Framework

There is no single phase model across the field. Three published structures are usable as templates; name which one you are following in your notes. [source: DeRusso 2020; Tamplin et al.; Pastor et al. 2022]

A. Multi-session identity songwriting (Tamplin, Baker et al.)

Format: individual, 12 sessions, twice weekly, about 60 minutes, over 6 weeks; three songs, one per phase; developed for adults with acquired brain injury or spinal cord injury in early rehabilitation. [source: Tamplin et al.; Baker et al. 2015 Frontiers]
Phase 1, sessions 1–4: past (pre-injury) self. Phase 2, sessions 5–8: present self and the changes caused by injury. Phase 3, sessions 9–12: future self. [source: Tamplin et al.]
Each phase repeats four steps: (1) rapport, musical identity and storytelling; (2) pulling ideas for words and music from the notes; (3) completing the song after between-session reflection; (4) final recording and reflection on whether the song captures the self at this point. [source: Tamplin et al.]
Each song aims to touch six self-concept domains: physical, personal, social, family, academic/vocational, moral/spiritual (after Fitts and Warren). [source: Tamplin et al.; Baker et al. 2015]
Moving on: the phase ends when the song is recorded and the client has reflected on it; it is time-bounded (four sessions) rather than criterion-based. The authors note that the middle phase (present self) often brings more conflict and a sense of "not being myself", which they treat as a possible turning point, not a reason to stop. [source: Tamplin et al.]
Selection: the authors required intact executive function and insight into disability, excluded people with aphasia (people with severe dysarthria or dyspraxia could take part with alternative communication), and cautioned against use with people who are emotionally fragile or unstable or whose anxiety or depression may worsen. [source: Tamplin et al.]

B. Single-song process (O'Callaghan's 11 steps, palliative care origin)

Offer songwriting → choose a topic → brainstorm → group ideas into related areas → offer major or minor key → choose rhythmic features → choose mood or style → melody (therapist offers a choice of two melodic fragments) → choose accompaniment → choose a title → record if possible. Can be completed in one or several sessions. [source: Pastor et al. 2022, citing O'Callaghan via Aldridge 1998; original not drawn on]

C. Single-session and short group formats

Group blues songwriting and group lyric analysis have been delivered as single sessions in detoxification and acute psychiatric units, where patients are discharged quickly; the short, predefined 12-bar form lets a whole song be finished in one session. [source: DeRusso 2020, citing Silverman 2012–2016; Silverman 2015 abstract]
Song discussion follows four decision stages: song selection, preparation, presentation, facilitation of discussion. [source: Gardstrom & Hiller 2010 abstract]
Survey data: fill-in-the-blank is the most common songwriting method; individual work predominates in psychiatry, group work in aged care, developmental disability and substance use; neurorehabilitation clinicians typically use four or more sessions; clients more often own the lyrics in oncology/palliative care, neurorehabilitation and psychiatry, therapists more in aged care, autism and developmental disability. [source: DeRusso 2020 summarising Baker et al. 2008]

Choosing structure level [synthesis]

Match structure to capacity: more structure (fill-in-the-blank, parody, blues) for low energy, cognitive impairment, short stays, children or anxious beginners; less structure (original songwriting, improvisation-to-song) for clients with more capacity, time and wish for ownership. Increase client control as confidence grows.

