Expressive arts therapy and intermodal arts

1. Introduction

Version followed: the intermodal expressive arts therapy of Paolo J. Knill, Ellen G. Levine and Stephen K. Levine as taught through the European Graduate School (EGS) and its affiliated institutes (Principles and Practice of Expressive Arts Therapy, 2004/2005; Fuchs-Knill & Knill 2015; Kriz & Atkins 2012), with the German-language "intermediale" line (Knill 1979, 2005, 2010; Swiss Intermediale Therapie) noted where it differs. The person-centred expressive arts of Natalie Rogers is a separate lineage: see tab 180 Person-centred expressive arts; it is not duplicated here.

Basis of the phase names: "decentering", "aesthetic analysis" and "harvesting" and the description of decentering come from Kriz & Atkins 2012 (POIESIS, EGS Press), which also gives the one sourced limit on decentering (acute life breakdown, see 5). A course description from the Portland Institute (secondary) gives the same arc in plain terms: clarifying the life situation, stepping away into art-making, aesthetic analysis, and bridging back to current life concerns. The opening phases are named here after the published HKU protocol (check-in, warm-up); no published source cited gives other labels for them. Lösungskunst is co-authored by Knill and Herbert Eberhart (English: Solution Art, 2023). The detail of Knill's crystallization theory and the admission rules of the Swiss federal art-therapy diploma remain [uncertain].

What it is. Expressive arts therapy (EXA) is an intermodal arts therapy: one therapist works with several art forms (visual art, movement, sound and music, drama, poetic writing) within one treatment, rather than specialising in one, as art, music, drama or dance/movement therapists do. Its authors ground it in art-making itself ("theory indigenous to art") rather than in a borrowed psychological model, and in the philosophical idea of poiesis, the human capacity to shape a world and thereby shape oneself. [source: UBC Press page for Levine, Knill & Levine 2004; CREATE Institute history; S. K. Levine 2011]

Origins. Shaun McNiff created the Institute for Arts and Human Development at Lesley College (Cambridge, MA) in 1974, and the Expressive Therapies Graduate Program began in 1975, combining dance, theatre, psychodrama, music, poetry and visual art with psychotherapy [source: Lesley University Archives]. Paolo Knill (1932–2020) was professor of counselling psychologies and expressive arts therapies at Lesley from 1976 to 1995 and helped found its graduate expressive arts therapy programme; he founded the International School for Interdisciplinary Studies (ISIS) in Switzerland in 1984 and, with Ellen and Stephen Levine, the European Graduate School in Saas-Fee in 1994. Ellen and Stephen Levine, with Fran Harwood, founded ISIS Canada in 1991, now the CREATE Institute in Toronto. [source: Wikipedia, Paolo Knill; CREATE Institute history] In German-speaking countries Knill's work appears as intermediale art therapy or "Ausdruckstherapie" (Knill 1979, Ausdruckstherapie: Künstlerischer Ausdruck in Therapie und Erziehung als intermediale Methode), later as art-oriented and resource-oriented change work (Knill 2005, Kunstorientiertes Handeln in der Begleitung von Veränderungsprozessen; Knill & Eberhart 2010, Lösungskunst, translated as Solution Art, 2023, with "intermodal decentering" as its central method) [source: Wikipedia bibliography; Hachette UK page for Solution Art; German titles only]. German-language institutes teach the method under the registered name "Intermodal Decentering IDEC®" [source: Expressive Arts Institute Berlin seminar page]. In Switzerland "Intermediale Therapie" is presented as one specialist strand (Fachrichtung) of art therapy [source: Bischofberger 2016].

How change happens (core idea). People in difficulty live in a narrowed world in which they feel unable to act. Decentering takes them away from the problem-bound everyday frame into a playful, sensuous, shaped engagement with art; there, surprise and the unplanned micro-steps of making reconnect them with forgotten creative resources and widen their "range of play". Careful aesthetic analysis and harvesting then bring what was found back to the problem situation as resources and new possible meanings. [source: S. K. Levine 2011, citing Knill 2005; Kriz & Atkins 2012] Knill's crystallization theory is described as resting on a phenomenological premise about artistic therapy; the guide's gloss (meaning arises in the aesthetic material between therapist and client, the artwork acting as a "third" that can introduce difference) comes from Levine's remarks in Kriz & Atkins 2012 and a Wikipedia summary, not from Knill's own text [uncertain].

