Relationship play therapy

1. Introduction

Version followed: Clark Moustakas's relationship play therapy as presented in Relationship Play Therapy (Jason Aronson, 1997) and in the two 1997 Center for Play Therapy (University of North Texas) teaching videos, Relationship Play Therapy (a live, unscripted session) and Reflections on Relationship Play Therapy (a 56-minute discussion directed by Garry Landreth). Earlier Moustakas works shape the approach: Children in Play Therapy (McGraw-Hill, 1953; Jason Aronson printing, 1973), Psychotherapy with Children: The Living Relationship (1959), Who Will Listen? Children and Parents in Play Therapy (1975), and his 1955 research paper on negative attitudes in play therapy. Source status: Moustakas's books are cited through publisher descriptions, library catalogue records and secondary accounts, not from their text [uncertain]. Confirmed from those records: the publisher description, the video topics, his bibliography with journal details, and the existence and name of his 1955 "Levels of Emotional Process". The five-level wording in section 2 comes from a university training module, not from Moustakas's own text. His parent procedures are not described in these sources [uncertain]. The guidance below says plainly where it rests on these descriptions and where it is synthesis. [source: Torrossa publisher page; CPT product page; SCU library record; Wikipedia bibliography; HathiTrust record; UCT thesis record (Breen 1989); TAMUCC training module; Frick-Helms reference list]

What it is. Relationship play therapy is a humanistic, relationship-centred way of doing play therapy with children. It grew out of the relationship-therapy line of Otto Rank as adapted by Jessie Taft and Frederick Allen, and it sits close to Rogerian and Axline-style non-directive play therapy. Moustakas used it with two groups. The first is children who suddenly become troubled at home or school, who can work through anger and fear in a few sessions. The second is seriously disturbed children, who need longer work towards emotional maturity, respect for others and faith in themselves. [source: Torrossa publisher description; Wiley catalogue sample chapter "Definition and History of Play Therapy"; Chauhan et al. 2024]

How change happens. The relationship itself is the treatment. A therapist who is genuinely present, patient and accepting, and who keeps honest limits (including personal ones), gives the child a safe base. From there the child can express negative feelings fully. As those feelings are expressed and accepted, they lose intensity and become more differentiated. More positive feelings, a stronger sense of self and will, and more balanced relationships then follow. The relationship-therapy tradition also stresses individuation: the child uses the therapist as a secure base to try out being a separate self in relation to another person. [source: BAPT History of Play Therapy; Wiley sample chapter; Chauhan et al. 2024 on genuineness; CPT/SCU video topic lists]

Relation to other entries. The playroom, toy selection, tracking, reflecting feelings and the limit-setting model of child-centred play therapy are covered in 157 Child-centred play therapy, and the UK non-directive and integrative model in 158 Non-directive and integrative play therapy (BAPT). This guide does not repeat them. It covers what is distinctive in Moustakas: the therapist's use of self and genuineness, personal limits, emotional contact, patience, activating the child's will, and the emotional-process view of therapy. [synthesis]

Professional frame. This is a method for trained clinicians, not a standalone qualification. In the US, the Association for Play Therapy (APT) awards the Registered Play Therapist (RPT) credential on top of a mental-health licence. In the UK, play therapy is not an HCPC-protected title. Practitioners train through programmes recognised by the British Association of Play Therapists (BAPT) or Play Therapy UK (PTUK), and work as, or alongside, registered counsellors, psychotherapists, psychologists or social workers. Check each body's current requirements yourself. [uncertain] Do not use this approach with children without supervised play-therapy training and child-protection training. [synthesis]

2. Framework

Moustakas describes a relationship and an emotional process, not a manualised sequence of sessions. No fixed protocol is published in the sources cited. The framework below combines his published process with standard clinical structure; each part is tagged.

Emotional-process stages (Moustakas). BAPT gives a condensed three-part summary of his account of how feelings change over therapy. [source: BAPT History of Play Therapy]

Early: the child's feelings are generally negative, often diffuse and pervasive.
Middle: negative feelings are expressed in play and towards the therapist. As they are accepted, they become less intense and more specific.
Later: more positive feelings appear alongside the negative ones, and the child relates in a more balanced way.