3. Guiding principles

Client ownership and control: give the client as much control over words and music as possible. Practical meaning: offer choices, do not impose; you carry the craft, they decide. [source: Tamplin et al.]
Authenticity: the song must represent the client's story truthfully. Practical meaning: write down their words verbatim and use their phrases in the lyrics. [source: Tamplin et al.; Baker et al. 2015]
The song as focus: the song keeps self-reflection on track across sessions. Practical meaning: redirect digressions back to "what belongs in this song". [source: Tamplin et al.]
Structure fits the person: predefined forms keep clients on task and shift effort to lyrics. Practical meaning: use blues, parody or fill-in-the-blank when time or capacity is short. [source: DeRusso 2020]
Alliance before depth: spend the first session on conversation and musical identity, not composition. Practical meaning: no writing pressure in session 1. [source: Tamplin et al.]
Music carries meaning too: in song discussion the music, not just the lyrics, shapes meaning. Practical meaning: listen to the recording yourself before using it and ask about the sound, not only the words. [source: Hiller 2019 abstract]
Projective stance in discussion: the client's reading of the song is about them. Practical meaning: ask what they hear; do not teach the "correct" meaning. [source: Gardstrom & Hiller 2010 abstract] Song discussion is not a validated assessment tool: what a client reads into a song is material to explore with them, not evidence of a diagnosis or of past events [synthesis].
Watch countertransference: your attachment to a song can distort the discussion. Practical meaning: avoid choosing songs because you love them; notice your reactions. [source: Gardstrom & Hiller 2010 abstract]
Stay in the music and keep it simple. Practical meaning: return to playing or singing when talk stalls; simple chords are enough. [source: Pastor et al. 2022, quoting their supervisor]
Avoid tunes with negative associations: do not use well-known tunes that may carry negative associations for the client. [source: Pastor et al. 2022 citing Baker & Wigram 2005]
Not for everyone: consider alternatives when a client cannot express feelings through words. [source: Pastor et al. 2022 citing Baker 2005]
Safety around music: check for musical trauma triggers (songs linked to an abuser, an assault, a death, war, music used in coercion or torture, a religious community left under duress) and keep listening and playback volumes moderate. [synthesis]

4. Intervention inventory

Scope note: Baker's 2015 book describes many more named methods than are covered here; the inventory below covers every technique found in the sources. Methods only named (not described) in the sources are marked [uncertain] and their steps are [synthesis]. Example language is illustrative throughout.

Part A: Songwriting

4.1 Offering songwriting and exploring musical identity

Purpose / when: first contact; builds rapport and finds the genres that will carry the client's story. [source: Tamplin et al.; Pastor et al. 2022 (O'Callaghan step 1)]
Steps: (1) Explain the idea in plain terms and that no musical skill is needed. (2) Ask about favourite genres, artists and songs and what they mean. (3) Optionally listen together to one or two meaningful recordings. (4) Do not start writing in session 1 unless the client pulls toward it. [source: Tamplin et al.; synthesis for wording of step 1]
Example language (illustrative): "We could put some of what you're going through into a song. You don't need to sing well or play anything; I'll handle the music side and you'll make the decisions." "What music has been with you through different parts of your life?"
Watch for: shame about voice or musical ability; songs that arouse distress (note them as possible triggers, not as material to push). Working sign: client names music with energy and starts telling stories around it. [synthesis]

4.2 Storytelling with verbatim note-taking (brainstorming)

Purpose / when: gather raw lyric material in the client's own words; also O'Callaghan's "brainstorm" step after a topic is chosen. [source: Tamplin et al.; Pastor et al. 2022]
Steps: (1) Invite the story for this song's topic or time period. (2) Write down what the client says, verbatim where possible. (3) Ask clarifying questions and invite expansion. (4) In identity work, check the six domains on a prompt sheet and probe the ones not yet covered. (5) Keep journals or between-session notes as a source if the client wishes (Nagarsheth 2010, cited by Pastor et al.). [source: Tamplin et al.; Pastor et al. 2022]
Example language (illustrative): "Say that again, I want the exact words." Domain probe of the kind the authors describe: asking about the client's role as a working person or breadwinner, and whether they feel they are a good person (Tamplin et al., paraphrased).
Watch for: you tidying their words into your own idiom (loss of authenticity); flooding when a story is told for the first time. Working sign: vivid concrete phrases, images and feelings appear. [source: Tamplin et al.; synthesis for flooding]

4.3 Choosing a topic and grouping ideas

Purpose / when: turn brainstormed material into song sections. [source: Pastor et al. 2022 (O'Callaghan steps 2–4); Tamplin et al. session 2]
Steps: (1) Agree on one topic or message. (2) Read the notes back aloud together. (3) Group related ideas (e.g. by domain or feeling) into potential verses; identify a central idea for a chorus. (4) Let the client choose what stays and what goes. [source: Pastor et al. 2022; Tamplin et al.; chorus-as-central-idea is synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "These three lines are all about your kids. Is that one verse? Which line feels like the heart of the whole song?"
Watch for: client deferring every choice to you; offer two options instead of open questions. [synthesis]