Professional frame.

IEATA (International Expressive Arts Therapy Association, founded 1994) issues two registrations, both professional registrations by a membership body, not government licences [source: IEATA REAT vs REACE; REAT standards]:
- REAT (Registered Expressive Arts Therapist): for work that is or includes psychotherapy. Requires a master's or doctorate (EXA or creative arts therapy; or a mental health master's plus EXA institute training; or an MFA plus EXA training that includes psychology), at least 25 hours in three of four EXA areas (individual process, group process, application to client needs, approaches to intermodal practice), 25-hour blocks in three of four general therapy areas (ethics, personality, psychopathology, development), at least 50 hours of arts training or practice, a supervised practicum (200–1,000 hours by category), 1,000 post-graduate supervised client hours, set supervision hours, narratives including a case study showing intermodal transfer, the REAT Code of Ethics, and expressive arts continuing education for renewal (from September 2024). Personal expressive arts therapy is recommended but not required since 2015.
- REACE (Registered Expressive Arts Consultant/Educator): for teaching, coaching, workshops, healthcare, hospice, peacebuilding and organisational work; IEATA states such work may be therapeutic but "is not psychotherapy".
Training routes: Lesley University (expressive therapies), EGS (MA/PhD in expressive arts), CREATE Institute Toronto (diploma, practicum, clinic), ISIS-affiliated institutes in Europe, Canada and the US [source: Lesley Archives; CREATE; Wikipedia]. Hong Kong uses registered expressive arts therapists or supervised trainees for protocolised programmes [source: HKU EXABI protocol].
Legal status: REAT is not a licence. In the US, practitioners usually practise psychotherapy under a state mental-health licence (e.g. counselling, social work, MFT) and hold REAT in addition; in the UK, "art therapist", "drama therapist" and "music therapist" are HCPC-protected titles that REAT alone does not confer [synthesis; licensure rules are not addressed by the IEATA pages cited]. Switzerland: art therapy has a federal higher professional examination (Höhere Fachprüfung, HFP) leading to a federally recognised diploma (Kunsttherapeut/in mit eidgenössischem Diplom, shortened "ED"), with five Fachrichtungen; a Swiss training directory names "Gestaltungs- und Maltherapie" as one of the five and lists Intermediale Therapie among art-therapy specialisms. Training institutes such as inArtes, Institut für Intermediale Kunsttherapie (Winterthur), advertise training to "Kunsttherapeutin - Intermediale Methode" with admission to the HFP via OdA ARTECURA, and the Schule für Gestaltung Bern und Biel lists a "Kunsttherapeut/in HFP Intermediale" course [source: ausbildung-weiterbildung.ch directory; berufsberatung.ch listing title]. The exact exam body (OdA ARTECURA, and any role of OdA KSKT), the admission requirements (modules, practice and supervision hours) and the full list of Fachrichtungen are [uncertain].
Use without training: a licensed psychotherapist may use simple arts activities within their own competence, but should not describe the work as expressive arts therapy, offer intermodal trauma work, or run arts-based groups as therapy without EXA training and supervision [synthesis, consistent with IEATA's REAT/REACE scope split].

Materials and movement safety across modalities [synthesis: none of the sources cited gives a safety protocol; the HKU protocol only states that facilitators are trained in "safety precautions"]:

