Atlas›Domain XIV · Western esoteric, divinatory & new spiritual movements›Guide 114
Guide XIV-114

Life-between-lives work (Newton)

Michael Newton1994
A 32 · L 58 · M 1016 interventions in the Trinity explorer
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: Life Between Lives (LBL) hypnotherapy as developed by Michael Newton and as the Michael Newton Institute (MNI) publishes it today on its public pages, its Code of Ethics and its training pathway, with Newton's Journey of Souls (1994), Destiny of Souls (2000) and Life Between Lives: Hypnotherapy for Spiritual Regression (2004) as the founding texts. [source: newtoninstitute.org; MNI Pathways to LBL Training; Bookshop.org book description]

LBL is an esoteric spiritual practice delivered by hypnotists whom MNI trains and certifies; it is not a psychotherapy. MNI describes it as "a deep hypnotic guided process that allows you to remember your experience of the afterlife": a journey into the "inter-life," the state between incarnations in which, in the current's own terms, the person exists as "a pure energy being." [source: newtoninstitute.org/life-between-lives] Its idea of how change happens is spiritual rather than clinical: by remembering an immortal identity and receiving counsel from "spirit guides" and a "Council of Elders," the client is said to gain renewed purpose, less fear of death, and "healing and expanded consciousness" in the present life. [source: newtoninstitute.org/life-between-lives] These are the current's claims, described as it holds them.

This guide is for a psychotherapist whose client has had an LBL session, has booked or is considering one, is bereaved and drawn to it, or lives within Newton's framework. The therapist never performs LBL, past-life regression or any induction, and neither validates nor debunks the content. The therapist's work is cultural assessment, exploration of meaning, differential assessment without pathologising belief, psychoeducation about suggestion and memory, preparation and debriefing around sessions the client chooses, grief work, protection from dependency and exploitation, family work, complaints support and referral. No induction or regression scripts are given. Companion guides: 113 (past-life regression), 115 (Quantum Healing Hypnosis Technique) and Domain VI 110 (regression hypnotherapy harm account), which share the suggestion and false-memory material.

Evidence status (one line): no controlled evidence establishes between-life memories, spirit guides or a Council of Elders; in experiments on hypnotic past-life regression the hypnotist's prior suggestions shaped the "remembered" persona, and Ian Stevenson, founder of the University of Virginia's Division of Perceptual Studies, judged that "nearly all such hypnotically evoked 'previous personalities' are entirely imaginary." [source: UVA DOPS, Concerns about hypnotic regression; Spanos et al. 1991 and Baker 1982 as cited there; psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/articles/past-life-regression] Outcome or adverse-event studies of LBL itself: none in the sources cited here [uncertain: not verified].

2. Framework

The LBL process as MNI publishes it. A standalone Past Life Regression (PLR) session, about 1.5–2 hours, is a prerequisite: it is used to "confirm that the superconscious can be opened" and to acclimatise the client to deep trance; "Some preliminary sessions may be required also," and MNI reports that people who "skip the PLR" more often have "disappointing experiences." [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq] The LBL session itself is a single long sitting, which MNI says "may be from 2.5 – 5 hours, depending on the individual." [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq] Preparation suggested to clients: a quiet-mind practice such as guided meditation, and a prepared list of questions; reading the LBL books beforehand is optional and "in some ways … better if you don't." [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq]

Within the session. MNI describes beginning with "complete physical relaxation" and hypnotic guidance to an altered state in which the "subconscious and the superconscious" are accessed; a past life is revisited first as a bridge, then the client is guided to the moment after death and into the spirit world, where, in the current's terms, the client meets "spirit guides" and a "Council of Elders." [source: newtoninstitute.org/life-between-lives] Newton's books describe the spirit world in further stages; those stages are not summarised here [uncertain: not verified]. These are the current's spiritual claims; they are not offered here as fact.

Facilitator training and certification. Applicants need at least 200 hours of formal hypnotherapy education covering age regression, trauma release techniques and past-life regression, and must have conducted at least 40 PLR sessions; "Only qualified and experienced practitioners are accepted." Required reading is Newton's three books. Training is a 16-day event with a high trainer-to-student ratio and support from a "LaB Coach"; students submit case studies, and a final case is evaluated by an independent LaB Coach. Graduates are invited to become Certified LBL Facilitators and MNI members, are listed in the facilitator directory and can join a continuing-education programme. All students agree to the MNI Code of Ethics. Training fees are not stated on the pathway page. [source: MNI, Pathways to LBL Training] MNI cites a network of "over 200 individuals" in about 40 countries, each running an independent practice. [source: newtoninstitute.org/find-lbl-facilitator; newtoninstitute.org/michael-newton-institute]

