Atlas›Domain XIV · Western esoteric, divinatory & new spiritual movements›Guide 039
Guide XIV-039

UR Group (Evola)

Arturo Reghini, Julius Evola1927Italy
A 32 · L 56 · M 1214 interventions in the Trinity explorer1 described for recognition only
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: the UR Group as historians of Western esotericism describe it (Hans Thomas Hakl's 2012 study in Aries, as summarised in Baroni 2023; Mark Sedgwick's Against the Modern World, as cited there), the group's own writings in the Inner Traditions English edition (Introduction to Magic, vols I–III, translated by Joscelyn Godwin, with a foreword by Hans Thomas Hakl to vol. II), and present-day reporting by the New York Times and terrorism researchers (CTEC at the Middlebury Institute; GNET at King's College London). [source: Baroni 2023; Simon & Schuster/Inner Traditions vol. II page; NYT via Gulf News; CTEC 2022; GNET 2024]

What it was. The UR Group (Gruppo di UR) was a circle of Italian esotericists who worked together from 1927 to 1929 and issued the monthly journals Ur (1927–28) and Krur (1929). Its publisher's description names its prime movers as Arturo Reghini (1878–1946), a Pythagorean mathematician and reviver of "spiritual" Freemasonry, and Julius Evola (1898–1974), then a young philosopher. Members included occultists, neo-pagans, Freemasons, Anthroposophists, orientalists and poets, writing under pseudonyms. The group's stated aim was to study and practise rituals from Eastern and Western mystery traditions in order to reach a "superhuman" state of consciousness and the power to act magically on the world; "magic" meant, in its own usage, an active attitude to individual development drawing on alchemy, Hermetism, Tantra, Taoism, Buddhism, Vedanta and pagan mysteries. In 1971 Evola collected the essays into three volumes (Introduzione alla magia), which reach readers today as books. [source: Simon & Schuster/Inner Traditions vol. II page; Baroni 2023, pp. 41–42]

Core idea of change (the group's own, attributed). Transformation of consciousness through disciplined concentration, contemplation and ritual work, individually and in coordinated "chains" of practitioners, was held to produce an initiatic, sovereign self. These are the group's claims; they lie outside empirical testing and are neither affirmed nor dismissed here. Evidence status: no controlled research supports claims of supernormal powers or magical action at a distance [uncertain: not verified]. [source: Simon & Schuster/Inner Traditions vol. II page; Baroni 2023, p. 42]

Why it matters clinically today. Evola's later political writings, his racial theory and his ties to Italian Fascism and admiration of the Nazi SS make him a reference point for parts of today's far right, including online accelerationist networks that frame the present as the "Kali Yuga" (a final degenerate age) to be hastened towards collapse. A client may meet the UR material as esoteric reading, or meet Evola first through far-right online spaces and then the esoteric texts. The psychotherapist's task is to understand what the material means to the client, assess without pathologising belief, and recognise and act on radicalisation risk through the official routes. [source: NYT via Gulf News; CTEC 2022; GNET 2024; Home Office 2023/2024]

2. Framework

2a. The historical record (as historians document it)

