Kestenberg Movement Profile

1. Introduction

Version followed: the nine-category KMP as organised in Kestenberg Amighi, Loman & Sossin (eds.), The Meaning of Movement, 2nd ed. (Routledge, 2018), of which only the table of contents is used. The categories are described here from open sources: Koch (2011), the KMP community site (kestenbergmovementprofile.org), Kestenberg & Borowitz (1990), Lauffenburger (2003) and the Wikipedia summary. The book's chapter text is not drawn on, so category definitions below are paraphrased from those secondary sources [uncertain where flagged]. The 1st edition (Kestenberg Amighi, Loman, Lewis & Sossin, 1999) is the earlier version [source: Wikipedia reference list].

The Kestenberg Movement Profile (KMP) is not a therapy. It is a movement observation, notation and interpretation system with a developmental theory attached. Psychoanalyst Judith Kestenberg developed it, building on Laban's movement analysis. She began notating mother–infant movement in a 1953 pilot project, and the Sands Point Movement Study Group developed it further in the late 1950s and 1960s [source: KMP site, Center for Parents & Children; Fernandes 2009 abstract; Koch 2011]. Dance/movement therapists use it for assessment and to plan interventions. Its core idea of change has three parts. Movement qualities appear in a developmental sequence and reflect needs, affects, defences and ways of relating. Sharing a person's tension-flow rhythms ("attunement") builds empathy, and matching their growing and shrinking of body shape ("adjustment") builds trust and safety. Treatment identifies where a person's movement repertoire is limited or clashing and helps them toward the next developmental step, so that their repertoire widens [source: Koch 2011; KMP site; Lauffenburger 2003; Wikipedia]. Interventions drawn from the KMP are therefore dance/movement therapy (or parent–infant) interventions informed by a profile, not a separate treatment protocol [synthesis].

Professional frame. The KMP is taught at graduate level to dance/movement therapists [source: Wikipedia]. Its own analyst certification is run through the KMP community ("Get Certified" and "Certified KMP Analysts" pages, coordinated by Dr Melanie Johnson French). The requirements page is not drawn on, so its prerequisites, hours and exam are [uncertain] [source: KMP site, training-videos page]. One pilot study found that student raters given 45 hours of basic training rated inconsistently [source: Koch, Cruz & Goodill 2001]. So do not produce or interpret a formal KMP without certified training and supervision by a certified analyst. A dance/movement therapy credential is needed to use the profile clinically with movement interventions: in the USA, ADTA's R-DMT or BC-DMT; in the UK, ADMP UK registration; elsewhere, the national DMT association. Non-DMT psychotherapists can use KMP concepts, such as noticing rhythm and attuning, as a lens in their own modality. They should not present a self-made profile as a KMP assessment [synthesis].

2. Framework

The KMP is a framework for assessment and intervention planning, not a phased treatment. Its "phases" are (a) the developmental sequence it maps and (b) the sequence of a clinical assessment–intervention cycle.

A. Structure of the profile (what is observed) [source: KMP site; Routledge TOC; Koch 2011; Wikipedia]

There are two developmental lines:

System I, tension-flow → effort line (movement dynamics, the "how"): tension-flow rhythms (need satisfaction), tension-flow attributes (temperament, affect), precursors of effort or "pre-efforts" (learning style, defence mechanisms) and efforts (coping with external reality).
System II, shape-flow → shaping line (relational structure, the "where to/from"): bipolar shape-flow (body image, whole-body growing and shrinking), unipolar shape-flow (local reactions to particular stimuli), shape-flow design, shaping in directions (self-protection, structuring of learning) and shaping in planes (social skills, three-dimensional relating).

The 2018 book has nine chapters, one per category. Wikipedia describes "eight frequency diagrams"; the difference is probably that shape-flow design is recorded differently [uncertain].