The MNI Code of Ethics as published. Facilitators are to act in the client's best interest and not work when "ill, exhausted, under the influence of drugs or alcohol"; explain the experience beforehand and discuss the client's expectations, intentions and goals, including the range of physiological and emotional experiences that may occur; assess readiness through history or intake, while stating that they "cannot be responsible for anything deliberately withheld by a client"; assess prior regression experience, a PLR with the same facilitator first being "strongly recommended"; keep communications and records confidential and give clients recordings unaltered; obtain consent before recording, sharing or publishing session material; pause, reschedule or cancel when rapport is compromised; declare costs and cancellation terms in advance and agree payment before the session; advertise truthfully, with realistic claims; and tell clients that any additional services are not endorsed by MNI and deliver them separately from LBL. MNI states that facilitators run independent businesses for whose practices it is not responsible, but that members must follow the code to keep certification. Concerns go through a complaint form on the MNI site; a formal process is overseen by the Director of Membership and an independent Ethics Panel. The public code sets out no mental-health or medical screening criteria, exclusions or referral duties. [source: MNI, Values and Ethics]

Costs. MNI does not publish a fee: "the price of an LBL session varies across countries and regions," and clients are directed to individual facilitators. [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq] A client typically pays for the prerequisite PLR plus the long LBL session and any preliminary sessions, so costs are substantial and set privately by each facilitator [synthesis].

The therapist's clinical frame (not phases of LBL). No source gives a session count for the therapist's work. It runs in five phases that may overlap; the work returns to phase 1 whenever the presentation changes [synthesis]:

  1. Engagement and cultural assessment. Goal: understand what LBL means and does for this client, and rule a treatable disorder in or out (4.1–4.3, 4.16). Move on when a shared formulation in the client's words exists and risk has been assessed.
  2. Psychoeducation and decision support. Goal: an informed choice about sessions (4.4, 4.5, 4.10). Move on when the client has decided, with a preparation and debrief plan, or has chosen to wait.
  3. Debrief and integration after any session. Goal: stabilise and integrate (4.6, 4.8, 4.9). Move on when sleep, orientation and functioning are back to baseline.
  4. Work on the underlying concern: grief, death anxiety, purpose, relationships, trauma symptoms (4.2, 4.7, 4.8, 4.11), with dependency and cost monitored throughout (4.10).
  5. Children, referral, boundaries and complaints as they arise, and closing (4.12–4.15).