4.4 Fill-in-the-blank

Purpose / when: the most common songwriting method in practice (Baker et al. 2008 via DeRusso); used with older adults with dementia (memory, orientation, language, attention, judgment targets) and wherever high structure is needed. [source: DeRusso 2020]
Steps [synthesis; the sources name but do not describe the procedure]: (1) Choose a familiar song or simple frame with a repeated structure. (2) Replace selected words or line endings with blanks. (3) Sing up to the blank and pause; accept the client's word or phrase. (4) Write it in, sing the line back with the new word. (5) Repeat across verses; sing the whole result.
Example language (illustrative): "Today I feel ___ — what word goes there?" (sung).
Watch for: blanks so open they stall the client, or so closed they are a memory test. Working sign: personal words replace generic ones as the song goes on.

4.5 Song parody (rewriting the words of an existing song)

Purpose / when: keep a familiar melody and write new personal words; used e.g. with mothers of preterm infants in NICU dyads (Ettenberger & Beltrán Ardila 2018, via DeRusso). [source: Cugnetto 2016; DeRusso 2020]
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Client chooses a song they like and that has no negative associations for them. (2) Sing or play it through; mark the line structure and rhyme points. (3) Rewrite line by line, keeping syllable count roughly to the melody. (4) Sing the new version. (5) If it will be recorded or shared beyond the session, consider copyright (see 4.16).
Example language (illustrative): "Let's keep this tune and make the words about you and your baby."
Watch for: a tune tied to a painful memory (Baker & Wigram 2005, via Pastor et al.). [source as cited]

4.6 Song collage, mash-up and sampling

Purpose / when: reconfigure existing songs (lines, phrases or recordings) into a new piece; low writing demand. Named in Music Therapy Applications (Yinger) and by Baker in Cugnetto 2016. [uncertain: steps not described in the sources]
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Client brings or chooses several songs that speak to the theme. (2) Pick lines or short clips that resonate. (3) Arrange them in an order that tells their story; add own lines where wanted. (4) Read or play the collage and discuss the arc.
Watch for: the selection itself is projective data; ask why each fragment was chosen.

4.7 Blues (12-bar) songwriting

Purpose / when: short, predefined form that keeps clients on task, puts the focus on lyrics, and allows a full song in one session; used in detox and acute psychiatric groups (Silverman), and relevant for children and adolescents (Baker et al. 2008). Baker describes the blues as moving from a sad theme to a resolution. [source: DeRusso 2020; Cugnetto 2016]
Steps [structure of the blues stanza is general music knowledge, not taken from a source: uncertain; group steps synthesis]: (1) Name the "blues" (the problem) as a group. (2) Write a first line stating it; the 12-bar form typically repeats that line, then answers it with a third line. (3) Write several verses; aim later verses toward coping or resolution. (4) Therapist plays the 12-bar progression; group sings. (5) Optionally add psychoeducation content to the verses (Silverman added psychoeducation in 2 of 4 studies, via DeRusso).
Example language (illustrative): "What's got you down this week? Say it as one line, we'll sing it twice, and then you answer it."
Watch for: verses that stay hopeless; prompt the answer line toward what helps. Working sign: humour, shared lines, resolution verse written by members.

4.8 Original songwriting within known structures

Purpose / when: client creates both words and music in a familiar form (e.g. verse-and-refrain/ABAB); more ownership; for clients with time and capacity. [source: Yinger, Music Therapy Applications; Pastor et al. 2022 citing Baker & Wigram 2005]
Steps: follow 4.2–4.3 for lyrics, then 4.9 for music; the therapist may add structure by repeating verses, words or phrases, and may need to hold melodic fragments in memory while the client composes. [source: Pastor et al. 2022 citing Baker & Wigram 2005 p. 100]