Developmental ordering, as Koch (2011) tabulates it:

Year 1, horizontal plane: attributes flow adjustment / even flow; bipolar shape-flow widening / narrowing; directional shaping lateral / medial (crossing the midline).
Year 2, vertical plane: low / high intensity; lengthening / shortening; up / down.
Year 3, sagittal plane: graduality / abruptness; bulging / hollowing; forward / backward.

Koch reports ten tension-flow rhythms that develop over the first five years and persist into adult life. Each developmental phase has an "indulging" rhythm (discovery and satisfaction) and a "fighting" rhythm (moving on to the next phase). The sources name only some of them:

oral sucking and biting (year 1);
twisting and strain/release (year 2) [source: Koch 2011; Johnson 2018];
a later "phallic" rhythm with an abrupt upsurge of tension [source: Kestenberg & Borowitz 1990].

Use Chapter 1 of the 2018 book for the full list and definitions of the remaining rhythms [uncertain].

B. Clinical cycle (how it is used)

Referral and consent: consent covers filming, how the video is stored, who notates it and what feedback will be given [synthesis].
Recording: about 5–10 minutes of video of the person in natural or semi-structured activity [source: Koch 2011].
Notation: a trained notator writes tension-flow and shape-flow by kinaesthetic empathy, and the notations are rated into frequency and sequence data [source: Koch 2011].
Profile construction: frequency diagrams for each category [source: Wikipedia]. Derived ratios and formulas are not given in the sources [uncertain].
Interpretation: descriptive and interpretive levels, including developmental comparison, harmony and clash within the person, dyadic comparison, and links to Anna Freud's metapsychological profile [source: Wikipedia; Center page].
Intervention planning: aim at the next developmental step and at the clashes found [source: Koch 2011; Center page].
Intervention: attunement, adjustment, and developmentally targeted movement, play, music and art, individually, with parent and child, or in groups [source: Center page; Koch 2011].
Review: re-observe or re-profile after a block of work [synthesis].

Format and session count. The sources give no fixed session count or length [uncertain]. The Center for Parents and Children ran 10–15 families at a time, with parent–child groups, individual family work and weekly parent journals [source: Center page]. Individual and group DMT formats are both described [source: Koch 2011].

Criteria for moving on. Profiles were used to judge whether a child showed regression or readiness for progression [source: Center page]. In practice [synthesis]:

Move from attunement-led work to introducing a new quality once the client tolerates being matched and initiates rhythmically.
Move to the next developmental pattern once the current one appears spontaneously and flexibly, not only on prompting.
End or re-profile when the repertoire has visibly widened and the presenting problem has eased.

3. Guiding principles

Movement is meaningful and patterned developmentally: Read a quality first as a stage-linked need or affect, not as random behaviour [source: KMP site; Koch 2011].
Describe before you interpret: Record frequencies and sequences first, and keep any hypothesis separate from what you observed [source: Wikipedia].
Observe through kinaesthetic empathy: Let the other person's tension changes register in your own body (when notating, through the writing hand) [source: Koch 2011; Center page].
Attune in tension-flow: Match rhythm and intensity to build empathy and communication; you do not need to copy the exact shape or body part [source: Center page; Lauffenburger 2003 citing Kestenberg].
Adjust in shape-flow: Grow and shrink with the person so they feel held and safe. Shape-flow adjustment supports trust and the alliance rather than affect [source: Lauffenburger 2003].
Some clashing is healthy: Aim for a predominance of attunement, not total attunement. Occasional clashing is normal, so do not chase perfect synchrony [source: Lauffenburger 2003 citing Kestenberg].
Meet them where they are, then lead: To soothe, first match the current tension, then gradually move toward calmer, less intense patterns [source: Center page].
Indulging and fighting are both needed: Fighting rhythms are not "aggression". In Koch's account, aggression in the everyday sense needs at least two fighting rhythms combined, so do not pathologise sharp movement [source: Koch 2011].
Aim at the next developmental step: Choose activities that invite the next quality in the sequence, not adult norms [source: Koch 2011; Center page].
A balanced, broad repertoire is the working norm for health: Treat a narrow repertoire as a target for expansion. This is a theoretical assumption of the KMP, not an established fact [source: Wikipedia].
Read culture before meaning: Check movement metaphors and norms against the client's culture before interpreting. For example, making oneself small does not carry the same meaning in every language [source: Wikipedia citing Kestenberg Amighi 2008].
Prevention through the parent–child dyad: With young children, work through the parent, increasing empathy and removing obstacles to development [source: Center page].
The profile is a lens, not a diagnosis: Present findings as hypotheses about movement preferences. Never present them as proof of a disorder or of abuse [synthesis; see section 5].