3. Guiding principles

  • Belief is not a symptom. Acceptance of souls, guides, past lives or an afterlife is a spiritual position, explored through the Cultural Formulation Interview, which is not meant to be the sole basis for a diagnosis. [source: DSM-5-TR CFI] Practical meaning: assess the form, function and impact of experiences, not the content of belief.
  • Record the focus of care without pathologising. ICD-10-CM Z65.8 "Other specified problems related to psychosocial circumstances" lists "Religious or spiritual problem" as an inclusion term. [source: Unbound Medicine, ICD-10-CM Z65.8] The DSM-5-TR category Religious or Spiritual Problem is coded Z65.8; its DSM-5-TR wording is [uncertain: not verified]. Practical meaning: code the problem being addressed, never the belief as disorder.
  • The therapist never performs LBL. No induction, trance, regression, PLR, LBL or "guided journey" with therapy clients, and no readings, channelled messages or interpretations of what a guide "meant." [synthesis] Practical meaning: if the client wants a session, it happens elsewhere.
  • Autonomy. A competent adult may choose LBL; the therapist neither prescribes nor forbids it, and supports an informed choice. [synthesis] Practical meaning: inform, screen, prepare and debrief; do not refer for LBL as a treatment.
  • Client's own language and consent. Use the client's terms (guide, soul group, Council) with a light gloss; explore only what the client wants explored. [synthesis] Practical meaning: ask before each new line of enquiry.
  • Even-handed about the claims. Neither endorse the afterlife content as literal fact nor ridicule it. [source: newtoninstitute.org; psi-encyclopedia] Practical meaning: "what it means" before "whether it happened," and the second question is the client's to settle.
  • Hypnotic "memory" is reconstructive. Convincing pseudomemories can be constructed (British Psychological Society working party 1995, as summarised by Davies et al. 1998), and a marked emotional experience during regression "provides no assurance" that a past life was recovered (Stevenson). [source: Davies et al. 1998; UVA DOPS] Practical meaning: vividness, emotion and symptom relief are not evidence of literal truth.
  • No memory-recovery work. Patient guidelines based on the BPS report discourage memory-recovery techniques, particularly hypnosis (Mollon, as summarised by Davies et al. 1998); belief in repression may lead therapists to "suggestively dig for hidden memories of abuse" (Otgaar et al. 2022). [source: Davies et al. 1998; Otgaar et al. 2022] Practical meaning: never use hypnosis, guided imagery or repeated probing to "find out more."
  • Neutral about content, attentive to effects. Nightmares, intrusions, derealisation or guilt after a session are real symptoms whatever their source. [synthesis] Practical meaning: treat the symptom without adjudicating the story.
  • Grief and death anxiety first. MNI presents LBL as a way to transcend the fear of death [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq]; bereaved clients may hope to meet the dead in the spirit world. [synthesis] Practical meaning: work with the loss and the fear directly.
  • Altered-state practices carry adverse effects. In meditation research adverse events are "not uncommon" and occur in people with no prior mental-health history (Farias et al. 2020, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica), and challenging meditation-related experiences are well documented (Lindahl et al. 2017, PLOS ONE); Stevenson notes that a regressed persona may not go away on request, leaving a person altered for days. [source: Farias et al. 2020, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica; Lindahl et al. 2017, PLOS ONE; UVA DOPS] Applying the meditation findings to LBL is extrapolation [synthesis]. Practical meaning: ask about after-effects routinely.
  • Dependency and cost are clinical data. Repeated paid sessions and reliance on "guidance" for ordinary decisions are signals; Stevenson opposed practitioners who charge fees for past-life recovery. [source: UVA DOPS] [synthesis] Practical meaning: track spend and decision-making as you would any reliance.
  • Spiritual and religious competence. Work within recognised competencies for spirituality in therapy (Vieten et al. 2013). [uncertain: not verified] Practical meaning: know your own reactions to afterlife beliefs and seek consultation.
  • Boundaries and multiple relationships. A therapist who also practises hypnosis, PLR or LBL keeps that work entirely out of the therapy relationship. [source: APA Ethics Code, multiple relationships] [uncertain: not verified] [synthesis] Practical meaning: refer out; never blend roles.
  • Safeguard children and vulnerable adults. Screen for psychosis, mania, dissociation, acute grief and suicidal ideation before supporting any trance work; LBL is not suitable for children. [synthesis] Practical meaning: postpone, refer, protect.
  • Community involvement only with consent. If the client wishes, involve a spiritual adviser or community member they trust; the therapist's clinical opinion stays distinct. [synthesis]

4. Intervention inventory

These are the therapist's own procedures for a client whose life touches LBL. None involves induction, trance, regression or delivering LBL, and no induction or regression scripts are given. Interventions 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.8 and 4.9 share material with 113 (past-life regression), 115 (QHHT) and Domain VI 110 (regression hypnotherapy harm account).

4.1 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) with the spirituality, religion and moral traditions module

  • Purpose / when: At intake, or when LBL first surfaces, to understand the practice in the client's own framework before any assessment or intervention, so that belief is not mislabelled as pathology.
  • Steps: (1) Explain that you ask everyone about what matters to them culturally and spiritually. (2) Work through the core CFI's domains in your own order: the client's definition of the problem; their view of its causes and what family and community think; stressors, supports and the role of cultural identity; self-coping and past help-seeking, including medical, traditional and spiritual help (record PLR and LBL sessions, reading, online groups here); barriers; the help they want now; and any concern about you or the clinic, such as fear of being dismissed. [source: DSM-5-TR CFI] (3) Where the spiritual frame is central, add the Spirituality, Religion and Moral Traditions module: identity and affiliations, the tradition's role in daily life, family life and major decisions, practices and their frequency and importance, how it helps coping (leaders, texts, media, practices), and whether it has contributed to the problem or to distress, discrimination or conflict. [source: CFI supplementary modules] (4) Add the Explanatory Model, Social Network or Coping and Help-Seeking modules as needed, and the Informant Version for a family member with consent. [source: CFI supplementary modules] (5) The APA permits clinicians to reproduce the CFI for use with their own patients; use the published form, not altered versions. [source: DSM-5-TR CFI] (6) Write a short formulation in the client's words and check it with them.
  • Example language (illustrative): "When you think about what your session showed you, what does it explain for you? Who else in your life sees it the way you do, and who sees it differently?"
  • Watch for: the client expecting you to confirm the content; distress if family reject the belief; the belief carrying the whole weight of an unresolved loss. Working when the client says you have understood how they see things.