The five levels in fuller form. Later writers call Moustakas's scheme his "Levels of Emotional Process". It comes from his 1955 paper, "The frequency and intensity of negative attitudes expressed in play therapy…", reprinted in 1982 as "Emotional adjustment and the play therapy process". Wikipedia gives the paper as volume 86, pages 79–99, but names the journal inconsistently, as both the Journal of General Psychology and the Journal of Genetic Psychology. Breen (1989) used these levels to track one child's progress through therapy. [source: Wikipedia bibliography; UCT thesis record] A Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi play-therapy training module gives the five-stage sequence usually taught from this work. The module does not name Moustakas and cites Landreth (2002). [source: TAMUCC module]

Negative feelings are diffuse and show up all through the child's play.
Ambivalent feelings dominate, usually anxiety or hostility.
Negative feelings are aimed directly at parents, siblings or the therapist; regressive behaviour may appear.
Ambivalence returns, now mixed positive and negative, aimed at family, the therapist and others.
Positive feelings dominate, and realistic negative feelings are expressed without ambivalence.

The following are [uncertain]: whether this list matches Moustakas's own 1955 wording; the paper's findings on how well-adjusted and disturbed children differ (its title points to the frequency and intensity of negative attitudes); and any number of sessions per level. Use the levels to track progress in session notes, not as fixed phases or a scoring scale. [synthesis]

Clinical phases [synthesis, built around the process above]:

Intake and agreement (1–2 meetings, parents or carers, child briefly). Goals: history, safeguarding screen, consent and child assent, agreeing parent involvement, and explaining to carers that early sessions may bring more anger before improvement. Move on when consent is in place and the referral question is clear.
Making contact (roughly sessions 1–4). Goals: the child experiences the therapist as present, patient and non-intrusive. The child explores; first limits are met. Move on when the child uses the room freely and comes in without major distress.
Expression and working through (variable). For a suddenly troubled child this may be a few sessions; for a seriously disturbed child it may be many months, per the publisher description. Goals: full expression of anger, fear and hostility within limits, including towards the therapist; the therapist stays in genuine contact. Move on when feeling intensity drops, play becomes more varied and constructive, and the child shows will and self-direction.
Consolidation (several sessions). Goals: positive and realistic feelings, mutual respect in the relationship, and transfer to home and school (reported by carers and teachers).
Ending (2–4 sessions announced in advance). Goals: a planned separation that the child can feel and talk about. Separation and individuation are central to the relationship-therapy tradition [source: Wiley sample chapter on individuation]; the ending procedure itself is [synthesis].

Format. Individual sessions in a playroom, usually weekly. Typical session length (often 45–50 minutes in play-therapy practice) is [synthesis]; Moustakas's own session length is not given in the sources cited. Parent work runs in parallel. Moustakas wrote on client-centred therapy with parents (Moustakas & Makowsky, 1952), and his 1959 work describes play sessions conducted by parents in the child's home, a forerunner of filial therapy. [source: Wikipedia bibliography; Wiley sample chapter]

3. Guiding principles

Each principle is listed with its practical meaning. Principles taken from the 1997 video topic lists and publisher text are tagged; the one-line meanings are [synthesis].