4. Intervention inventory

The inventory has two parts. Part A covers the assessment procedures: recording, notating, building the profile and interpreting it. Part B covers the clinical interventions that KMP authors describe. Example language is illustrative. Detailed rating rules, diagram formulas and the full category definitions are in the 2018 book and in certified training. They are not reproduced here, and the parts not drawn on are marked [uncertain].

A1. Consent and video recording for a profile

Purpose / when: to get the raw material for a KMP. This is a 5–10 minute video of the target person, used whenever a formal profile is wanted [source: Koch 2011].
Steps:
1. Explain the purpose, who will watch the recording, how long it is kept and that the person may stop filming at any time. With children, get parental consent and the child's assent [synthesis].
2. Film in a space the person knows, with enough floor clear of furniture and hard edges. Children should be in free play; adults can be in conversation, free movement or a set task. Keep the whole body in the frame [synthesis].
3. Record 5–10 minutes of usable footage. For dyadic work, film the parent and child together [source: Koch 2011; Center page].
4. Store the video encrypted under your service's data policy and delete it when the agreed time runs out [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "I'd like to film about ten minutes of you and Sam playing so I can study the movement rhythms afterwards. Only I and my supervisor will watch it, and you can ask me to stop at any point."
Watch for: self-conscious, "performed" movement in the first minutes. Film longer and use the later footage. A child who refuses the camera has declined assent: respect it [synthesis].

A2. Tension-flow writing (rhythm writing)

Purpose / when: to record changes in muscle tension (free flow and bound flow) over time. The rhythms and attributes are identified from this record [source: Koch 2011; Kestenberg & Borowitz 1990].
Steps:
1. Watch the video and take the mover's changes in tension into your own body, especially your writing hand. Koch calls this kinaesthetic empathy [source: Koch 2011].
2. Let your hand trace a continuous line on paper that rises and falls with the tension changes you feel. The exact baseline conventions for neutral, free and bound flow are taught in KMP training [uncertain].
3. Do the same for the body's growing and shrinking to produce a shape-flow line [source: Wikipedia; KMP site, inferred; uncertain on the procedure].
4. Rate the charts with the KMP rating procedure to get rhythm frequencies and sequences [source: Koch 2011].
Example language: none; the notator does this alone.
Watch for: fatigue and drift. Novice raters are unreliable, especially on unipolar shape-flow, while tension-flow rhythms and bipolar shape-flow are rated more reliably [source: Koch, Cruz & Goodill 2001]. Check your notation against a certified analyst's [synthesis].

A3. Building the frequency diagrams (the profile)

Purpose / when: to show how often each quality in each category is used, laid out by developmental sequence [source: Wikipedia; KMP site].
Steps:
1. Count the occurrences of each element in each category [source: Wikipedia].
2. Plot the counts on the diagrams, with System I (tension-flow → effort) on one side and System II (shape-flow → shaping) on the other, arranged so that earlier qualities sit before later ones [source: Wikipedia].
3. Compute any summary ratios the training specifies [uncertain].
Watch for: samples too short to give stable frequencies [synthesis].