4.2 Client-led exploration of meaning

  • Purpose / when: Ongoing, when the client wants to make sense of an LBL experience or of Newton's framework (guides, the Council of Elders, life purpose). The material is used as the client's meaning-making, like a significant dream or image, not as verified history.
  • Steps: (1) Ask what they want from exploring it (comfort, a decision, understanding a relationship, less fear of death). (2) Invite the narrative at their pace, then ask what it means now. (3) Reflect themes (purpose, forgiveness, belonging, a relationship, mortality) in their words. (4) Link themes to present values, relationships and choices. (5) Notice frames that may hurt, such as the idea that one "chose" a painful life or an abuser, and explore their effect without arguing theology. (6) Hold the literal or metaphorical question open. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let's set aside whether it was literally the past and stay with what it stirred in you. What felt most important about meeting that guide?"
  • Watch for: drift into you adjudicating truth; the client seeking a "reading" from you; self-blame drawn from "life-plan" ideas; avoidance of a present problem. Working when the client connects the material to concrete choices and affect softens.

4.3 Differential assessment without pathologising belief

  • Purpose / when: Early, and whenever presentation shifts, to distinguish a held belief or a vivid hypnotic experience from a treatable disorder.
  • Steps: Assess against, not instead of, the belief, using a standard mental state examination and corroborated functioning [synthesis]: (1) Psychosis: guides or the Council experienced as external voices or commands outside sessions, passivity, thought interference, loss of insight, versus a framework held at arm's length. (2) Mania or hypomania: a sudden "mission," reduced need for sleep, spending on sessions, pressured speech. (3) Dissociation: depersonalisation, derealisation, amnesia, identity disturbance, a "past-life" persona that persists (Stevenson describes regressed personas that did not go away on request [source: UVA DOPS]); screen for dissociative identity disorder before any trance work. (4) OCD and scrupulosity: compulsive consulting of guidance, reassurance-seeking, fear of "karmic" consequences. (5) Grief: continued-bonds comfort versus blocked or prolonged mourning (4.7). (6) Depression and suicide risk: the spirit world described as "home" can sit alongside a wish to die; ask directly about suicidal thoughts and plans and follow standard risk assessment and safety planning. (7) Trauma symptoms after a session (4.8, 4.9).
  • Example language (illustrative): "When you think about your guide during the week, is it something you can step back from and question, or does it feel like it's coming from outside you?"
  • Watch for: command phenomena, mounting conviction that erodes functioning, self-neglect, sleep loss, any death wish. Any of these moves the plan toward psychiatric assessment (4.13). Belief alone, held flexibly, is not a disorder. [source: DSM-5-TR CFI] [synthesis]

4.4 Suggestion and false-memory psychoeducation

  • Purpose / when: When a client treats LBL content as proven fact, plans major decisions on it, or is distressed by "memories" from a session; also before a booked session (4.5). Cross-refer 113, 115 and Domain VI 110.
  • Steps: (1) Ask permission and say you are not trying to take anything away. (2) Start from the practice's own account: MNI describes hypnosis as "directed by suggestion." [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq] (3) Explain that memory is reconstructive and that convincing pseudomemories can be constructed (BPS working party 1995, as summarised by Davies et al. 1998). (4) Give the research in plain terms: in implantation studies roughly 30% of people (weighted mean) came to report false autobiographical memories, more when suggestions were self-relevant and involved imagination, and repeated suggestion over time may raise the rate (Otgaar et al. 2022); in hypnotic past-life experiments the hypnotist's prior suggestions shaped the "remembered" persona (Baker 1982; Spanos et al. 1991, as cited by UVA DOPS). (5) Add that strong emotion and symptom relief are not proof (Stevenson). [source: UVA DOPS] (6) Offer a both-and frame: deeply meaningful, not necessarily historical. (7) Do no memory work to "check" content. Normalise that this is how human memory works, not gullibility. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "In a state that deep, the mind can build something vivid and moving that still isn't a record of events. Both can be true at once: it can matter a great deal and not be history."
  • Watch for: shame or feeling debunked (slow down, return to meaning); timing (not in acute post-session distress, stabilise first); life-changing conclusions built on session content. Working when the client can hold the content as meaningful but uncertain.