The relationship is the therapy [source: SCU/CPT video topics]. Judge each session by the quality of contact, not by what the child produced.
Genuineness [source: Chauhan et al. 2024]. Be a real person in the room: honest about your reactions, not a neutral mirror. Do not perform warmth you do not feel.
Making emotional contact [source: SCU/CPT]. Look for moments of real meeting (shared feeling, eye contact, a shared joke or fear) and stay with them rather than moving on.
Follow the child's lead [source: SCU/CPT]. The child chooses activities, pace and whether you join in. You join on invitation and on the child's terms.
Patience [source: SCU/CPT]. Allow silence, repetition and slow sessions. Do not rescue the child from struggle or boredom.
Activate or encourage the child's will [source: SCU/CPT]. Support the child's own choices, preferences and refusals as signs of an emerging self. Do not substitute your own plans.
The therapist's personal limits [source: SCU/CPT]. Besides the safety rules, name your own honest limits ("I don't want to be hit") as a real person in the relationship.
Limits are part of the relationship [source: CPT, SCU]. Limits are set clearly and kept. They give the relationship its reality and safety rather than being punishments.
Use of self in play [source: CPT]. When invited, take part in the child's play with real feeling, while staying aware of your therapeutic role.
Accept aggression and fear as expressible [source: CPT on responding to aggression; Torrossa on anger and fear]. Let the child express hostility symbolically and verbally. Stop acts that harm people or the room.
Find the best in children [source: SCU/CPT]. Keep looking for and naming strengths, care and competence, especially in children others see as "bad".
Faith in the child [source: Torrossa]. Hold, and convey, confidence that the child can grow towards maturity, respect for others and faith in themselves.
Safe base for individuation [source: Wiley sample chapter, relationship-therapy tradition]. Be steady enough that the child can move away, oppose you and come back.
No interpretation-led work [synthesis, consistent with the humanistic lineage]. Respond to feelings in the present rather than offering psychodynamic interpretations of play symbolism.
Play is not diagnostic evidence [synthesis]. Never treat a child's play themes as proof of abuse or disorder. Record what you observe and follow safeguarding procedure on disclosures and concerns.

4. Intervention inventory

Moustakas's sources present ways of being with a child rather than named techniques. Items 4.1–4.11 are the relational practices shown and discussed in the 1997 videos and the publisher material [source: CPT product page; SCU record; Torrossa]. Items 4.12–4.16 cover client groups, parent work and ending. Items 4.17–4.20 are the child-work safety frame. Step-by-step instructions are [synthesis] unless tagged otherwise; no Moustakas wording is quoted. For room set-up, toys, tracking, reflection and the ACT limit-setting model, see 157 Child-centred play therapy.

4.1 Making emotional contact

Purpose / when: to establish a felt, mutual connection, the basis of the relationship [source: SCU/CPT topic "making emotional contact"]. Use in every session, especially the first ones and after a rupture.
Steps: (1) Meet the child at the waiting area at the child's eye level and greet them by name. (2) In the room, give a brief open statement that the time is theirs, then settle physically (sit at the child's level, unhurried). (3) Watch for the child's feeling state through face, body and play intensity. (4) When a feeling is visible, respond briefly and warmly to that feeling, not to the activity. (5) If the child meets your eyes or shares a reaction, stay with it for a moment rather than adding words.
Example language (illustrative): "You came in fast today. Something's got you all stirred up." "That made you laugh. Me too."
Watch for: the child checking whether you are really there (looking at you after an act, showing you things). Contact is working when the child begins to direct feeling at you, positive or negative, rather than playing as if alone.

4.2 Following the child's lead

Purpose / when: to let the child's direction drive the session, which supports self-direction and will [source: SCU/CPT topic "following the child's lead"]. Use throughout.
Steps: (1) Do not suggest activities. If asked what to do, hand the choice back. (2) Let the child set the pace, including stopping or switching often. (3) If the child assigns you a role, take it as directed. Ask for directions when unsure ("What do I do now?"). (4) Do not correct how the child uses toys unless a limit is involved.
Example language (illustrative): "In here you can decide." "You want me to be the baby. What does the baby do?"
Watch for: your own urge to teach, tidy or improve the game. It is working when the child moves from asking permission to making confident choices.

4.3 Patient presence

Purpose / when: to give the child time to arrive at their own feelings and choices [source: SCU/CPT topic "the role of patience"]. Use with withdrawn, cautious or slow-to-warm children, and in repetitive phases.
Steps: (1) Tolerate silence; do not fill it with questions. (2) Accept the same play repeated over many sessions as meaningful work. (3) Keep your own pace slow: few words, steady tone. (4) If the child does nothing, stay attentive and available rather than prompting.
Example language (illustrative): "We have lots of time. You can just be here." (Then silence.)
Watch for: your own impatience (pressure from carers, schools or the referral). It is working when a withheld child begins small initiatives without being asked.