Visual art: use materials labelled non-toxic for the age group; no solvents, aerosol fixatives or spray paint indoors; work clay wet and clean with damp cloths or a mop (no dry sweeping or sanding, which raises silica dust); keep pastel and charcoal dust down (no blowing off); count scissors, craft knives, wire, glass and staples in and out with clients at risk of self-harm; check for latex, food and fragrance allergies before using balloons, food items, scented materials.
Fire and heat: no open candles, incense or hot-glue guns with clients at risk or with children unsupervised; agree an alternative (battery candle) for ritual elements.
Sound and music: keep drumming and amplified music at moderate levels in small rooms, offer foam ear plugs, keep a quieter corner, avoid sudden loud sounds without warning (startle can trigger trauma responses); ask about songs or genres linked to traumatic memories, and about voice-related shame before inviting singing.
Movement: clear the floor, check footwear and slippery surfaces, warn about spinning and eyes-closed work (dizziness, falls), adapt for pregnancy, frailty, pain and mobility aids; seated alternatives always available.
Darkness, blindfolds, enclosure: announce in advance and make optional; Knill objected to unannounced darkness and to distressing experiences sprung on people, noting that some participants panic [source: Wolf 2011 interview with Knill].
Touch: no touch without explicit, revocable consent asked each time; prefer touch through materials or props; never sexual or genital touch; cultural and trauma-informed opt-outs.
Artwork and records: agree storage, photographing, display and disposal of artwork; photos and recordings are clinical records and need consent.

Assessment caution. EXA authors do not use artwork as a projective test; Knill describes the surface first and leaves meaning to the end [source: Wolf 2011]. Do not treat images, movement or play as evidence of abuse or diagnosis [synthesis, per standard practice].

Children and young people. Safeguarding and mandatory-reporting duties apply to disclosures in any medium; obtain consent from those with parental responsibility and the child's own assent; agree with carers what will be shared (generally themes, not the artwork's content); shorten tasks and favour play and movement [synthesis].

2. Framework

EXA is a theory of practice and training tradition, not a manualised protocol; sessions follow a recurring architecture rather than fixed contents [source: UBC Press page; Kriz & Atkins 2012].

Session architecture. The published sources give these phases [source: HKU EXABI protocol; Kriz & Atkins 2012; Wolf 2011]. The names "decentering", "aesthetic analysis" and "harvesting" come from Kriz & Atkins 2012; the opening and warm-up labels follow the HKU protocol. A secondary course description names the same arc: clarifying the life situation, stepping away into art-making, aesthetic analysis, bridging back [source: Portland Institute course page; secondary]:

Opening / check-in. Goal: hear the concern and what the client wants from this session ("clarifying the life situation"). Move on when there is a working focus or when talk is circling. [source: HKU EXABI protocol, check-in; Portland Institute course page, secondary]
Warm-up into the arts. Goal: sensory and bodily arrival, lowering the threshold, stepping away from the problem into art-making. Move on when the client is engaged with a material or movement. [source: HKU EXABI protocol, warm-up; Portland Institute course page ("stepping away"), secondary]
Decentering: core arts-making, often across two or more modalities. Goal: move from the presenting problem into "sensuous immersion in an art-making experience" (Atkins, in Kriz & Atkins 2012) and the shaping of a work. Move on when the work feels finished or "works". [source: Kriz & Atkins 2012]
Aesthetic analysis: careful, detailed questions that help the client describe and name what was made and how it was made. Goal: appreciate the work and the process; find resources. [source: Atkins in Kriz & Atkins 2012]
Harvesting: what the client discovered, and how this speaks to the concern brought in; the therapist helps "mine that experience for resources" (Atkins, in Kriz & Atkins 2012). Goal: bridge back to life. [source: Kriz & Atkins 2012]
Sharing and closure: in groups, witnessing; then ending and any between-session task.

Course length and format. No fixed number in the founders' published sources cited. One published protocol: 8 weekly 90-minute group sessions for 6–8 adults, each with check-in, warm-up, core arts-making, sharing and closure, themed across the course (communication, expression, flexibility, relationship, coping with uncertainty, confidence, creativity, resilience) [source: HKU EXABI protocol]. Individual work is typically weekly, 50–90 minutes [synthesis].

Moving between phases of treatment [synthesis]: early sessions build trust and tolerance for making (low-threshold tasks); middle sessions use longer decentering and intermodal sequences; ending sessions review the body of work made and harvest across it.