  • 1927–1928, Ur. Monthly journal; Evola first editor. Contents: practical exercises, accounts of personal experience, translations of ancient and Hermetic texts, essays. Contributors used pseudonyms. [source: Simon & Schuster/Inner Traditions vol. II page; Baroni 2023, p. 42] Membership was never published; an estimate of twelve to fifteen people is attributed to Sedgwick [uncertain: secondary, unverified]. Other named collaborators (the anthroposophist Giovanni Colazza; Giulio Parise) [uncertain: secondary, unverified]. A Kremmerzian, Ercole Quadrelli, is described as a member. [source: Baroni 2023, p. 54]
  • End of 1928 – 1929, split and Krur. Evola's control of the journal grew; Reghini and Parise were removed from its management, and Evola founded Krur in January 1929 [uncertain: secondary, unverified]. Accounts attribute the split to personal disputes and to Evola's objection to Reghini's Freemasonry [uncertain: secondary, unverified]. Ur and Krur together ran 1927–1929. [source: Baroni 2023, pp. 41–42]
  • Political aim. One scholarly account (Furlong 2011) holds that Evola hoped to use magical means to steer Mussolini away from populism towards an aristocratic regime modelled on ancient Roman virtues [uncertain: secondary, unverified].
  • End of operative life. In a 1971 letter to Hakl, Evola said the group's operative existence ended in the late 1920s and urged "caution" about a German edition. [source: Baroni 2023, p. 42]
  • Editions. Italian collected edition 1971 (an earlier 1955 edition is reported [uncertain: secondary, unverified]); German translation by Hakl, vol. 1 1985, vol. 2 1997; English: vol. I 2001 (Introduction to Magic: Rituals and Practical Techniques for the Magus), vol. II 2019 (The Path of Initiatic Wisdom), vol. III reported 2021 [uncertain: secondary, unverified]. Hakl's 2012 Aries article was the first English-language presentation of the group to an international audience. [source: Baroni 2023, pp. 42, 54; Simon & Schuster/Inner Traditions vol. II page]
  • Hakl and "H. T. Hansen". Many of Evola's English and German editions carry introductions or translations credited to "H. T. Hansen"; Baroni's footnotes treat these as Hakl's work, implying the name is Hakl's pen name (not stated in so many words). Hakl's 1991 preface to Men Among the Ruins became a standard introduction to Evola's politics; Baroni notes it omitted Evola's 1960s neofascist involvement and racist writings, and that Hakl later rejected Evola's "numerous unambiguously racist outpourings". [source: Baroni 2023, pp. 44–46, 51]
  • Evola's politics and race theory. Evola was admired by Italian Fascists; Mussolini liked his early writings on race, which the New York Times links to the 1938 Racial Laws against Jews; after reading Evola's 1941 Synthesis of the Doctrine of Race, which argued for a "spiritual" rather than merely biological racism, Mussolini met him in September 1941. Evola later judged Fascism too compromised and preferred the SS, with which he shared antisemitism. The SS research body Ahnenerbe regarded him as a "Roman reactionary", and neither regime adopted his programme. His racism, Baroni notes, extended beyond antisemitism to people of colour and racial mixing. After the war he wrote for Italian neofascist magazines in the 1960s, and Italy's neofascist terrorists of the 1960s–70s treated him as a spiritual godfather, calling themselves "Children of the Sun". [source: NYT via Gulf News; Baroni 2023, pp. 43–46]
  • Later esoteric heirs. The Dioscuri, a group founded in 1969 in Ordine Nuovo circles, reportedly took up themes and practices of the UR Group, including "magic chains". [source: Baroni 2023, p. 54]

2b. Present-day uptake (as reliable sources report it)

  • Books. The UR writings and Evola's other works circulate in English, German and other translations; Sedgwick notes the growth in languages as a sign of renewed interest. [source: NYT via Gulf News; Simon & Schuster/Inner Traditions vol. II page]
  • Political figures and parties. Steve Bannon referred to Evola in a 2014 speech to a Vatican conference; Greece's neo-Nazi Golden Dawn party (not the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn) put Evola on its reading list; the leader of Hungary's Jobbik wrote an introduction to his works; the white nationalist Richard Spencer called Evola "one of the most fascinating men of the 20th century". [source: NYT via Gulf News]
  • Online accelerationist networks. CTEC describes Evola's Traditionalism (a syncretic movement mixing Hermetic occultism, Hindu cyclical time and a lost European paganism) as an ideological base for many accelerationist groups, including from the Iron March forum (2011–2017): adherents see themselves in the Kali Yuga, believe sowing chaos speeds collapse, and may feel "spiritually" motivated towards mass violence. A Lithuanian group profiled by CTEC shared Evola's Metaphysics of War on video platforms alongside "Siege"-culture imagery. GNET (2024) reports that the Active Club Network promotes "Evolian traditionalism", presents itself publicly through group fitness, brotherhood and self-improvement, and uses Telegram for vetting and propaganda. [source: CTEC 2022; GNET 2024]
  • Policy framing (UK). Home Office guidance describes extreme right-wing terrorism as typically informal online communities rather than formal hierarchies, and online radicalisation as the predominant pathway for a growing share of terrorism offenders. [source: Home Office 2023/2024]

2c. The clinical framework (when a client brings this material)

No source gives a therapy protocol for UR or Evola material; the phases below are [synthesis], built on the CFI, the APA Ethics Code and the Prevent duty guidance. No session counts are given because no source sets them.