4.4 Genuine response (therapist as a real person)

Purpose / when: to offer an authentic relationship, not a technique [source: Chauhan et al. 2024 on genuineness; CPT "use of self"]. Use when the child asks about you, provokes you or invites a real reaction.
Steps: (1) Notice your actual reaction (pleasure, irritation, worry, surprise). (2) Decide whether sharing it serves the child. (3) If so, say it briefly in first person, owned as yours, without blame. (4) Return attention to the child's experience.
Example language (illustrative): "I felt a bit sad when you said goodbye to the doll like that." "I'm not sure I want to play that one. Tell me more about it."
Watch for: self-disclosure that burdens the child, turns attention to you, or reveals personal life details. It is working when the child treats you as a person they can affect and can trust to be honest.

4.5 Joining the play (use of self in play)

Purpose / when: to take part in the child's play as a genuine participant when invited [source: CPT topic "the therapist's use of self while joining the child's play"]. Use when the child gives you a role or asks you to play.
Steps: (1) Join only on the child's invitation. (2) Play with real but measured energy, at the child's level of intensity or slightly below. (3) Let the child win, lose or change rules as they choose, unless a limit is involved. (4) Step out of role briefly if the play becomes unsafe, frightening or sexualised, then decide with the child whether to go on.
Example language (illustrative): "Okay, I'm the monster. How scary should I be?" "I'm going to stop being the monster for a minute. That looked like it got really scary."
Watch for: taking over the story, competing for real, or playing out your own themes. It is working when the child directs and changes the play freely, with you as a responsive partner.

4.6 Setting limits as part of the relationship

Purpose / when: to keep the child, therapist and room safe and to make the relationship real [source: CPT/SCU topic "setting limits in play therapy"]. Use when an act would harm people or property, break time boundaries or seriously damage the room.
Steps: (1) Set limits only when needed, not as a list at the start (apart from essential time and safety framing). (2) Acknowledge the wish or feeling. (3) State the limit plainly and calmly. (4) Offer an acceptable alternative outlet. (5) If the limit is broken repeatedly, state the consequence (for example, the item is put away for today) and follow through without anger. Detailed limit-setting sequences are in 157 Child-centred play therapy.
Example language (illustrative): "You'd really like to throw the truck at the window. The window's not for throwing at. You can throw the soft ball at the wall."
Watch for: limits given in a punitive tone, or so many limits that the room stops feeling free. It is working when the child tests a limit, finds it holds, and then expresses the same feeling within it.

4.7 Stating personal limits

Purpose / when: Moustakas explicitly shows the therapist naming their own limits, not only general rules [source: CPT topic "setting therapeutic limits, including the therapist stating their own personal limits"; SCU "the therapist's personal limits"]. Use when something is technically allowed but you cannot genuinely tolerate it (being shouted at in the ear, sprayed with water, ordered into a degrading role).
Steps: (1) Notice your limit before you act out irritation. (2) Say it in first person, as yours. (3) Acknowledge the child's wish. (4) Offer what you can do instead. (5) Hold the limit consistently over sessions.
Example language (illustrative): "I don't want water on me. You can squirt it into the sink." "I'm not willing to lie on the floor for that. I can be the guard from my chair."
Watch for: personal limits being used to avoid the child's anger, or shifting from session to session. It is working when the child experiences you as both accepting and a separate person with edges.

4.8 Responding to aggression

Purpose / when: to allow the expression of anger and hostility while preventing harm [source: CPT topic "responding to aggressive behavior"; Torrossa on working through anger and fear]. Use when the child attacks toys, the room or the therapist.
Steps: (1) Stay physically calm; reduce your voice and movement. (2) Name the anger directly and accept it as a feeling. (3) If the target is a person (you), stop the act at once and redirect it to a symbolic target (punch bag, clay, drawing, dolls). (4) Allow the intensity of symbolic aggression while watching for escalation into loss of control. (5) After the peak, stay near and available; do not lecture.
Example language (illustrative): "You're so angry you want to smash everything. You can smash the clay as hard as you like." "I won't let you hit me. You can show me how mad you are on the bop bag."
Watch for: fear in you that leaks out as control, or excitement that escalates the child. It is working when aggressive episodes become more focused, shorter and followed by calmer or caring play.