3. Guiding principles

Intermodality: arts are rooted in different sensory modalities united in the body; use several. Practical meaning: choose and shift modalities to fit the moment rather than staying in one. [source: S. K. Levine 2011; IEATA]
Polyaesthetics: every art form engages several senses and imagination modes (attributed to Roscher, via Knill). Practical meaning: a drawing can be heard as rhythm, a movement read as an image. [source: HKU EXABI protocol]
Decentering: move away from the problem into the alternative world of art-making. Practical meaning: do not ask clients to depict the problem; give a task with its own logic. [source: S. K. Levine 2011 citing Knill 2005; Kriz & Atkins 2012]
Low skill, high sensitivity: choose forms that need high sensory sensitivity but only adequate manual skill (collage needs an eye and scissors, not art school). Practical meaning: pick a challenge the client can cope with; therapists cultivate sensitivity to all modes rather than mastery of each. [source: Fuchs-Knill & Knill 2015; CREATE; Wolf 2011]
Aesthetic responsibility: the therapist is responsible to the art and shapes interventions so the work can succeed and people regain lost creative action; "not everything goes". Practical meaning: coach the work toward quality; frames can be offered but beauty cannot be forced. [source: S. K. Levine 2011 citing Knill 1999; Fuchs-Knill & Knill 2015]
Range of play: give clarity about the frame and the room for shaping within it. Practical meaning: every task has clear limits (material, time, rule) and open space inside them. [source: Fuchs-Knill & Knill 2015; S. K. Levine 2011]
Surprise and not-knowing: the new arrives unplanned; Knill described "giving up control in order to achieve mastery". Practical meaning: let the work find its own form rather than forcing a preconceived one. [source: S. K. Levine 2011]
Aesthetic response: the client's affective response to what they made shows the work has touched their reality. Practical meaning: ask about the effect of the work on the maker, after description. [source: S. K. Levine 2011]
Surface before meaning: describe what is there and how it was made before interpretation; the therapist gives first feedback; meaning comes last. Practical meaning: avoid "what does it mean?" and "how do you feel?" as first questions. [source: Wolf 2011]
No censorship of the work: what appears in the work is not censored; ethical limits apply to work whose concept involves harm. Practical meaning: accept the image; set limits on actions, not content. [source: Wolf 2011]
Resources over deficits: clients often have rich language for problems and poor language for strengths; enrich the language of resources. [source: Atkins citing Eberhart, in Kriz & Atkins 2012]
Presence and non-judgmental witnessing; appreciative curiosity. Practical meaning: stay curious about the client's world and work without evaluating the person. [source: Kriz & Atkins 2012; S. K. Levine 2011; Atkins & Eberhart 2014 publisher description]
Many possible meanings: problems often rest on one narrowed interpretation; "being stuck" is itself such an interpretation. Practical meaning: treat stuckness as a frame to widen, not a fact. [source: Kriz in Kriz & Atkins 2012]
Announce what may distress: participants must be told beforehand about intense or disorienting experiences. [source: Wolf 2011]

4. Intervention inventory

The sources cited describe a session architecture and a set of stances and moves rather than a catalogue of named exercises. The items below are those moves; concrete materials and prompts are marked by source or [synthesis]. Example language is illustrative unless quoted.

4.1 Opening / check-in

Purpose: hear the concern and the wish for the session (clarifying the life situation); decide how far to go today. [source: HKU EXABI protocol; Portland Institute course page, secondary]
Steps: (1) Ask what the client brings and what would make the session worthwhile. (2) Listen for the language of the problem and note any resources mentioned. (3) Check state: sleep, safety, body tension. (4) Keep it brief (about 5–15 minutes in a 50–60 minute session) so time remains for making [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "What are you bringing today, and what would you like to take away from our time?"
Watch for: talk going round the same story is a cue to move to the arts; acute risk takes priority over the arts sequence.