4.9 Music creation through structured choices

Purpose / when: lets non-musicians make real musical decisions. [source: Pastor et al. 2022 (O'Callaghan steps 5–10); Tamplin et al.]
Steps: (1) Offer major or minor key (play both). (2) Choose rhythmic feel. (3) Choose mood or style/genre (client chooses where possible). (4) Melody: offer two short melodic options and let the client pick; or sing a line two ways, ending up or down, and ask which fits (Tamplin et al. example). (5) Choose accompaniment and instrumentation. (6) Choose a title. [source as cited]
Example language (illustrative): "Listen to these two — [sings each] — which one sounds more like how you felt?"
Watch for: genre as a vehicle for safe expression; in the Tamplin case, a blues setting let a man express grief and anger "without challenging his masculinity" (paraphrased). Working sign: the client starts correcting your offers.

4.10 Improvisation-to-song

Purpose / when: when a meaningful topic arises during free playing, especially with children. [source: Pastor et al. 2022, case 2]
Steps: (1) Client improvises (e.g. piano) while you give harmonic support. (2) When a theme surfaces, invite making a song of it. (3) Client speaks a line; you sing it back with accompaniment; client repeats. (4) Help the client find a clear ending (Baker & Wigram 2005 p. 38, cited). (5) Record or note it, since unrecorded music is lost. [source: Pastor et al. 2022]

4.11 Sung questions and building a song around a hard word

Purpose / when: a child or adult who finds speaking hard but singing easier. [source: Pastor et al. 2022, case 1]
Steps: (1) Open with a welcome song. (2) Sing questions with harmonic support. (3) Build a short song around the word the client is reluctant to say, using repetition so they can sing it. [source as cited]

4.12 Song narrative (sprechgesang / spoken song)

Purpose / when: lyrics delivered in rhythmic, chant-like style over a chord progression; low melodic demand. [source: Pastor et al. 2022, case 3]
Steps: (1) Ask simple questions over a steady progression. (2) Shift harmony (e.g. major to minor, added dissonance) to match emerging emotion. (3) Close with a familiar song chosen by the client. [source as cited]

4.13 Rap (freestyle or crafted)

Purpose / when: named by Baker as a songwriting technique; useful where rap is the client's musical language. [source: Cugnetto 2016; steps not described: uncertain]
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Choose or make a beat. (2) Brainstorm lines as in 4.2. (3) Crafted: write and edit verses; freestyle: improvise over the beat, recording to capture lines. (4) Perform and review.
Watch for: violent or self-harm content; explore meaning rather than censoring, and assess risk if content suggests intent (see 5).

4.14 Group songwriting on a shared theme (including acrostic)

Purpose / when: groups with a common issue; builds cohesion, pride and competence. [source: Pastor et al. 2022, citing Cordobés 1997 and Edgerton 1990]
Steps: (1) Group names common issues and agrees on one theme. (2) Write every idea down as lyric material. (3) Optional acrostic: pick a key word (in the published example, "Freedom", the opposite of how the group felt that day) and build lines from its letters. (4) Offer a choice of major or minor; play an open chord; each member writes a verse. (5) Record with everyone's permission. (6) Close with feedback and reinforcement to consolidate pride and competence. Online delivery is possible, with the therapist recording the music. [source as cited]
Example language (illustrative): "Each of you take one letter and one line. There's no wrong line."
Watch for: dominant members writing for everyone; quieter members' lines dropped. Working sign: members defend and refine each other's lines. [synthesis]

4.15 Bracketing

Purpose / when: in multi-song identity work, keep each song within its time frame. [source: Tamplin et al.]
Steps: (1) When an idea belongs to another time period (e.g. a future hope during the past-self song), name it. (2) Write it on a separate list for the relevant song. (3) Return to the current song. [source as cited]
Example language (illustrative): "That sounds like it belongs in your future song. I'll save it for then."