  1. Engagement and informed consent. Goal: a safe frame, with the limits of confidentiality explained early, including safeguarding and terrorism-related disclosure where law requires it. Move on when the client understands the frame. [source: APA Ethics Code; synthesis]
  2. Meaning and cultural assessment. Goal: understand what the texts, practices or online community mean to the client, using the Cultural Formulation Interview. Move on when the client's explanatory model and the place of the material in their life are clear. [source: APA CFI; synthesis]
  3. Differential and risk assessment. Goal: separate belief and practice from psychiatric symptoms, and separate esoteric interest from extremist involvement; assess risk to self and others. Move on when the formulation includes both. [synthesis; source: Home Office 2023/2024 for radicalisation threshold]
  4. Action on concerns. Goal: where there are concerns of radicalisation, consult the safeguarding or Prevent lead and refer through the official route; otherwise continue therapy. [source: Home Office 2023/2024]
  5. Ongoing work. Goal: address the needs the material or community meets (belonging, purpose, identity, grievance), adverse effects of practice, and family concerns; support disengagement where wanted. [synthesis]
  6. Ending and aftercare. Goal: consolidate alternative sources of meaning and belonging; agree how risk concerns will be handled after ending. [synthesis]

3. Guiding principles

  • Describe history accurately, not polemically. Practical meaning: when asked, give the scholarly picture (including Evola's Fascist ties and racial theory) in a neutral register; avoid both mystique and mockery. [source: Baroni 2023; NYT via Gulf News; synthesis]
  • Interest is not extremism. Practical meaning: reading Evola, Guénon or Hermetic texts, or practising esoteric disciplines, is not itself a sign of radicalisation; assess behaviour, ideology-driven grievance and intent. [synthesis; source: Home Office 2023/2024 on one proportionate threshold]
  • One consistent threshold across ideologies. Practical meaning: apply the same referral threshold you would for any extremist ideology; neither over-refer for esoteric belief nor under-refer because content looks "spiritual". [source: Home Office 2023/2024]
  • Esoteric claims are attributed. Practical meaning: say "the UR writers held that…"; do not affirm or debunk magical claims; give the evidence status in one line if asked. [synthesis]
  • Do not pathologise belief. Practical meaning: unusual spiritual experience is assessed for distress, function and fit with the client's culture before any psychiatric label; the ICD-10-CM code Z65.8 lists "religious or spiritual problem" for problems that are not disorders. [source: Unbound Medicine ICD-10-CM Z65.8; APA CFI]
  • Cultural humility and competence. Practical meaning: where understanding of religion or culture is essential, obtain training or consultation, or refer. [source: APA Ethics Code Principle E]
  • Public outline only for ritual. Practical meaning: discuss what a practice is for and how the client experiences it; never teach, rehearse or supervise ritual or magical practice in therapy. [synthesis]
  • The therapist is not an initiator or teacher. Practical meaning: no recommending texts, no interpreting the client's "progress" on an initiatic path, no joining the client's practice. [source: APA Ethics Code 3.05; synthesis]
  • Safeguarding is part of care. Practical meaning: Prevent in health is framed as safeguarding vulnerable people, and a referral is a route to support; Channel is voluntary and needs consent. [source: Home Office 2023/2024]
  • Confidentiality with lawful limits. Practical meaning: share the minimum necessary, lawfully, preferably with consent; disclose without consent only where law requires or permits to protect from harm. [source: APA Ethics Code; Home Office 2023/2024]
  • Needs before ideology. Practical meaning: explore what the space gives the client (brotherhood, fitness, meaning, an explanation for suffering) as the main lever for change. [synthesis; source: GNET 2024 on fitness and brotherhood framing]
  • Victims and private individuals are not named. Practical meaning: in notes and discussion, refer to roles rather than people the client encounters online. [synthesis]

4. Intervention inventory

The UR Group is a historical current, not a therapy. The inventory has two parts: (A) the group's own practices, in public outline only, so the therapist can recognise what a client may be doing; (B) the psychotherapist's procedures. Part B is [synthesis] unless a source is tagged.