4.2 Warm-up and transition into the arts

Purpose: shift from talk to the senses and body; lower the threshold. [source: HKU EXABI protocol (warm-up phase); Bischofberger 2016 (low-threshold materials)]
Steps [synthesis on specifics]: (1) Offer a short sensory task unrelated to the problem: breathing with sound, stretching and shaking out, scribbling with both hands, handling clay with eyes open. (2) Keep it playful and short (3–10 minutes). (3) Notice which modality the client warms to; use it as the entry for the core work.
Example language (illustrative): "Before we do anything with that, let's just arrive. Take this charcoal and see what kinds of marks it can make."
Watch for: self-consciousness ("I can't draw"); choose a lower-skill material. Knill used charcoal with novices [source: Wolf 2011].

4.3 Framing the arts task (low skill, high sensitivity; range of play)

Purpose: design a task the client can master but that demands attention and sensitivity, with a clear frame and open play inside it. [source: Fuchs-Knill & Knill 2015; Wolf 2011]
Steps: (1) Choose a medium that needs only adequate manual skill (collage, charcoal, clay, simple percussion, short movement phrases, found words). (2) Set a clear frame: material, size, time, and a rule. Knill's example: stone tiles and clay with the rule that no existing letters or symbols be used, starting from form [source: Wolf 2011]. (3) Do not ask the client to depict the problem; Knill rejected prompts such as "paint your fear", "paint your confusion" or "paint your solution" and "close your eyes and just move the brush" [source: Wolf 2011, German, paraphrased]. (4) Set the challenge at the edge of what the client can manage [source: Fuchs-Knill & Knill 2015].
Example language (illustrative): "Here are three colours of paper and a glue stick. Tear, don't cut. Make something that holds together on this sheet. You have fifteen minutes."
Watch for: a task too open (client freezes) or too closed (mechanical compliance). Adjust the rule, not the client.

4.4 Decentering: core arts-making

Purpose: leave the narrowed problem world for the alternative world of making, where unplanned micro-steps and surprise reconnect the client with resources. [source: S. K. Levine 2011 citing Knill 2005; Kriz & Atkins 2012]
Steps: (1) Give the framed task (4.3). (2) Let the client work; stay present and attentive without commentary (non-judgmental witnessing) [source: Atkins in Kriz & Atkins 2012]. (3) Intervene only to support the work (material, space, time, next step), not to interpret. (4) Let the work find its own form rather than steering it toward a planned message [source: S. K. Levine 2011]. (5) Allow 20–45 minutes in a long session [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Keep going with what the material wants next." "What does it need now?"
Watch for: absorption, changes in posture, breathing and pace (signs the client has left the problem frame); repeated returns to problem talk mean the task needs more structure or a different modality.

4.5 Intermodal transfer (shifting modalities)

Purpose: deepen or open a process by moving it into another art form; use polyaesthetic qualities (rhythm in an image, image in a movement). [source: IEATA (intermodal: layering and sequencing two or more modalities); Bischofberger 2016 (intermedialer Transfer, movement to drawing); HKU EXABI protocol]
Steps: (1) When a work is done or the process plateaus, pick a quality in it (a line, a rhythm, a gesture, a phrase). (2) Invite its translation into another medium: an image becomes a movement, the movement a sound, the sound a short poem. (3) Keep each step short and low-skill. (4) Return to the first work to see what has changed.
Example language (illustrative): "Let your hand trace that wavy line in the air. Now let your whole arm move it. What sound goes with it?"
Watch for: a shift that energises versus one that scatters. More than two or three shifts in one session can fragment the work [synthesis].

4.6 Aesthetic coaching (aesthetic responsibility)

Purpose: help the emerging work reach the point where it "works", taking responsibility to the art rather than accepting anything as finished. [source: Fuchs-Knill & Knill 2015]
Steps: (1) When the client pauses, look together at the work. (2) Ask what it still needs; Knill asked "was braucht es noch?" (what does it still need?) [source: Wolf 2011]. (3) In groups or training, Knill tested quality by asking whether a work could go on the road, that is be shown publicly [source: Wolf 2011]. (4) Offer craft help (a frame, a contrast, a pause in music) without taking over. (5) Stop when the work holds together.
Example language (illustrative): "Step back with me. Is it finished, or does it want something more?"
Watch for: perfectionism or self-criticism (return to sensory description, 4.7); compliance with the therapist's taste (ask the client to decide).