4.16 Between-session reflection and revision

Purpose / when: lets the client live with the draft and own changes. [source: Tamplin et al.]
Steps: (1) Record a rough audio of early ideas on a phone or digital recorder. (2) Send audio and lyric sheet home (email or paper). (3) Next session, ask what to change: wording, order, melody. (4) Add verses, chorus and instrumentation. Tamplin et al. typically finished a song in session 3 and gave the client an audio and updated lyrics. [source as cited]
Watch for: distress on re-listening at home; agree beforehand when and where they will listen and what they will do if it stirs them up. Confidentiality of files on shared devices. [synthesis]

4.17 Recording, production and sharing

Purpose / when: validates the journey and gives a lasting product; songs can be shared with family, communities and decision-makers. [source: Tamplin et al.; Pastor et al. 2022; Cugnetto 2016]
Steps: (1) Choose an acoustic version (voice with guitar or piano) or a produced version in software such as GarageBand, with the client deciding instrumentation, harmonies and levels. (2) Record only with explicit permission (in groups, from every member). (3) Reflect on whether the song captures the client's sense of self now. [source: Tamplin et al.; Pastor et al. 2022]
Consent, ownership and copyright [synthesis; uncertain on law, check local rules and your service policy]: agree in writing who keeps copies, where files are stored, and whether the song may be played to family, staff, or published; the client normally keeps creative ownership of their words; parodies and samples of commercial songs are usually fine within private sessions but may raise copyright issues if published or uploaded. Revisit consent before any public sharing, because a song that felt shareable in hospital may not later.
Hearing safety [synthesis]: keep headphone and monitor levels moderate and sessions with amplified playback short; set volume before the client puts headphones on; for clients with brain injury, hyperacusis, tinnitus or autism, start quiet and let them control the volume.

4.18 Reflecting on the finished song

Purpose / when: consolidate meaning after each song. [source: Tamplin et al.; Baker et al. 2015]
Steps: (1) Listen together to the final version. (2) Ask whether it captures who they are at this point. (3) Explore alternative meanings and what changed in the telling. In the authors' account the therapist supports grief, challenges self-views and suggests alternative perspectives (hypothesised mediating role). [source: Tamplin et al.; Baker et al. 2015]
Example language (illustrative): "Hearing it now, is this you? What would you say to the man in this song?"
Watch for: rise in anxiety or negative feeling. Baker et al. (2015) found meaningfulness linked with more anxiety and less emotional suppression, which they read as possible acceptance of emotion; one participant withdrew because the measures were too confronting. Monitor, do not assume deterioration or progress. [source: Baker et al. 2015]

4.19 Three-song identity protocol (package)

Purpose / when: integration of pre-injury and post-injury self after acquired neurological injury; adaptable (with care) to other identity disruptions such as illness, migration or loss [adaptation: synthesis]. [source: Tamplin et al.; Baker et al. 2015]
Steps: run 4.1–4.3, 4.9, 4.15–4.18 three times: past self (sessions 1–4), present self (5–8), future self (9–12); cover the six domains in each song. In the published case, a 46-year-old shearer with spinal cord injury wrote a country song about being a family man, a blues about grief, anger and loss with dark humour, and a slow rock ballad combining fear with hope about rebuilding. [source: Tamplin et al.]
Watch for: present-self phase conflict (see 2A); screening criteria in 2A.

4.20 Psychoeducational songwriting

Purpose / when: combine coping or illness knowledge with songwriting; Silverman used blues songwriting with psychoeducation and family-based educational music therapy in psychiatric settings. [source: DeRusso 2020 summarising Silverman 2013, 2014; procedure: uncertain]
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Teach one short concept (e.g. warning signs, a coping skill). (2) Ask the group to put it in their own words as lyrics, usually in blues form. (3) Sing it; ask how each would use it this week.

Part B: Song discussion / lyric analysis

4.21 Song selection

Purpose / when: the key decision in song discussion; the song must be clinically relevant to the client or group. [source: Gardstrom & Hiller 2010 abstract; Hiller 2019 abstract; Guillard 2023 abstract]
Steps: (1) Decide who chooses: client-chosen songs carry personal meaning; therapist-chosen songs target a theme [synthesis]. (2) Weigh lyric, musical and non-musical features against the client's clinical profile; Guillard (2023) proposes a 30-dimension checklist for adolescents covering all three (items: uncertain). (3) Check for indications and contraindications for this client now (Guillard 2023 abstract). (4) Screen for triggers: lyrics or sound linked to trauma, self-harm, substance use glamour, or a specific person or event; and ask the client before using songs tied to a death or abuser [synthesis].
Watch for: choosing songs because you like them (countertransference, 4.26).