A. The group's practices (public outline only)

The publisher's description of vol. II names: initiatory exercises; work on a "diaphanous body" of the Opus magicum (the magical work); establishing initiatic consciousness after death; and "magical chains", in which several practitioners coordinate a shared intention while each keeps distinct self-awareness and control, supported by individual daily contemplations and affirmations before meetings. Secondary accounts add that local "chains" met in Rome and other cities and that the practices drew mainly on Rudolf Steiner's exercises for spiritual development, plus Buddhist, Tantric and Hermetic techniques, with initiatic asceticism central [uncertain: secondary, unverified]. Evola's later writings on sexuality and Tantra exist and are framed by scholars as part of his esoteric work; they are not described here. Ritual steps, words, gestures and sequences are not given; a client who wants instruction is directed to the community and its published texts, not to the therapist. [source: Simon & Schuster/Inner Traditions vol. II page; synthesis]

What the therapist needs to know: these practices involve sustained concentration, visualisation, affirmation of an exalted self, after-death and "body of light" imagery, and coordinated group intention. Clinically relevant features are intensity, solitude, grandiose self-concepts and group pressure, not the content as such. [synthesis]

B1. Client-led exploration of meaning

  • Purpose / when: First response when a client mentions Evola, the UR texts, Traditionalism, "Kali Yuga" or related online spaces. Establishes what the material means before any judgement.
  • Steps: (1) Ask permission to explore. (2) Ask how they came to it (book, friend, video, forum, gym or fitness group). (3) Ask what it gives them: ideas, practice, community, an explanation of their suffering, a sense of strength. (4) Reflect back in the client's own terms ("tradition", "initiation", "decline"). (5) Note, without challenge yet, any political, racial or violent content.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You mentioned the UR writings. Would you be willing to tell me how you came across them and what drew you in?" / "When you say the world is in the Kali Yuga, what does that mean for how you live day to day?"
  • Watch for: relief at being heard (working); guardedness or testing whether you will condemn them (slow down, restate confidentiality limits); content that moves quickly from spirituality to dehumanising language about groups (note for B6–B7).

B2. Cultural Formulation Interview, with the religion and spirituality module

  • Purpose / when: Early assessment, to understand the client's explanatory model and the role of esoteric identity. [source: APA CFI]
  • Steps: Follow the core CFI's sections in your own words: the client's definition of the problem; perceived causes, stressors and supports, including what parts of their background or identity help or hurt; self-coping and past help-seeking, including barriers; current help-seeking; and concerns about the clinician relationship. Add the supplementary module on religion and spirituality (the published module list names it). Do not use the CFI as the sole basis for diagnosis. [source: APA CFI]
  • Example language (illustrative): "In your own words, what is the main problem you'd like help with?" / "Do you think there's anything about our different backgrounds or views that might get in the way here?"
  • Watch for: whether the client sees esoteric practice as the solution, the problem, or unrelated; family or community views (B9); anticipation of judgement by a therapist presumed to be liberal or secular (address openly).

B3. Historical information on request

  • Purpose / when: When the client asks what you know, or holds clearly inaccurate beliefs (for example that Evola had no Fascist ties, or that the UR texts are an unbroken ancient lineage).
  • Steps: (1) Ask what they already know and what they want. (2) Give a short, sourced, neutral summary: a 1927–1929 Italian circle; journals with exercises, translations and essays; Evola's later racial theory, his ties to Fascism and admiration of the SS, and his influence on postwar neofascism, as historians and major newspapers report it. (3) Offer the sources rather than argue. (4) Return to the client's experience. [source: Baroni 2023; NYT via Gulf News; synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Historians who study him, including some who translated his books, describe a close relationship with Fascism and a racial theory. How does that sit with what drew you to him?"
  • Watch for: defensiveness (back off to B1); curiosity and separating the esoteric interest from the politics (working); the client seeking your endorsement for a reading list (decline; see B12).