4.7 Aesthetic analysis: surface, process, then meaning

Purpose: appreciate the work and the making in detail, widening the client's view before any interpretation. [source: Wolf 2011; Atkins in Kriz & Atkins 2012]
Steps: (1) Greet the work. Knill gave the first feedback himself, not the client [source: Wolf 2011]. (2) Describe the surface: colours, shapes, textures, sounds, movement qualities. (3) Ask the client what they see; Knill's phrase was "Sag mir jetzt, was du siehst!" (tell me now what you see) [source: Wolf 2011]. (4) Ask about the process: how did you get started, where did it change, how did you manage to continue? (5) Only last, meaning: what does the work say, and what did it teach while making it? [source: Wolf 2011] (6) Knill regarded asking about feelings first as presumptuous [source: Wolf 2011].
Example language (illustrative): "I notice the dark band holding the bottom edge, and the small red shape breaking through it. What do you see?" "At the point where you stopped and turned the paper, what happened?"
Watch for: richer, more specific description over time; the client starting to see more in their own work. Rush to interpret means slow down to description.

4.8 Checking the aesthetic response

Purpose: register how the work affects its maker; this shows it has touched the client's lived reality. [source: S. K. Levine 2011]
Steps: (1) After description, ask how it is to look at, hear or remember the work now. (2) Note bodily as well as verbal responses. (3) If there is no response, return to the work rather than pressing.
Example language (illustrative): "Sitting here with it now, what does it do to you?"
Watch for: surprise, being moved, a shift in voice or breath; flatness can signal dissociation (see 5).

4.9 Harvesting: bridging back to the concern

Purpose: name what was experienced and discovered, and mine it for resources and new meanings relevant to the problem brought in. [source: Atkins in Kriz & Atkins 2012; Kriz on multiple meanings]
Steps: (1) Ask what the client discovered while making (about the material, their way of working, their body). (2) Ask how the way they solved difficulties in the work might relate to the situation they came with. (3) Gather resources in words: help the client name strengths, choices and capacities, enriching the language of resources [source: Atkins citing Eberhart]. (4) Allow several meanings to stand side by side rather than one interpretation [source: Kriz]. (5) Do not impose links; the client decides what fits.
Example language (illustrative): "When the clay kept cracking, you wet it and slowed down. Is there anything in that for the week ahead?"
Watch for: new possibilities named in the client's own words; reframed problem descriptions; relief or curiosity. Intellectualising means go back to the work.

4.10 Sharing, witnessing and closure

Purpose: in groups, let works be seen and received; in all sessions, end safely. [source: HKU EXABI protocol (sharing, closure); Atkins (witnessing)]
Steps: (1) In groups, each member shows the work; others describe what they see (surface first, 4.7), without interpreting or advising [synthesis, applying 4.7]. (2) The maker says what they want to keep. (3) Decide what happens to the work (kept, photographed, stored, taken home). (4) Close with a short grounding or shared gesture; check state before leaving.
Example language (illustrative): "Say only what you see and hear in Maria's piece. Maria, you choose what you take from that."
Watch for: group members interpreting each other's work or diagnosing; intervene and return to description.

4.11 Between-session resource gesture

Purpose: carry a resource found in the arts into daily life. [source: Bischofberger 2016]
Steps: (1) From the session, pick a short self-chosen form that carried relief (a gesture, rhythm, line, phrase). (2) Practise it once in session. (3) Agree when it might be used (e.g. when tension rises). (4) Review next session; adapt or drop it.
Example language (illustrative): "That wave movement seemed to settle your breathing. Would you try it once a day, just as it came today?"
Watch for: use without pressure; if it becomes a duty or fails, explore rather than insist.