4.5 Preparing a client who has booked a session

  • Purpose / when: A competent adult has booked, or is about to book, an LBL session. The therapist supports an informed choice and safety, and does not refer for LBL as treatment. [synthesis]
  • Steps: (1) Motive: ask what they hope for (contact with someone who died, purpose, relief of fear, answers about a relationship) and what they will do if it does not come. (2) Format and expectations: MNI describes a prerequisite PLR, possible preliminary sessions and an LBL session of 2.5 to 5 hours [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq]; the MNI code says facilitators should explain the range of physiological and emotional experiences that may occur [source: MNI, Values and Ethics]. (3) Readiness screen [synthesis]: active psychosis, mania, dissociative identity disorder or severe dissociation, PTSD with active flashbacks, suicidal ideation, recent bereavement in the acute phase, a current crisis, substance misuse. If present, discuss postponing and the reasons. (4) Disclosure: the MNI code places responsibility for withheld information on the client, so encourage honest disclosure of mental-health history to the facilitator; the therapist contacts the facilitator only with written consent. [source: MNI, Values and Ethics] [synthesis] (5) Questions for the facilitator: MNI certification and directory listing; total costs (PLR, preliminary sessions, LBL), cancellation and refund terms, which the code says are declared in advance; what happens if the client becomes distressed; recording and consent; any other services offered, which MNI does not endorse; the complaint route. [source: MNI, Values and Ethics] (6) Suggestion inoculation: brief psychoeducation (4.4) and an agreement to treat content provisionally and to make no major decision (relationships, money, health, treatment) for an agreed period afterwards. [synthesis] (7) Medicines: the therapist gives no advice on starting, stopping or changing medicines; questions go to the prescriber. (8) Aftercare plan: someone the client can be with afterwards if unsettled, and a debrief appointment soon after (4.6). [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Before you go, let's be clear on what it can and can't tell you, check this is a steady time for something this intense, and book a time to talk it through afterwards."
  • Watch for: booking driven by crisis or acute grief; pressure or urgency from a facilitator; concealment of mental-health history; costs the client cannot afford. Working when the client goes in with realistic expectations and a plan, or chooses to wait.

4.6 Debriefing after a session

  • Purpose / when: At the first contact after an LBL or PLR session, and again if after-effects persist.
  • Steps: (1) State first: orientation, sleep, appetite, derealisation or depersonalisation, intrusive imagery, mood swings, elation, suicidal thoughts. (2) Narrative: let the client tell it at their pace, without interrogating details, since repeated detailed questioning can add to and harden the account (Otgaar et al. 2022 on repeated suggestion). (3) Affect and meaning: what moved them, what unsettled them (4.2). (4) "Messages" and instructions: identify any guidance about decisions (leaving a partner, changing work, contacting someone, stopping treatment), and apply the agreed pause on major decisions (4.5). (5) Recording: MNI facilitators give unaltered recordings [source: MNI, Values and Ethics]; if the client wants to share it, attend to their experience rather than to authenticating it, and note whether repeated replaying is soothing or compulsive. [synthesis] (6) Adverse effects: persistent dissociation, a persona that will not "leave" [source: UVA DOPS], or new trauma imagery go to 4.8 and 4.9. (7) Disappointment: if "nothing came," MNI links disappointing experiences with skipping the PLR [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq]; the therapist frames it as no failure of the client and watches for self-blame and repeat spending. [synthesis] (8) Agree next steps.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Before we get into what you saw, how have you been since: sleeping, feeling like yourself, feeling real?"
  • Watch for: symptoms lasting beyond a few days, grandiosity, sudden major decisions, new "memories" about living people. Working when the client is at baseline and can place the experience in the life they are living.

4.7 Grief and bereavement work

  • Purpose / when: When loss or death anxiety underlies the interest: clients may hope to meet a deceased person in the spirit world or to "transcend" the fear of death. [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq] [synthesis]
  • Steps: (1) Take a loss history: who, when, how, what is unfinished, other losses. (2) Ask what LBL is doing for the grief: comfort, permission, reassurance, avoidance. (3) Use a continued-bonds frame that does not need you to decide whether contact was literal: what the relationship still gives and asks. (4) Do grief work in its own right (narrative of the death, feelings of guilt and anger, adapting to life without the person) with standard evidence-based grief approaches; screen for prolonged grief and depression. [synthesis] (5) If the hoped-for reunion did not happen, or a "message" from the deceased was upsetting, treat it as part of the grief, not a verdict. (6) Watch for exploitation of bereaved people: repeat sessions, paid mediums or readers presented as the only route to the deceased (cross-refer XIV 094, 098 and 099 on mediumship). (7) Plan for anniversaries and triggers.
  • Example language (illustrative): "It sounds like the session let you feel close to her again. What has it been like to carry the loss the rest of the week?"
  • Watch for: searching behaviour channelled into paid sessions; inability to function months on; guilt reinforced by "life plan" ideas ("I chose this"); a wish to join the deceased (assess suicide risk directly). Working when grief can be felt and spoken outside the LBL frame.