B4. Differential assessment without pathologising belief

  • Purpose / when: When the client reports unusual experiences (presences, out-of-body states, "powers", after-death consciousness work) or functional decline.
  • Steps: (1) Separate belief, which is cultural, from symptoms: assess onset, distress, function, sleep, perceptual changes, thought form, mood elevation, dissociation. (2) Ask whether peers in the same tradition would see the experience as expected. (3) Screen for psychosis, mania or hypomania (grandiosity tied to "superhuman" self-concepts), dissociation, derealisation and depersonalisation, OCD-type scrupulosity about ritual correctness, and substance use. (4) Where the issue is spiritual rather than a disorder, consider the Z65.8 "religious or spiritual problem" code. (5) Refer for psychiatric assessment where indicated. [source: Unbound Medicine ICD-10-CM Z65.8; APA CFI; synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Some people find these exercises calming, others find they leave them feeling unreal or very wound up. What's it been like for you?"
  • Watch for: sleep loss, escalating hours of solitary practice, belief that others are controlling them or that they control events, fixed ideas of a mission; these call for medical assessment, not debate.

B5. Practice adverse-effects review

  • Purpose / when: When the client practises UR-derived or similar exercises alone or in a "chain".
  • Steps: (1) Ask what they do in general terms (concentration, visualisation, group intention), not the steps. (2) Ask about frequency, solitude, and pressure from a group or teacher. (3) Ask about effects on sleep, mood, relationships, work. (4) Agree a client-chosen plan (for example, pausing intensive practice while symptoms are assessed). Never instruct, modify or supervise the practice. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I won't ask you to tell me anything you've agreed to keep private. I'm interested in how the practice is affecting your sleep and your mood."
  • Watch for: derealisation, panic, intrusive imagery, grandiosity, isolation from non-practitioners, a teacher or group discouraging outside help.

B6. Informed consent and the confidentiality frame

  • Purpose / when: At the outset, and again whenever political or violent content emerges.
  • Steps: (1) Explain the nature of therapy, fees and the limits of confidentiality early. (2) Name, in plain terms, that serious risk to the client or others, and in the UK concerns about possible involvement in terrorism, may lead to consultation or disclosure. (3) Revisit this when circumstances change rather than surprising the client later. [source: APA Ethics Code; Home Office 2023/2024]
  • Example language (illustrative): "What you say here stays private, with a few exceptions I'd like to be upfront about: if I believed you or someone else were at serious risk of harm, I might need to talk to others. If that ever came up, I'd aim to discuss it with you first."
  • Watch for: a client withdrawing after the explanation (normalise; the frame is the same for everyone); a client probing exactly what would be reported (stay general and honest, consult).

B7. Mapping online exposure and the pathway

  • Purpose / when: When the client met Evola through social media, forums, video platforms, Telegram channels or fitness/"active" clubs.
  • Steps: (1) Ask which spaces, how often, and whether contact has moved from public feeds to private or vetted channels (GNET describes vetting and private channels in the Active Club Network). (2) Ask what the community offers: fitness, brotherhood, a story of decline ("Kali Yuga"), purpose. (3) Ask about exposure to content celebrating collapse or violence, "Siege"-style imagery or calls to action (CTEC). (4) Ask about the client's own posting or sharing. (5) Note sleep, isolation and time spent online. [source: GNET 2024; CTEC 2022; synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Some groups start with training and brotherhood and later move people into private chats. Has anything like that happened for you?" / "What do people in that space say should happen as things collapse?"
  • Watch for: movement from public to private channels; dehumanising language; fascination with past attackers; accelerationist talk of hastening collapse; requests for proof of identity or photos to join (vetting, per GNET).