4.12 Body-centred intermedial entry for traumatised clients (Swiss intermediale case)

Purpose: begin from observed body language and offer materials and movements that let a frozen or dissociated client become active and self-directed. [source: Bischofberger 2016, PTSD case]
Steps (as described in the case, paraphrased): (1) Observe posture and tension on arrival (raised shoulders, turning away). (2) Invite the client to find a place in the room that feels safer (in the case, the floor against a wall). (3) Offer large paper to mark a territory; the client may alter it to fit (the client taped a gap closed). (4) Offer small, low-effort clay forming; let the client arrange and rearrange pieces (read as an inner ordering process). (5) Offer a pencil; follow emerging movement (wavy lines, rocking) as a shift from immobility. (6) Support persistence with quiet, rhythmic words; notice breathing. (7) Agree a self-chosen gesture for between sessions (4.11). Later sessions explored rolling and unrolling movements. The author cites Peter Levine on self-directed ending of immobility.
Example language (illustrative): "Is there somewhere in this room that feels a little better to sit?"
Watch for: increased self-direction, calmer and more regular breathing; withdrawal or freezing means reduce demands and return to place and ground. Trauma processing needs trauma training [synthesis].

4.13 Poetic and verbal shaping

Purpose: use language as an art form (poetry, short texts) and for reflecting on the process. [source: Bischofberger 2016; S. K. Levine 2011 and Levine in Kriz & Atkins 2012 on poetic language bringing direct contact with experience]
Steps [synthesis on specifics]: (1) After visual or movement work, collect words from the aesthetic analysis. (2) Invite a short poem or title using them. (3) Read it aloud; notice voice and pace. (4) Use it in harvesting.
Example language (illustrative): "Take five of the words you used about the piece and arrange them into a few lines."
Watch for: language that is fresh and sensory versus repeating the problem story.

4.14 Community art and social-action work

Purpose: use shared art-making with groups or communities to restore creative capacity and new forms of association. [source: S. K. Levine 2011; Knill's community art per Wikipedia]
Steps (as stances in the source): (1) Enter without a prearranged agenda. (2) First understand the world people already live in, with appreciative curiosity (Eberhart). (3) Help the community find its own resources and imagine new ways of living together. (4) Use shared forms (singing, dancing, building) that bind people; the arts can also hold mourning. (5) Tolerate chaos, improvise, value play. Knill describes a lorry-and-crane installation as a classic low-skill form laypeople can carry out [source: Wolf 2011].
Example language (illustrative): "Before we plan anything, tell us how life here goes on an ordinary day."
Watch for: imposing outside aims; in community settings, this is arts-based change work, and therapy boundaries (consent, confidentiality, referral) must be stated [synthesis].

5. Handling problems

Sources give stances rather than troubleshooting protocols; most responses below are [synthesis] built on the principles in section 3.