4.9 Activating the child's will

Purpose / when: to strengthen the child's capacity to want, choose and oppose, which is central to growth in this approach [source: SCU "activating the child's will"; CPT "encouraging the child's will"]. Use with compliant, passive, over-controlled or anxious children, and in later phases.
Steps: (1) Notice small preferences and refusals. (2) Respond to them as legitimate ("You don't want to."). (3) Give real choices wherever limits allow. (4) Accept the child's opposition to you, within limits, as healthy. (5) Do not praise compliance; acknowledge decisions.
Example language (illustrative): "You've decided. You're in charge of that." "You don't want to clean up the sand today. You'd rather leave it how you made it."
Watch for: confusing will with defiance that hurts others (which still needs limits). It is working when the child states wants and "no" more clearly, in the room and, per carer report, at home.

4.10 Discovering and naming the best in the child

Purpose / when: to hold and convey faith in the child's potential [source: SCU "discovering the best in children"; Torrossa "faith in themselves"]. Use especially with children labelled difficult, and after aggressive episodes.
Steps: (1) Look actively for care, effort, creativity, humour and fairness in the play. (2) Name them specifically and briefly, as observations rather than evaluative praise. (3) Share positive observations with carers in parent sessions (with the child's knowledge). (4) Hold this view in your notes and in professional meetings as well.
Example language (illustrative): "You made sure the little one was safe before the storm came." "You worked a long time on that and didn't give up."
Watch for: reassurance that denies the child's real anger or distress. It is working when the child begins to describe themselves in more positive or mixed terms.

4.11 Staying with negative feelings (emotional-process work)

Purpose / when: to let diffuse negative feelings be fully expressed so that they can lose intensity and become specific, which in Moustakas's account precedes positive feeling [source: BAPT History of Play Therapy]. Use in the expression phase.
Steps: (1) Expect early sessions to show more anger, fear or hostility, and prepare carers for this. (2) Reflect the feeling without trying to soften it or move the child to a happier theme. (3) Allow feelings towards family members and towards you to be voiced in play and words. (4) Use the five levels in section 2 to track how the quality of feeling changes across sessions. Feelings move from diffuse to ambivalent, then to negative feelings aimed at particular people, then to mixed feelings, and finally to mostly positive feelings with realistic negatives. [source for the levels: TAMUCC module; how closely they match Moustakas's 1955 wording is uncertain] (5) Note mixed and positive feelings when they come, without rushing them.
Example language (illustrative): "You hate everything about it today." "You're cross with the daddy doll and you also want him to stay."
Watch for: expression that floods the child rather than relieves them (see section 5). It is working when you can track this change in session notes and carers report less pervasive distress.

4.12 Brief work with a suddenly troubled child

Purpose / when: Moustakas describes children who suddenly become troubled at school or at home and can work through anger and fear in a few sessions [source: Torrossa]. Use for recent, reactive difficulties in a child who functioned well before (for example, after a move, a new sibling or a separation).
Steps [synthesis]: (1) At intake, agree a short initial contract (for example, 4–8 sessions) with a review. (2) Keep the relational stance unchanged; do not become directive to save time. (3) Meet carers at the start and the review. (4) End once the feeling intensity has eased and functioning returns, or extend if the picture is more entrenched than it appeared.
Example language (illustrative, to a carer): "Sometimes a few sessions are enough when a child is reacting to something recent. We'll check at session six."
Watch for: a "sudden" change that is actually a response to harm or risk; screen for safeguarding before treating it as reactive.

4.13 Longer-term work with a seriously disturbed child

Purpose / when: for children who must work towards emotional maturity, respect for others and faith in themselves [source: Torrossa]. Use with long-standing, pervasive difficulties.
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Set an open-ended contract with regular reviews (for example, every 10–12 sessions). (2) Coordinate with the wider team (school, social care, psychiatry where involved). Play therapy is one part of care, not a replacement for medical, social or educational support. (3) Expect long phases of testing limits and repetition. (4) Keep consistency of room, time and therapist as a priority.
Watch for: drift without review, and risk issues that need other services. It is working when the child shows growing self-regulation, respect for limits and some mutual relating.