A4. Interpreting the profile

Purpose / when: to form hypotheses about needs, temperament, defences, coping, body image and relating, for treatment planning [source: KMP site; Wikipedia].
Steps:
1. Descriptive level first: state which qualities are frequent and which are absent [source: Wikipedia].
2. Developmental comparison: compare the profile with the developmental pattern typical for the person's age and subculture [source: Wikipedia].
3. Harmony and clash within the person: look for matching pairs across systems, for example a tension-flow attribute and its corresponding shape-flow element in the same plane, and for clashing pairs [source: Wikipedia; Koch 2011 tables; detailed matching rules uncertain].
4. Dyadic comparison: with two people, such as parent and child or therapist and client, look for where their profiles attune or clash [source: Wikipedia; Koch 2011; Center page].
5. Metapsychological link (optional, psychodynamic): relate the findings to Anna Freud's developmental or metapsychological profile [source: Wikipedia].
6. Body attitude: the 2018 book closes with reviewing the "body attitude" alongside the diagrams [source: Routledge TOC; content uncertain].
7. Write the findings as hypotheses about strengths and limits, followed by intervention targets [synthesis].
Watch for: reading meaning into culturally normal movement [source: Wikipedia]. Do not treat any single quality as diagnostic (see section 5).

A5. Prenatal notation by parents

Purpose / when: in pregnancy, to help parents attune to the fetus [source: Kestenberg & Borowitz 1990; KMP site pregnancy videos].
Steps:
1. Teach the pregnant woman to notice and note the fetal movements she feels and sees, including changes in shape and position [source: Kestenberg & Borowitz 1990].
2. The KMP site's pregnancy materials cover attuning to fetal movement, notating it, "supporting and creating space for the baby" and supporting the mother in labour. Their procedures are not drawn on [uncertain].
Watch for: do not imply that fetal movement shows the baby's personality or that it can be diagnosed. Kestenberg & Borowitz posed fetal pleasure and pain as open questions [source: Kestenberg & Borowitz 1990]. Work alongside midwifery and obstetric care; any touch on the abdomen needs the explicit consent described in B2 [synthesis].

A6. Feeding back profile findings

Purpose / when: to share the profile with the client, parents or the team in a way that supports the work [synthesis].
Steps (synthesis):
1. Start with strengths, the qualities the person has readily available.
2. Describe the patterns in plain movement terms, such as "lots of smooth, soothing rhythms; fewer sharp, decisive ones".
3. Offer interpretations as possibilities and ask whether they fit.
4. Agree one or two movement goals.
5. Never put a diagnostic label or allegation into writing on the basis of movement alone.
Example language (illustrative): "Your daughter moves a lot in the side-to-side, widening and narrowing patterns that usually come first. Forward-and-back movements, which go with deciding and moving towards things, show up less. We could play with those together."
Watch for: parents hearing the findings as blame for their parenting. Frame clashes as differences in style that can be bridged [synthesis; the clash concept is from Koch 2011 and Lauffenburger 2003].

B1. Tension-flow attunement (visual, without touch)

Purpose / when: to create movement empathy and a felt sense of being understood. This is the core relational intervention, useful with infants, nonverbal or minimally verbal clients (Koch names autistic children) and anyone for whom words are not the main channel [source: Center page; Koch 2011; Lauffenburger 2003].
Steps:
1. Watch the client's rhythm: how tension builds and releases, how strong it is (intensity) and how fast it changes (abrupt or gradual) [source: Center page; Kestenberg & Borowitz 1990].
2. Feel it in your own body through kinaesthetic identification [source: Center page].
3. Respond with the same rhythm and tension using any body part. You do not need to copy the shape: a vigorously kicking infant can be met by a hand moving with the same rhythm and force [source: Center page].
4. Keep matching continuously rather than echoing single gestures. Stern's attunement, which Lauffenburger links to the KMP, matches intensity, timing and shape across channels, and he stresses that plain imitation is not enough [source: Lauffenburger 2003 citing Stern].
5. Matching can cross channels, for example voice or drum to movement [source: Lauffenburger 2003, "intermodal" matching; application to voice/drum is synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): usually none. Afterwards you might say: "I was moving with your rhythm there. What was that like?"
Watch for:
- Signs it is working: the client looks, slows or speeds with you, starts initiating, or relaxes.
- Signs it is not: the client stiffens, turns away or says "stop copying me". Shift to a looser, cross-channel match or step back [synthesis].