"I can't draw / I'm not artistic": lower the skill demand, keep the sensitivity demand (low skill, high sensitivity): switch to collage, torn paper, charcoal, found objects, simple percussion or walking patterns; give a clear rule and time limit. [source for principle: Fuchs-Knill & Knill 2015; Wolf 2011; responses synthesis]
Stuck in the work or in the therapy: Kriz holds that a process never really gets stuck and that "being stuck" is a narrowed interpretation [source: Kriz & Atkins 2012]. Responses [synthesis]: shrink the task (one minute, one colour), change modality (4.5), change scale or position (stand, floor, wall), return to describing the surface (4.7), or ask what the work needs (4.6).
Client keeps talking about the problem instead of making: acknowledge, then offer a short, tightly framed task with its own logic, not a task to depict the problem [synthesis; consistent with Wolf 2011].
Resistance to play or to "childish" materials: present the task as craft with a challenge and a quality standard (aesthetic responsibility) rather than as play therapy; offer adult-feeling materials (charcoal, clay, writing, rhythm) [synthesis].
Overwhelm, flooding, dissociation: stop the task; ground with eyes open, feet on floor, naming objects in the room; move from an evocative medium (fluid paint, eyes-closed movement, loud sound) to a containing one (pencil, small clay pieces, defined paper area); find a safer place in the room [source for the safer-place and small-forms approach: Bischofberger 2016; rest synthesis]. Do not interpret the image in that moment. Announce intense experiences in advance and make them optional [source: Wolf 2011].
Non-adherence to between-session tasks: keep tasks small and self-chosen (4.11); treat non-use as information, explore what got in the way, and adapt [synthesis].
Ruptures: if the client experiences the therapist's first feedback or aesthetic coaching as judgement or takeover, name it, apologise for intruding, and hand the decision back to the client ("you decide whether it's finished") [synthesis]. Guard against the therapist's taste shaping the work.
Pressure to interpret ("What does it mean? What does it say about me?"): explain the sequence: first what we see and how it was made, meaning last and in the client's terms [source: Wolf 2011]. Never offer diagnostic readings of images or movement [synthesis].
Perfectionism, professional artists as clients: shift attention from product quality to process and surprise; use an unfamiliar medium so expertise does not dominate [synthesis].
Disturbing or violent content in the work: do not censor the image [source: Wolf 2011]; assess risk separately and directly in words; distinguish content in the work from intent to act; follow standard suicide and violence risk assessment if content or talk raises concern [synthesis].
Destroying or abandoning the work: allow it as a choice, but slow it down and ask whether to photograph or keep it first; never destroy a client's work yourself [synthesis].
Group problems: members interpreting or advising each other (return to description), domination of sharing time (timed rounds), over-disclosure (contain, offer individual follow-up), unsafe exposure in performance (showing is optional) [synthesis].
Music-specific: sound or songs that trigger traumatic memories, startle from sudden loud sounds, shame about voice, hearing strain from drums; ask in advance, keep volumes moderate, offer ear plugs and quiet options, let the client control volume and stop [synthesis].
Movement-specific: dizziness and falls, pain flare-ups, body shame, discomfort with being looked at; use seated or small-scale options, eyes-open work, and permission to watch rather than move [synthesis]. Touch only with explicit, revocable consent [synthesis].
Cultural material: clients may bring sacred or culturally owned forms (songs, dances, symbols); respect them, do not copy or perform ceremonies, and let the client and their community decide on use [synthesis].
Children: disclosures in art or play trigger safeguarding procedures; record the client's own words, not your interpretation of the image [synthesis].
Limits and contraindications. Kriz states that decentering is often useful for clients who come with a "problem" but is not a good approach for a person in acute breakdown of life's stability (his example: a man who has lost his legs, home and job); there it would be dangerous and irresponsible to destabilise belief systems that still hold him up, and help should go to finding new areas of order [source: Kriz in Kriz & Atkins 2012]. Practical meaning: in crisis, acute loss or collapse, use stabilising, structuring arts tasks and supportive work rather than decentering [synthesis built on Kriz]. Severe mental illness, acute psychosis, active mania: favour structured, grounding, short tasks and avoid prolonged decentering or eyes-closed imaginal work until stable; work alongside the treating team [synthesis; no source cited lists diagnostic contraindications, uncertain].

Sources

Pages consulted:

Further pages consulted (October 2026):

Books cited:

Levine, E. G., Knill, P. J. & Levine, S. K. (2004). Principles and Practice of Expressive Arts Therapy: Toward a Therapeutic Aesthetics. Jessica Kingsley.
Atkins, S. & Eberhart, H. (2014). Presence and Process in Expressive Arts Work: At the Edge of Wonder. Jessica Kingsley.
Knill, P. (1979). Ausdruckstherapie: Künstlerischer Ausdruck in Therapie und Erziehung als intermediale Methode. Ohlsen. [title from Wikipedia; uncertain details]
Knill, P. (1993). Minstrels of the Soul: Intermodal Expressive Therapy. Palmerston Press. [title from Wikipedia]
Knill, P. (2005). Kunstorientiertes Handeln in der Begleitung von Veränderungsprozessen. EGIS. [title from Wikipedia]
Knill, P. J. & Eberhart, H. (2010). Lösungskunst: Lehrbuch der kunst- und ressourcenorientierten Arbeit. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. English translation: Solution Art (2023), Jessica Kingsley (co-authorship per Hachette UK page; Wikipedia lists Knill alone).
Levine, E. G. & Levine, S. K. (Eds.) (2011). Art in Action: Expressive Arts Therapy and Social Change. Jessica Kingsley.

← Previous · VIII-178Video-game therapy Next · VIII-180 →Person-centred expressive arts (N. Rogers)