4.22 Therapist preparation: phenomenological listening

Purpose / when: before the session, understand how the music, not just the words, may carry meaning. [source: Hiller 2019 abstract]
Steps: (1) Listen to the actual recording closely, more than once. (2) Note what you hear in the music (texture, tempo, voice, arrangement) and your own responses ("introspective interpretation"). (3) Consider several possible meanings. Hiller adapts Bruscia's Improvisation Assessment Profiles into an aural song-analysis model (details: uncertain). [source as cited]

4.23 Presentation

Purpose / when: the listening itself. [source: Gardstrom & Hiller 2010 abstract names the stage; specifics synthesis]
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Briefly frame the listening without telling the client what the song means. (2) Decide whether to give a lyric sheet (helps with hard-to-hear lyrics; can pull attention away from the music). (3) Play the recording or perform it live at a moderate volume. (4) Allow a short silence afterwards.
Example language (illustrative): "Just notice what stands out for you, a line, a sound, anything."

4.24 Facilitating discussion: five levels of processing

Purpose / when: structure the conversation from the music to the client's life; cognitive-behavioural framing, based on Kees and Jacobs's group exercise processing model. [source: Dvorak 2017 abstract]
Steps: prepare questions in advance for each level, then move through them according to responses: (1) Foundation — the music itself; (2) Reflection — on participants' responses; (3) Group process — effect on the group; (4) Personal insights; (5) Transfer — applying insights to their lives. [source: Dvorak 2017 abstract; level labels from source]
Example language (illustrative): L1 "What did you notice in the music?" L2 "Two of you picked the same line. What drew you to it?" L3 "What was it like hearing each other on this?" L4 "Where does that line touch your own life?" L5 "What's one thing from this you can take into tomorrow?"
Watch for: staying at level 1 (intellectualising) or jumping to level 4 too fast. Working sign: first-person statements and links to current life. [synthesis]

4.25 Single-session group lyric analysis

Purpose / when: short-stay units; Silverman's randomised study on a detox unit found one group lyric analysis session increased treatment motivation, with no difference between the two songs used ("Hurt" and "How to Save a Life"). [source: Silverman 2015 abstract]
Steps [synthesis]: run 4.21–4.24 compressed into one session; finish with a transfer statement each member can take to the next treatment step.

4.26 Monitoring countertransference

Purpose / when: throughout song discussion; therapist countertransference can have a negative impact. [source: Gardstrom & Hiller 2010 abstract]
Steps [synthesis]: notice strong reactions to a song or to a client's interpretation; avoid correcting their reading; take it to supervision.

4.27 Bridging from discussion to writing

Purpose / when: move from a received song to the client's own words. [synthesis]
Steps [synthesis]: after discussion, invite the client to rewrite one line or verse so it fits their story, then continue with 4.5 or 4.3.
Example language (illustrative): "If this were your song, how would that chorus go?"

5. Handling problems

The sources say little about problem management; most of this section is [synthesis] unless a source is given.