B2. Touch attunement

Purpose / when: with infants (through parents) or clients who need contact to feel met. The attuner's hand rests on the mover and follows small changes in tension, which can be done with almost no visible movement [source: Center page].
Steps:
1. Consent first [synthesis]:
  - Explain what the touch is, where it will be (hand, forearm, upper back; never the chest, buttocks, genitals or inner thigh) and why.
  - Ask, and accept "no" without pressure.
  - Agree a clear stop signal, verbal and nonverbal (for example a raised hand).
  - With children, get parental consent and the child's assent each time. Where possible, coach the parent to do the touch attunement rather than doing it yourself.
2. Rest your hand lightly on the agreed area and feel the tension changes [source: Center page].
3. Let your hand follow the changes with matching small shifts of tension, without pushing or leading [source: Center page].
4. Check in verbally at intervals. Remove your hand at once on any stop signal or freeze response [synthesis].
5. Close by naming that the touch is ending, then removing your hand slowly [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Would it be OK if I rested my hand on your forearm to feel your rhythm with you? You can say no, or lift your hand any time and I'll stop straight away."
Watch for: freezing (bound flow that "freezes" movement) [source: Lauffenburger 2003], dissociation, startle, compliance without real agreement, and trauma or cultural meanings of touch, including gender and religious norms. Touch is never sexual. Note your consent process in the record. Offer visual attunement (B1) as an equal alternative [synthesis].

B3. Soothing: match, then lead down

Purpose / when: for an upset, agitated or dysregulated child or adult [source: Center page].
Steps:
1. Match the current level of tension and rhythm first, visually or by touch with consent [source: Center page].
2. Once you sense contact, shift gradually toward calmer, lower-intensity, more gradual patterns, and let the client follow [source: Center page].
3. Smooth, indulging rhythms such as sucking-like, rocking-type patterns are the natural direction for self-soothing [source: Koch 2011, which links self-soothing to the sucking rhythm; the clinical use is synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "That's a lot of energy, let's shake it out together… and a bit slower now… and slower."
Watch for: leading down too early, before matching, which feels dismissive and escalates. If the client does not follow, return to matching [synthesis].

B4. Shape-flow adjustment

Purpose / when: to build trust, comfort and safety by growing and shrinking in tune with the client's body shape. Use it in early alliance-building, with infants and with anxious or traumatised clients [source: Lauffenburger 2003; KMP site].
Steps:
1. Notice the client's breathing-linked growing and shrinking. Watch for widening or narrowing, lengthening or shortening, and bulging or hollowing [source: Koch 2011].
2. Adjust your own shape: widen as they widen, narrow or give space as they narrow [synthesis based on Lauffenburger 2003].
3. Use posture, distance and holding shape to make room. For example, give space when a client shrinks away from a stimulus, which is unipolar shrinking from something noxious [source: Kestenberg & Borowitz 1990; synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "I'll sit back a little, there's lots of room here."
Watch for: the client's breathing easing and their shape opening as signs of safety; growing toward you suggests attraction or comfort, shrinking suggests aversion [source: Koch 2011; Kestenberg & Borowitz 1990].

B5. Working with clashing

Purpose / when: when rhythms do not blend, between therapist and client or between parent and child [source: Lauffenburger 2003; Koch 2011].
Steps:
1. Notice the clash: the profile shows mismatched rhythms or attributes, for example one partner abrupt and high-intensity while the other is gradual and low [source: Koch 2011; Wikipedia].
2. Accept that some clashing is normal and needed; only predominant clashing is the target [source: Lauffenburger 2003 citing Kestenberg].
3. Find a bridge: one partner briefly attunes to the other, then they look for a shared rhythm [synthesis].
4. In dyads, coach the parent to recognise the child's rhythm and to attune before redirecting [source: Center page, "increase parent–child empathy"; coaching steps synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Notice how Mia's kicks are quick and sudden. Can you try tapping her feet with that same quick beat, then slow it down with her?"
Watch for: the parent experiencing coaching as criticism [synthesis].