B8. Radicalisation concern check ("notice, check, share")

  • Purpose / when: When B1–B7 raise a concern that the client may be on a pathway towards terrorism (UK) or violent extremism.
  • Steps (UK): (1) Notice the concern and record what you observed in factual terms. (2) Check with your designated safeguarding lead or Prevent lead (in the NHS, the safeguarding lead), or if you have none, the local authority Prevent lead or police for advice. (3) Share through the Prevent national referral form where a referral is warranted. If there is suspicion of involvement in illegal terrorist activity, inform the police immediately. Apply one proportionate threshold across all ideologies; the guidance says it is better to receive referrals that prove not to be of concern than to miss someone who needs support. [source: Home Office 2023/2024]
  • Steps (outside England and Wales): Use your jurisdiction's equivalent safeguarding, threat-assessment or law-enforcement route and your professional body's guidance [uncertain: not verified].
  • Example language (illustrative, to a colleague): "I'd like advice on a client who has moved from fitness content into private channels sharing accelerationist material. I'm not sure whether this meets the threshold."
  • Watch for: your own over-reaction to unfamiliar esoteric content, or under-reaction because it looks spiritual (one threshold); in independent practice, whether you are a specified authority or contracted to an NHS provider (the duty covers NHS trusts and foundation trusts; NHS-commissioned providers carry contractual Prevent obligations). [source: Home Office 2023/2024]

B9. Referral and consent conversation (UK Prevent and Channel)

  • Purpose / when: When a referral is made or being considered.
  • Steps: (1) Where safe and lawful, discuss the referral with the client before or as it is made. (2) Explain that the police assess whether the person should be considered for Channel; Channel is a multi-agency programme chaired by the local authority, voluntary, and requires the person's consent (or a parent's or guardian's if under 18). (3) Explain that if Channel is not suitable, alternatives such as mental health services or children's social care may be explored. (4) Share the minimum necessary information lawfully. (5) Continue therapy where possible; co-operate with a Channel panel so far as appropriate and practicable. [source: Home Office 2023/2024; APA Ethics Code]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I've been worried about where some of these groups are heading, and I've asked for advice. The programme that may contact you is voluntary and aimed at support. I'd like to keep working with you whatever happens."
  • Watch for: rupture and feelings of betrayal (see section 5); escalation of grievance; disengagement from therapy at the point of greatest risk.

B10. Working with the needs the space meets

  • Purpose / when: Ongoing work once risk is assessed.
  • Steps: (1) List with the client what the material or community gives them (belonging, structure, masculinity or strength, meaning in suffering, a sense of being special or "initiated"). (2) Explore the costs (relationships, work, mood, legal risk, hostility to others). (3) Identify other ways to meet each need: non-extremist fitness or sport groups, study of religion or philosophy in academic or open settings, community or faith groups the client chooses. (4) Link to values the client holds. [synthesis; source: GNET 2024 on fitness and brotherhood framing]
  • Example language (illustrative): "It sounds like the training and the sense of brotherhood matter a lot. If those were available somewhere without the rest of it, what would that be like?"
  • Watch for: the client generating alternatives themselves (working); "no one else understands" thinking that deepens isolation.

B11. Family and relationship concerns

  • Purpose / when: When a partner or parent is worried, or the client has become estranged.
  • Steps: (1) With consent, explore how family see the change. (2) Support communication that stays connected without endorsing ideology. (3) Where the concerned person is the client, help them notice, check and share concerns through the official routes and the ACT Early website the Home Office points the public to. (4) Where children are in the household, consider safeguarding duties for children exposed to violent or racist ideology. [source: Home Office 2023/2024; synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative, to a parent client): "Staying in contact, even when you disagree, is often what keeps a door open. What would help you stay connected?"
  • Watch for: family coercion that pushes the person further into the online space; a family member's own safety.

B12. Disengagement and identity reconstruction

  • Purpose / when: When the client wants to leave an online community or rethink an Evola-based worldview.
  • Steps: (1) Respect the client's pace. (2) Plan practical steps the client chooses (muting or leaving channels, digital hygiene, telling a trusted person). (3) Work on shame, loss of belonging and fear of retaliation. (4) Help the client keep what they value (for example, interest in history of religion or physical training) while separating it from the ideology. (5) Refer to specialist disengagement services where available [uncertain: not verified]. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Leaving a group that gave you a lot can feel like losing part of yourself. What parts of who you've become do you want to keep?"
  • Watch for: grief, loneliness, intimidation or doxxing threats (safety plan; police where there are threats); relapse into channels during low mood.