4.14 Working with parents and carers

Purpose / when: to support carers and extend the relational attitudes into the child's home. Moustakas co-wrote "Client-centered therapy with parents" (Moustakas & Makowsky, 1952, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 338–342). He also wrote on children and parents in play therapy in Who Will Listen? (1975). [source: Wikipedia bibliography] The sources cited do not describe either text's procedures, so his parent procedures are [uncertain], and the steps below are general practice. Use from intake throughout.
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Hold separate parent sessions (for example, every 3–6 child sessions). (2) Listen to the carer's own feelings with the same acceptance you give the child. (3) Share themes and progress, not the details of what the child said or played, unless safety requires it. Agree this confidentiality rule with child and carer at the start. (4) Help carers try genuine listening and clear limits at home. (5) Review consent and goals.
Example language (illustrative): "It sounds exhausting to be on the receiving end of so much anger at home." "I won't tell you what she says in the room, but I will tell you how things are going and anything you need to know to keep her safe."
Watch for: carers using sessions to obtain information about the child, or feeling blamed. It is working when carers report feeling more able to stay calm and listen.

4.15 Parent-conducted play sessions at home

Purpose / when: Moustakas (1959, Psychotherapy with Children) described play sessions conducted by parents in the child's home, a forerunner of filial therapy. [source: Wiley sample chapter] His procedure itself is not described in the sources cited [uncertain]. Use only with carers who are emotionally available and not a source of risk to the child.
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Assess the carer's suitability and the safety of the home. (2) Teach the core attitudes (following the lead, accepting feelings, a few clear limits) with modelling and practice. (3) Agree a short, regular home play time with a small set of toys. (4) Supervise through regular review meetings. For a fully structured protocol, use filial therapy (Guerney; VanFleet) and its own training.
Watch for: carers using play time to teach or correct; children for whom home is unsafe.

4.16 Ending and separation

Purpose / when: separation and individuation are central in the relationship-therapy tradition [source: Wiley sample chapter]. A planned ending lets the child experience a separation that is felt and survived. The ending procedure is [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Agree the end with carers when the consolidation criteria (section 2) are met. (2) Tell the child 3–4 sessions ahead and count down each week. (3) Accept and reflect sadness, anger or indifference about ending. (4) Keep the final session ordinary, with a brief goodbye. (5) Offer carers a follow-up review.
Example language (illustrative): "We have three more times together. Then our play times will be finished." "You're angry that it's ending. That makes sense to me."
Watch for: a temporary return of earlier behaviour (common and usually brief).

4.17 Consent, assent and confidentiality

Purpose / when: a lawful, ethical basis for treatment. Use at intake and whenever the plan changes. [synthesis; legal details vary by jurisdiction]
Steps: (1) Identify who holds parental responsibility or legal authority to consent, and obtain written informed consent from them; check court orders and the position of separated parents. (2) Seek the child's assent in age-appropriate words: what the room is, what happens there, that they can say they don't want to come, and who you will talk to. (3) Explain the limits of confidentiality to the child and carers in words they understand: you will tell others if someone is being hurt or is in danger. (4) Where local law gives older children their own consent rights (for example, Gillick competence in England and Wales), assess and record capacity. (5) Get separate consent for recording, photographing artwork or sharing material.
Example language (illustrative, to child): "This is a playroom. You can play with almost anything here, in almost any way. What you do here stays between us. The only time I'd tell someone is if I was worried you or someone else was being hurt."