B6. Mirroring, felt experience and verbalising meaning

Purpose / when: with clients who can reflect, individually or in groups, to link movement to feeling and meaning [source: Koch 2011].
Steps:
1. Mirror the client's movement, or ask group members to mirror each other [source: Koch 2011].
2. Ask about the felt experience in the body [source: Koch 2011].
3. Help put the associated meanings into words, such as needs, memories or relational patterns [source: Koch 2011].
Example language (illustrative): "When you did that twisting movement and I followed it, what did you notice? … Does that feeling remind you of anything?"
Watch for: mirroring that becomes mimicry. Stern, as cited by Lauffenburger, holds that imitation does not convey attunement [source: Lauffenburger 2003].

B7. Developmental step-up: inviting the next pattern

Purpose / when: the central treatment logic. Once you know where the person's repertoire stops, you work to move them to the next developmental step [source: Koch 2011; Center page, "remove obstacles to development"].
Steps:
1. From the profile, pick a quality that is under-used and comes next in the sequence. For example, after horizontal-plane patterns (widening and narrowing, lateral and medial), the next are vertical-plane patterns (lengthening and shortening, up and down) and then sagittal (forward and backward, bulging and hollowing) [source: Koch 2011 tables].
2. Attune to the current pattern first (B1) [synthesis].
3. Offer play that naturally calls for the next quality [synthesis]:
  - reaching up high and squatting low for the vertical plane;
  - advancing toward and retreating from a target for the sagittal plane, which Koch links to decision-making;
  - crossing the midline to reach for objects.
4. Repeat across sessions until the quality appears spontaneously [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Can you reach all the way up to the ceiling… and now curl right down small like a seed?"
Watch for: pushing too far ahead. Regression to earlier patterns under stress is expected; return to attunement and try again [source: Center page notes regression and readiness; the response is synthesis].

B8. Rhythm enactment (dynamic body feedback)

Purpose / when: with adults who can reflect, to explore how particular rhythms change affect, and to widen access to indulging (smooth) or fighting (sharp) qualities [source: Koch 2014 via Wikipedia; Johnson 2018].
Steps:
1. Demonstrate a rhythm and invite the client to move it for a short time. In research, adults enacted sucking, biting, twisting and strain/release rhythms and then reported how they felt [source: Johnson 2018].
2. Ask about the feeling state after each one [source: Johnson 2018].
3. Clinical use [synthesis]: if the client lacks assertion, practise sharp, fighting rhythms in a playful, contained way. If the client cannot settle, practise smooth, indulging rhythms. Process each with B6.
Example language (illustrative): "Let's try a sharp, snapping movement with your hands for a few seconds… now stop. What do you notice in your mood?"
Watch for: research found smooth rhythms linked to indulgent affects and sharp ones to assertive or aggressive affects in non-clinical adults [source: Johnson 2018; Koch 2014 via Wikipedia]. Do not assume the effect transfers to clinical populations. Stop if sharp rhythms trigger anger you cannot contain or trauma memories [synthesis].

B9. Parent–child dyadic work

Purpose / when: for prevention and early intervention in infancy and early childhood around sleep problems, weaning, separation, anxiety and other stressful transitions [source: Center page].
Steps:
1. Profile the parent and the child to identify vulnerabilities, compatibilities and incompatibilities, developmental level, and regression or readiness to progress [source: Center page].
2. Work with the individual family using movement, music or art aimed at the identified issue [source: Center page].
3. Teach the parent attunement: visual, touch and soothing (B1–B3) [source: Center page].
4. The aims are more parent–child empathy, fewer obstacles to development and more capacity to cope with stress [source: Center page].
Example language (illustrative): "Before you pick him up, try matching the rhythm of his crying with your swaying, then slow your sway."
Watch for: parental depression or stress. Nonverbal stress indices in parent–child dyads and maternal depression have been studied with the KMP [source: Wikipedia citing Birklein & Sossin 2006 and Reale 2011]. Refer the parent for their own care where needed [synthesis].