Client unfit for the method: the identity protocol excluded people with aphasia and required intact executive function and insight; the authors caution against use with emotionally fragile or unstable clients or where anxiety or depression may worsen; Baker advises alternatives when a client cannot express feelings in words. Response: screen first; offer song discussion, parody or fill-in-the-blank, non-verbal music therapy, or other modalities. [source: Tamplin et al.; Pastor et al. 2022 citing Baker 2005]
Stuck / blank page: move up the structure ladder (original → parody → blues → fill-in-the-blank); offer two choices instead of open questions; return to the story notes; "stay in the music" and play the progression while they think. [source for staying in music: Pastor et al. 2022; rest synthesis]
Perfectionism, shame about voice or skill: separate writing from performing; you sing, they decide; accept spoken or chanted delivery (4.12); remind them the song is not for an audience unless they choose. [synthesis]
Resistance or "songs are childish": let them pick the genre (rap, metal, country, blues); start with song discussion of their own music; frame it as making a record of their story, not an exercise. Genre can make expression feel safe, as with the blues in the Tamplin case. [source for genre point: Tamplin et al.; rest synthesis]
Overwhelm while telling the story or hearing the song: slow down, stop writing, ground (feet, breath, look around the room), shift to a calmer musical key or tempo, or bracket the material for later; end every session with containment and a plan. The middle (present-self) phase often brings conflict and a sense of "not being myself"; the authors read it as a possible turning point and reported no retraumatisation in their pilot, but they also had one dropout because measures were too confronting. [source: Tamplin et al.; Baker et al. 2015; grounding steps synthesis]
Trauma triggers in music: a song, genre, hymn, or even a chord colour may be linked to abuse, war, coercive groups or a death. Ask about music to avoid at intake; avoid well-known tunes with negative associations (Baker & Wigram, via Pastor et al.); if triggered, stop the music immediately, orient to the present, and do not resume that song; do not use trauma songs for deliberate exposure unless you are trained in a trauma-focused protocol and the client consents. [source as cited; rest synthesis]
Self-harm, suicide or violence in lyrics or in a chosen song: treat it as possible communication, not just art. Ask directly and calmly about current thoughts and intent; carry out your usual structured risk assessment and safety planning; do not ban the content but do not polish or perform it in a group without discussion. Avoid songs that glamorise suicide or substance use with at-risk groups. [synthesis]
Disclosure through a song (e.g. abuse in a child's lyrics): a song is not diagnostic evidence, but a disclosure in lyrics triggers the same safeguarding and mandatory-reporting duties as a spoken one. Record the client's own words, follow your safeguarding procedure, and do not interrogate through further songwriting. [synthesis]
Children and young people: get parental or carer consent and the child's assent, including separate consent for recording and sharing; explain confidentiality limits in age-appropriate language; use more structure and repetition; involve carers in hearing the song only if the young person agrees. [synthesis; Pastor et al. 2022 cases illustrate child adaptations]
Non-adherence (not listening to drafts, not bringing ideas): make homework optional; do the reflection in session; check whether listening at home was distressing or lacked privacy. [synthesis]
Ruptures: client feels you changed their words or took over the music. Name it, apologise, restore their wording, and give back control; go back to verbatim notes. Ownership is central to the method. [source for ownership principle: Tamplin et al.; repair steps synthesis]
Interpretation clashes in song discussion: the client reads a song very differently from you. Accept their reading as the clinical material; check your countertransference. [source: Gardstrom & Hiller 2010 abstract; rest synthesis]
Group problems: one member dominates or mocks; set ground rules (every line counts, no judging), give each member a fixed contribution (one verse or one acrostic letter), and require everyone's permission before recording. [synthesis; group steps from Pastor et al. 2022]
Short stays and cognitive limits: use single-session blues or lyric analysis formats designed for detox and acute wards; therapists hold more of the lyric work with dementia, autism and developmental disability. [source: DeRusso 2020; Silverman 2015 abstract]
Regret about a shared or recorded song: honour withdrawal of consent; delete or restrict copies where you can; revisit consent before every new audience. [synthesis]
Hearing and physical safety: keep volumes moderate, give clients volume control, take extra care with brain injury, tinnitus, hyperacusis and sensory sensitivity; position instruments and cables safely for wheelchair users. [synthesis]
Working outside your training: if a client needs musical work you cannot provide (complex arrangement, neurological rehabilitation goals, deep trauma processing through music), refer to or co-work with a credentialled music therapist. [synthesis]

Sources

Sources:

Further reading (not drawn on; content known only through the sources above) [uncertain]:

Baker, F. A. (2015). Therapeutic Songwriting: Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Baker, F. & Wigram, T. (Eds.) (2005). Songwriting: Methods, Techniques and Clinical Applications for Music Therapy Clinicians, Educators and Students. Jessica Kingsley.
O'Callaghan's songwriting protocol, cited by Pastor et al. (2022) via Aldridge (1998); original not drawn on.

← Previous · VIII-062Receptive music therapy and music medicine Next · VIII-064 →Hip Hop Therapy and Therapeutic Activity Groups