4.18 Safeguarding and mandatory reporting

Purpose / when: children in play therapy may disclose, or show signs of, abuse or neglect. Use throughout. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Know your local duty before you start. US states set mandatory-reporter statutes; the UK uses statutory safeguarding guidance and local procedures rather than universal mandatory reporting for most professions; other countries differ. Check the law where you practise. [uncertain: general outline, unverified] (2) Know your agency's safeguarding lead and referral route. (3) If a child discloses, listen calmly, do not question for details, do not promise secrecy, and tell the child what will happen next. (4) Record the child's exact words, the date and time, and what you observed, separating fact from opinion. (5) Report within the required timeframe; consult the safeguarding lead. (6) Do not inform a carer who may be the source of harm before taking advice. (7) Never use play themes, sand scenes or drawings as evidence that abuse happened; record them as observations only.
Example language (illustrative): "Thank you for telling me. You haven't done anything wrong. I need to tell someone whose job it is to help keep children safe."

4.19 Touch boundaries

Purpose / when: joining the play and responding to aggression can bring physical contact, and the relationship emphasis can draw children close. Use as standing policy. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Agree a touch policy with your service and explain it to carers at intake. (2) Let the child initiate any ordinary contact (a hand-hold, a high-five); never initiate touch for your own comfort. (3) Ask before any touch you might offer, and accept "no" at once. (4) Never allow or engage in sexual or genital touch, lap-sitting with close body contact, or wrestling. Redirect calmly, naming the limit. (5) Physical restraint only as a last resort to prevent immediate harm, per agency policy, then record and inform carers. (6) Allow for trauma histories and cultural norms around touch. (7) Record any significant touch and any sexualised behaviour, and discuss it in supervision and, where indicated, with the safeguarding lead.
Example language (illustrative): "You want a big hug. In here we can do a high-five, or you can hug the big teddy."

4.20 Play materials and room safety

Purpose / when: the room must allow free expression, including aggression, without injury. Use when setting up and before each session. [synthesis; room and toy lists are covered in 157 Child-centred play therapy]
Steps: (1) Remove sharp, breakable or heavy items; use toy weapons that cannot cause injury, and soft balls and bop bags for aggressive play. (2) Check for choking-size parts with younger children, and for loose cords and blind pulls. (3) Use non-toxic paints, clay and play-dough, and check for allergies (for example, latex, food-based materials). (4) Have water and sand play on washable floors with spill control; check sand cleanliness. (5) Keep a window or observation panel in the door where possible, and know the agency's lone-working rules. (6) Clean and inspect toys regularly and after any bodily fluid exposure.

5. Handling problems

The sources cited name the relevant themes: patience, personal limits, limits, responding to aggression, following the lead and making contact [source: CPT; SCU]. They give no troubleshooting protocol. The responses below apply those themes and are [synthesis] unless tagged.