B13. Therapist boundaries and self-monitoring

  • Purpose / when: Throughout.
  • Steps: (1) Do not act as teacher, initiator or reader; do not recommend or interpret esoteric texts or practices. (2) If you have your own esoteric or political interests, keep them out of the room and avoid multiple relationships (for example, meeting in the same groups). (3) Monitor your reactions (fear, contempt, fascination) and take them to supervision. (4) Obtain consultation on extremism or religion where needed, or refer. [source: APA Ethics Code 3.05; synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I'm not the right person to guide you in the practice itself, but I'm glad to think with you about how it's affecting your life."
  • Watch for: the client recruiting you to their view or testing your politics; your own avoidance of difficult content.

5. Handling problems

No source addresses therapy with clients drawn to UR or Evola material; the guidance below is [synthesis] except where a source is tagged.

  • Client wants you to engage with the magic ("do you think it works?"). Response: state your role; attribute the claims; offer the one-line evidence status; return to effects on their life. (illustrative) "That's a question the tradition answers in its own way. My part is to help you look at what it's doing for you and what it's costing."
  • Client defends Evola's racial or political views, or uses dehumanising language. Response: stay calm and curious; do not debate at length; name the impact of the words on others and on the client's relationships; assess for grievance, intent and capability (B7–B8). Your values may be stated briefly without lecturing. (illustrative) "I see this differently, and I want to understand what has led you here."
  • Stuck: the client sees the present as the Kali Yuga and change as pointless. Response: explore the despair or anger beneath the framework; look for small, valued actions; assess for depression and suicidal thinking with standard risk assessment. Apocalyptic urgency, isolation and talk of hastening collapse are escalation signs (CTEC 2022 describes the accelerationist reading).
  • Overwhelm or dissociation after intensive practice. Response: grounding and orientation in the present; client-chosen pause in intensive practice; medical or psychiatric assessment if psychotic or manic features appear (B4). Do not instruct alternative techniques from the tradition.
  • Non-adherence and missed sessions after political content arises. Response: reach out, normalise, restate the frame; consider whether non-attendance raises safeguarding concern in context.
  • Rupture after a Prevent consultation or referral. Response: acknowledge the client's anger; explain honestly what was done and why, within lawful limits; restate that Channel is voluntary and support-focused; keep the door open. [source: Home Office 2023/2024 on Channel; synthesis]
  • Fear of over-referral (the client is an esotericist or pagan with no extremist involvement). Response: apply the single proportionate threshold; consult rather than refer when unsure; document reasons. Interest in Traditionalism, Hermeticism or Evola's esoteric books is not itself a risk indicator. [source: Home Office 2023/2024; synthesis]
  • Imminent risk to others. Response: follow emergency procedures; contact police; record. Where there is suspicion of illegal terrorist activity, the guidance says to inform the police immediately. [source: Home Office 2023/2024]
  • Disclosure of past offences or current plans. Response: consult your safeguarding lead, professional body and legal advice; disclose only as law requires or permits. [source: APA Ethics Code]
  • Minors. Response: safeguarding procedures for children; under-18 Channel consent rests with a parent or guardian; involve children's social care where indicated; never name minors in shared records beyond what procedures require. [source: Home Office 2023/2024]
  • Therapist's own reactions (fear, disgust, fascination). Response: supervision; consider whether you have the competence or should refer (APA Ethics Code).
  • Client is a practitioner in a contemporary group inspired by UR "chains". Response: assess group pressure, secrecy, discouragement of outside help, and financial or time demands; explore leaving if the client wishes; refer to the community for questions of practice and to supervision for questions of risk.

Sources

Books and articles cited (as cited in the sources above):

  • Hakl, H. T. (2012). "Julius Evola and the UR Group." Aries 12: 53–90 (as cited in Baroni 2023).
  • Sedgwick, M. Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press [uncertain: edition and year not verified; cited as 2009 in Baroni 2023].
  • Furlong, P. (2011). Social and Political Thought of Julius Evola [uncertain: secondary, unverified].
← Previous · XIV-038Fraternitas Saturni (1928)Next · XIV-040 →Kremmerzian Hermeticism (Brotherhood of Myriam)