B10. Developmental movement groups

Purpose / when: groups of children, or parent–child groups [source: Center page].
Steps:
1. Let the group move freely and observe its scattered movement [source: Center page].
2. Turn it into a shared theme, then use dances, dramas, improvisations and games to meet the group's developmental needs [source: Center page].
3. Include art, music, fine and gross motor activities, free play, stories and a snack, matched to each child's level [source: Center page].
Example language (illustrative): "I see lots of you spinning — let's all be washing machines together… now slow-motion washing machines."
Watch for: collisions and over-arousal. See the space and safety notes in section 5.

B11. Art and music adjuncts (e.g. group clay pressing)

Purpose / when: to support movement goals and group cohesion [source: Center page].
Steps: use shared art tasks, such as children pressing clay together, which built a sense of community. Use music to carry rhythms [source: Center page]. Use non-toxic, age-appropriate materials and supervise small items with young children [synthesis].
Watch for: choking hazards and allergies (for example to some modelling doughs) [synthesis].

B12. Weekly parent journals

Purpose / when: to track progress between sessions in individual family work [source: Center page].
Steps: ask the parent to write a brief weekly note on the target issue and the movement or attunement practice, and review it at the next session [source: Center page; content of entries synthesis].
Watch for: the journal becoming a burden. Shorten it to a few lines [synthesis].

B13. Personalised preparation books

Purpose / when: before major family events such as hospitalisation, a new sibling or a parent's long absence [source: Center page].
Steps: staff wrote and illustrated a book about the coming event for the individual child [source: Center page]. Keep it concrete, in the child's own words where possible, and read it with the parent [synthesis].
Watch for: facts the family has not agreed to share; agree content with the parents [synthesis].

5. Handling problems

The sources say little about clinical difficulties. Unless tagged otherwise, the guidance below is [synthesis].

Validity limits: the profile is never evidence of abuse or disorder.

What is known about reliability is thin. In a pilot (5 student raters, 4 adults, 3 of 9 dimensions, 45 hours of training), reliability was "rather inconsistent". Raters struggled most with unipolar shape-flow and did better on tension-flow rhythms and bipolar shape-flow [source: Koch, Cruz & Goodill 2001]. No reliability coefficients for certified analysts are given in the sources [uncertain].
Validity evidence is partial. It mostly comes from non-clinical adults: links between rhythms and affect [source: Johnson 2018; Koch 2014 via Wikipedia] and use as a theoretical lens for adult conflict behaviour [source: Koch 2007 via Wikipedia]. Movement-observation systems "need to be critically examined" [source: Koch 2011].
Interpretation is culturally bound. The KMP assumes a broad, balanced repertoire means health, and the meaning of a movement differs across cultures [source: Wikipedia].
In practice:
- Never state, imply or write that a rhythm (for example strain/release or genital-phase rhythms), a shape pattern or shrinking from touch shows sexual abuse, trauma or a specific disorder.
- Movement findings may raise a concern to explore. They are not evidence.
- Safeguarding decisions rest on disclosure, observed harm and the usual assessment, never on a profile.
- In court or child-protection reports, describe the KMP as a clinical observation tool with limited published reliability and no diagnostic validation [synthesis].

Touch: consent and opt-out.

Use the full steps in B2: explain, ask, agree a stop signal, renew consent every session, and keep visual attunement as an equal option.
Touch only neutral areas, and never sexual or genital touch.
With trauma survivors, start without touch. Introduce it only at the client's request and after discussion.
Account for cultural and religious norms on touch between genders.
With children, prefer coaching the parent to touch rather than touching yourself. Keep the door open or another adult present according to service policy.
Record consent [synthesis].