4.8 Trauma "memories" arising: neutrality, no validation as fact

  • Purpose / when: When a session produces distressing imagery: a violent past-life death, a harsh "Council" review, or apparent memories of abuse in this life, sometimes naming real people. Cross-refer 113 and Domain VI 110.
  • Steps: (1) Stabilise first (4.9). (2) Take the distress seriously: intrusions, nightmares and avoidance are treated as real symptoms whatever their source. (3) Hold a neutral stance: neither confirm nor dismiss; say plainly that the therapist cannot know what happened and that hypnosis cannot settle it. [source: UVA DOPS; Davies et al. 1998] (4) Do no memory recovery: no hypnosis, guided imagery, dream work or repeated questioning to "get more" (Mollon, as summarised by Davies et al. 1998; Otgaar et al. 2022). (5) Do not encourage confrontation, accusation or cutting off family on the basis of session content; explore the client's own decision over time. [synthesis] (6) Safeguarding is based on present risk: if any source indicates current risk to a child or vulnerable adult, follow ordinary safeguarding duties. [synthesis] (7) Document neutrally ("client reports imagery during a hypnosis session of …") (4.16). (8) Treat symptoms with standard trauma-informed care that does not depend on verifying content, referring for specialist care when needed. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "What you saw is clearly affecting you, and we'll take that seriously. What neither of us can know from a hypnosis session is whether it happened, and I won't use methods that could blur that further."
  • Watch for: the client pressing you to confirm; new details appearing between sessions (stop any memory-focused work); family rupture; suicidality. Working when symptoms ease and the client can decide what to do without needing the content to be proven.

4.9 Grounding and stabilisation after a destabilising session

  • Purpose / when: Flooding, derealisation, depersonalisation, a "past-life" persona that seems to linger, insomnia or agitation after an LBL or PLR session.
  • Steps: (1) Orient to present time, place and body with simple grounding the client chooses (naming objects in the room, feeling feet on the floor, holding something cool), with no breath work beyond ordinary calm breathing. [synthesis] (2) Restore routine: sleep, meals, company, less stimulation. (3) Pause further trance practices, including self-hypnosis or guided-journey recordings, until stable. [synthesis] (4) Normalise without catastrophising: adverse events after altered-state practices are "not uncommon" in meditation research (Farias et al. 2020, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica; Lindahl et al. 2017, PLOS ONE), and Stevenson describes regressed personas that did not go away on request, leaving people altered for days [source: UVA DOPS]; applying these findings to LBL is extrapolation [synthesis]. (5) Review frequently until baseline. (6) Thresholds for urgent psychiatric assessment: psychotic symptoms, mania, dissociation persisting beyond a few days, suicidal ideation, inability to care for self (4.13). [synthesis] (7) Record the adverse effect (4.16) and, if the facilitator's conduct contributed, discuss complaint routes (4.15).
  • Example language (illustrative): "Right now the job is to help you feel solid and here again. We can make sense of the content once you're sleeping and feeling like yourself."
  • Watch for: worsening rather than settling over days; the client seeking another session to "finish" or "close" the experience while unstable; self-harm. Working when sleep, orientation and functioning return.

4.10 Dependency and costs

  • Purpose / when: Routinely, because sessions are long, privately priced and set by each facilitator. [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq]
  • Steps: (1) Draw up a cost ledger with the client: PLR, preliminary sessions, LBL, repeats, courses, books and add-on services (the MNI code says additional services are not MNI-endorsed and must be delivered separately) [source: MNI, Values and Ethics]. (2) Map decision-making: which ordinary choices are being deferred to "guidance" or to the next session. (3) Ask who recommends more sessions and what is promised; red flags are promised cure, guaranteed contact with the dead, urgency, bundle discounts and pressure to recruit others; the MNI code requires realistic claims [source: MNI, Values and Ethics]. (4) Distinguish one meaningful experience from escalating reliance. (5) Use a non-shaming, motivational stance: pros and cons in the client's terms, a budget limit the client sets. [synthesis] (6) Financial hardship goes to practical debt advice; suspected exploitation of a vulnerable adult goes to safeguarding. [synthesis] Stevenson opposed practitioners who charge fees for past-life recovery [source: UVA DOPS].
  • Example language (illustrative): "How are you deciding when you need another session, and what does each one cost you, in money and in time?"
  • Watch for: debt, secrecy about spending, decisions put off until the "next session," a facilitator positioned as indispensable. Working when the client makes present-life decisions autonomously and spending is within limits they chose.