Child will not separate from the carer or enter the room. Let the carer come in for the first part of one or two sessions, sitting quietly to one side. Then agree a step-wise withdrawal (carer sits by the door, then in the waiting room). Name the fear ("It's hard to come in with someone new"). Patience matters more than getting into the room on time. [synthesis, applying "patience"]
Withdrawn, silent or "stuck" child. Keep sessions unhurried and non-demanding (4.3). Respond to small signs (a glance, a touched toy). Do not escalate questions or suggestions. Review after about 6–8 sessions of no change: consider an assessment for language, developmental or trauma factors, and whether a more structured approach would serve the child better.
Escalating aggression. Move from symbolic acceptance to clear limits early (4.6–4.8). Shrink the space or remove items that fuel escalation. If the child repeatedly hurts you after limits and consequences, end the session early, calmly and without punishment, with a carer present, and plan next time with your supervisor. Review whether one-to-one work is safe and whether a second adult or a different room is needed.
Overwhelm or flooding (dysregulation, dissociation, panic, re-enactment that frightens the child). Pause the play, slow down, and use your voice to ground the child ("You're here in the playroom with me. You're safe."). Offer a calming, sensory or holding activity (water, sand, a blanket), and let the child lead back in. Afterwards, consider whether the child needs a trauma-specific treatment (for example, a trauma-focused approach with established protocols) instead of or alongside this work, and inform the carer about after-session care.
Child gets worse at first. Moustakas's emotional-process account expects early expression of intense negative feelings [source: BAPT]. Prepare carers at intake. If deterioration is marked, lasting, or involves risk (self-harm, harm to others, school exclusion), review the plan rather than waiting for the process. Carry out a standard risk assessment for any self-harm or suicidal talk and act on it under your service's procedures.
Carers stop bringing the child (non-adherence) or want quick results. Hold a parent session that listens to their frustration first (4.14). Share specific signs of progress (4.10). Agree a review date and realistic goals. For practical barriers, consider school-based sessions or a different time. If attendance remains erratic, a brief contract (4.12) with a clear ending may be kinder than an interrupted open-ended one.
Rupture after a limit or a genuine response. Expect the child to be angry after a firm limit; accept the anger without reversing the limit (4.6). If you reacted with irritation or said something hurtful, own it simply at the next opportunity ("I sounded cross with you earlier. I'm sorry about that."). Repair is part of the real relationship, in keeping with the genuineness emphasis [source: Chauhan et al. 2024 on genuineness; repair steps synthesis].
Over-use of personal limits or self-disclosure. If you find yourself setting many personal limits, or talking about yourself, take it to supervision. The likely reasons are fatigue, countertransference or a room that is too permissive. Adjust the room or structure, not the child.
Child asks personal questions or wants to be friends, visit you or take toys home. Respond warmly and honestly to the wish, and hold the boundary. Toys stay in the room; artwork stays or goes by an agreed rule; contact happens only in sessions.
Sexualised play or behaviour. Stay calm. Redirect and set a limit on any touching of you or of the child's own body in the room (4.19). Do not interpret, question or show shock. Record the behaviour factually and discuss it promptly with the safeguarding lead. Sexualised play is not in itself proof of abuse, but it requires safeguarding consultation (4.18).
Disclosure during play. Follow 4.18 at once. Keep the session's remaining time calm and ordinary where possible, and tell the child what will happen.
Conflict between separated carers over consent or information. Check who holds legal authority (4.17). Share information equally with those entitled to it unless a court order or safety concern prevents this, and record decisions.
Cultural mismatch. Ask carers about family norms for play, mess, aggression, touch and adult–child talk. Adapt toys (dolls and figures that reflect the child's family and culture) and explain the rationale for permissive play where it clashes with home norms. Agree what limits will apply.
The child refuses to end, or the carer wants to stop abruptly. Negotiate at least one or two goodbye sessions (4.16). If an abrupt ending is unavoidable, offer the child a short letter or message explaining that the play times have finished and that it is not their fault.
Working without the training. If you are not trained and supervised in play therapy, do not start; refer to a qualified play therapist, or arrange training and supervision first.

Sources

Online sources:

Books and papers cited (details from the catalogue records and reference lists above):

Moustakas, C. (1953). Children in Play Therapy. New York: McGraw-Hill. ix, 218 pp. [source: Texas A&M library catalogue] (Reprinted New York: Jason Aronson, 1973.)
Moustakas, C. (1959). Psychotherapy with Children: The Living Relationship. New York: Harper. 324 pp. [source: ECU library catalogue]
Moustakas, C. (1975). Who Will Listen? Children and Parents in Play Therapy. New York: Ballantine.
Moustakas, C. (1997). Relationship Play Therapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Moustakas, C., & Makowsky, C. (1952). Client-centered therapy with parents. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 338–342.
Moustakas, C., & Schalock, H. D. (1955). An analysis of therapist-child interaction in play therapy. Child Development, 26, 143–157.
Moustakas, C. (1955). The frequency and intensity of negative attitudes expressed in play therapy… 86, 79–99 (journal named inconsistently in the Wikipedia bibliography as the Journal of General or Genetic Psychology). Reprinted 1982 as "Emotional adjustment and the play therapy process".
Landreth, G. L. (2002). Play Therapy: The Art of the Relationship (2nd ed.). Cited by the TAMUCC module.
Center for Play Therapy (1997). Relationship Play Therapy and Reflections on Relationship Play Therapy (videos, Counseling and Therapy in Video series; director G. L. Landreth). Denton, TX.

← Previous · VIII-155Release therapy Next · VIII-157 →Child-centred play therapy (Axline, Landreth)