Space, falls and physical safety.

Clear the floor of furniture and trip hazards, pad or cover hard edges, and use a non-slip surface. Bare feet or grip socks are better than socks on wood.
Agree movement boundaries in groups: no running into others, "freeze" signals.
Lower the intensity for clients with balance, cardiac, joint or pregnancy-related limits, and check medical clearance where relevant.
Have a first-aid kit and trained person available.
With infants, practise safe-holding and never leave a baby unattended on raised surfaces [synthesis].

Children and young people. Get parental consent and the child's assent, including for filming. Follow local safeguarding and mandatory-reporting duties, store video securely, include parents as the Center model does, and adapt by working through play [synthesis; the parent involvement is from the Center page].

Stuck client: the repertoire does not widen.

Go back to attunement and check whether the step you offered was too far ahead.
Offer the same quality through a different channel, such as music, clay or story (B10–B11).
Re-profile to check the original reading.
Consider whether a clash between you and the client, in your own movement style, is part of it, and discuss this in supervision.

Resistance: "stop copying me", self-consciousness, refusal to move.

Switch from obvious mirroring to cross-channel or subtle attunement (B1), using hand rhythm or voice.
Allow seated or minimal movement, and treat the refusal as information about bound flow or shrinking.
Never insist.

Overwhelm and dissociation.

Signs: sudden freezing, a glazed look, high-intensity abrupt flow that escalates, shrinking away.
Response:
1. Stop the activity and lower the intensity.
2. Match, then lead down (B3).
3. Ground the client with their feet on the floor, orienting to the room and slow breath.
4. Give them space (B4).
5. Discuss it before continuing.
Avoid fighting-rhythm work (B8) with people prone to rage or trauma flashbacks until they can regulate.

Non-adherence: parents not practising or journals not done. Shorten tasks, practise attunement in the session with the parent and child together, and explore barriers such as depression, stress or feeling judged.

Ruptures. These may follow misattunement, a clash, unwanted touch, or feedback heard as blame. Name the rupture, take responsibility for your part, return to shape-flow adjustment to restore safety (B4), and invite the client to say what felt wrong.

Modality-specific difficulties.

Notator bias: your own movement preferences shape what you see. Use a second rater or a certified analyst [synthesis; the rater-reliability concern is from Koch, Cruz & Goodill 2001].
Over-interpretation of psychoanalytic stage labels ("oral", "anal" and so on) with clients: use plain descriptive language.
Video privacy: never show recordings in training without separate written consent.
Scope: use the KMP alongside medical, developmental and psychiatric assessment, not instead of them.

Sources

Sources:

Books and papers cited (further reading, not drawn on; details as given in the sources above):

Kestenberg Amighi, J., Loman, S. & Sossin, K. M. (eds.) (2018). The Meaning of Movement: Embodied Developmental, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives of the Kestenberg Movement Profile (2nd ed.). Routledge. Chapter text is not drawn on [uncertain].
Kestenberg Amighi, J., Loman, S., Lewis, P. & Sossin, K. M. (1999). The Meaning of Movement. Brunner-Routledge.
Koch, S. C. (2007). Defenses in movement: video-analysis of conflict patterns in group communication. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 2(1). Cited via Wikipedia.
Koch, S. C. (2014). Rhythm is it: effects of dynamic body feedback on affect and attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology 5. Cited via Wikipedia.
Birklein, S. & Sossin, K. M. (2006); Reale, A. E. (2011); Kestenberg Amighi, J. (2008). Cited via Wikipedia [uncertain].

Further reading (not drawn on): the KMP analyst certification requirements page and the full text of Fernandes (2009). The complete list of the ten tension-flow rhythms, the pre-effort and effort elements as the KMP defines them, and the profile ratios therefore remain [uncertain].

← Previous · VIII-090Laban-Bartenieff movement analysis Next · VIII-092 →Movement Psychodiagnostic Inventory