4.11 Family concerns

  • Purpose / when: Relatives are distressed by the client's beliefs, spending or session-based accusations, or a worried relative is the one in therapy.
  • Steps: (1) Clarify consent and whose concern is being addressed. (2) With consent, use the CFI Informant Version for collateral history. [source: CFI supplementary modules] (3) Separate belief from behaviour: the belief is not the problem; specific concerns (spending, withdrawal, major decisions, risk) can be named. (4) Offer the family the same psychoeducation (4.4) and the signs that would warrant professional help (4.3). (5) Coach respectful communication: curiosity, no ridicule, ultimatums or coercive "rescue" attempts. [synthesis] (6) If session content has produced accusations against relatives (4.8), help them respond without counter-attack and keep contact open. [synthesis] (7) Attend to the relatives' own grief and fear.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You don't have to share her beliefs to stay close. What are the specific things you're worried about, apart from the beliefs themselves?"
  • Watch for: the therapist being recruited to one side; the family pathologising belief; escalating estrangement. Working when the family can talk about concrete concerns without fighting over the cosmology.

4.12 Children: not suitable

  • Purpose / when: A parent wants LBL or regression for a child, uses LBL ideas (an "old soul," a child who "chose" the family) to explain a child's difficulties, or a child is frightened by afterlife talk.
  • Steps: (1) State the clinical view plainly: hypnotic regression and LBL are not suitable for children. [synthesis] MNI's public pages state no age criteria [uncertain: not verified]. (2) If the parent cites reincarnation research, note that the University of Virginia's Division of Perceptual Studies, which studies children's spontaneous statements, has never used hypnotic regression to investigate cases. [source: UVA DOPS] (3) Behavioural, emotional or developmental concerns go to paediatric or developmental assessment (attention, autism, anxiety, trauma); a spiritual label never replaces assessment. (4) Use the CFI School-Age Children and Adolescents module with its parents' addendum. [source: CFI supplementary modules] (5) Seek consent from parents and assent from the child for any work. (6) If a child is exposed to trance procedures or frightening content, or needed care is refused, follow local safeguarding procedures. [synthesis] (7) With older adolescents, follow the applicable consent law and support them to wait. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I understand why this framework speaks to you. For him, though, I'd want a proper assessment of what's going on first, and I wouldn't recommend hypnosis for a child of any kind."
  • Watch for: delay to assessment, a child's nightmares or fears about death, a child taking on a parent's guilt or mission. Working when the child is assessed and protected from trance work.

4.13 Referral

  • Purpose / when: When clinical risk, medical need, specialist need or the client's wish to involve a spiritual community arises.
  • Steps: (1) Psychiatry: urgently for psychosis, mania, suicidal risk or persistent dissociation; routinely for diagnostic clarification. (2) Medical: physical symptoms being attributed to spiritual causes, or treatment being delayed. (3) Specialist grief, trauma or dissociation services. (4) Debt and financial advice. (5) With consent, a spiritual adviser or community member the client trusts. (6) Coordinate with consent, and keep your clinical opinion separate from spiritual authority. LBL facilitators are not a referral destination for treatment. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I'd like a psychiatrist to see you alongside our work. Not to take away anything that matters to you, but to be thorough."
  • Watch for: medical or psychiatric need described as a spiritual stage; reluctance to involve anyone outside the practice. [synthesis]

4.14 Boundaries: the therapist never performs LBL

  • Purpose / when: The client asks the therapist to regress them, "hold space" during self-hypnosis, interpret what a guide meant or channel a message; or the therapist is trained in hypnosis, PLR or LBL, or shares the client's beliefs.
  • Steps: (1) State the boundary at the first request. (2) No induction, regression, PLR, LBL, guided "spirit world" imagery, readings or interpretation of guide messages, ever, within therapy. (3) A therapist who is also a certified facilitator never offers LBL to therapy clients, does not refer clients to their own LBL practice, and keeps the two services separate; the MNI code itself requires non-LBL services to be kept separate from LBL [source: MNI, Values and Ethics], and the same logic applies in reverse [synthesis]. (4) Self-disclosure about your own beliefs is sparing and only in the client's interest. (5) Take role questions to supervision. (6) Document boundary conversations. [source: APA Ethics Code, multiple relationships] [uncertain: not verified] [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I don't do those sessions with anyone I'm seeing as a therapist. It would muddy what we're doing here, and this work needs to stay yours."
  • Watch for: role confusion, the client seeing you as guru or medium, subtle steering toward your own worldview, feeling hurt by the boundary (Section 5, rupture).

4.15 Consumer complaints routes

  • Purpose / when: The client feels misled, overcharged, pressured or harmed by a facilitator, or describes a boundary or sexual violation.
  • Steps: (1) Clarify the concern: fees and refunds, misleading claims, pressure, confidentiality, recordings or material shared without consent, sexual or boundary violation, harm. (2) Map it to the MNI code where relevant: costs declared in advance, realistic claims, confidentiality, consent to record and publish, fitness to practise. [source: MNI, Values and Ethics] (3) Set out the routes the client may choose: raising it with the facilitator if safe; the MNI complaint form, with a formal process overseen by the Director of Membership and an independent Ethics Panel (MNI says it is not responsible for facilitators' business practices, so the outcome concerns certification) [source: MNI, Values and Ethics]; other professional bodies or licensing boards the facilitator belongs to; the card issuer or payment provider for disputed charges; the consumer protection authority in the client's jurisdiction; the police for sexual assault, fraud or threats. [synthesis] (4) Help the client gather a timeline, receipts, advertising claims and messages. (5) The client decides; the therapist does not file on the client's behalf without consent, apart from the therapist's own mandatory duties such as safeguarding. (6) Work with the shame and betrayal the experience may bring.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You have options here, and none of them commits you to anything. Shall we write down what happened and what you were promised, so you can decide with a clear head?"
  • Watch for: self-blame ("I chose it"), retaliation fears, a complaint becoming the only focus. Working when the client feels they have choices and acts, or decides not to, on their own terms.

4.16 Documentation and coding

  • Purpose / when: Throughout, so records describe experiences and risks accurately without pathologising belief.
  • Steps: (1) Record the client's account in their words, attributed ("client reports that during a hypnosis session …"). (2) Avoid diagnostic labels for beliefs; diagnose only on clinical criteria. (3) Where the focus of care is the spiritual experience, consider ICD-10-CM Z65.8, under which "Religious or spiritual problem" is an inclusion term. [source: Unbound Medicine, ICD-10-CM Z65.8] (4) Record risk assessments, consent discussions, the boundary that no hypnosis was performed, adverse effects and referrals. (5) Share records, or contact a facilitator, only with consent. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): Note wording: "Client describes an LBL hypnosis session in which she experienced meeting a guide; she holds this as spiritually meaningful. No psychotic features. Focus of work: bereavement."
  • Watch for: notes that read session content as fact, or belief as symptom. Working when another clinician could read the note and neither dismiss the client nor take the content as history.

5. Handling problems

  • The client insists the memories are literally true and wants you to confirm it. Don't argue or endorse. Validate meaning and emotion, keep the literal question open, and redirect to present-life use: "I can see how real and important it felt; what I can help with is what it means for you now" (illustrative). If insistence becomes rigid and functioning drops, reassess for psychosis (4.3). [synthesis]
  • Overwhelm or destabilisation after a session (flooding, derealisation, a distressing "Council" review, a traumatic "past life"). Stabilise first (4.9), pause trance practices, screen for dissociation and psychosis, and treat the affect, not the cosmology. Regression "can overwhelm vulnerable people" [source: psi-encyclopedia], and regressed personas have persisted for days [source: UVA DOPS]. [synthesis]
  • Surfaced "memories" of abuse by a named real person. Do not confirm or act as if established; no memory-recovery or regression work; contain, assess present safety and explain reconstructive memory without judgement (4.4, 4.8). Cross-refer 113 and Domain VI 110. [source: Davies et al. 1998; Otgaar et al. 2022] [synthesis]
  • Stuck in the spirit-world narrative. When LBL material is used to avoid a present problem, name the pattern gently and re-contract on current-life goals: "We keep coming back to the session when the week gets hard. Shall we look at what's hard?" (illustrative) [synthesis]
  • Escalating paid sessions. Make the pattern explicit with the cost ledger (4.10), examine what is promised, and support autonomous decisions; if a facilitator or medium is positioned as the only route to a decision or to the deceased, name the exploitation risk. [synthesis]
  • Bereaved client using LBL instead of mourning. Move toward direct grief work while respecting the comfort the experience gave (4.7); watch for prolonged grief and searching funnelled into sessions. [synthesis]
  • Rupture when you won't perform or validate. Repair by distinguishing roles and affirming the relationship: "My not doing that isn't me dismissing you; it's me staying useful as your therapist" (illustrative). [synthesis]
  • A facilitator's view conflicts with the therapy (for example, a recommendation of more sessions or a different interpretation). With consent, clarify roles in writing; do not debate the cosmology; keep the client's goals central. [synthesis]
  • "Guidance" to stop medication or treatment. Give no advice on medicines; explore the decision, encourage the client to speak with the prescriber before any change, and inform the prescriber with consent if risk is high. [synthesis]
  • A client with dissociative identity disorder, psychosis or bipolar disorder wants LBL. Share your concerns about deep trance for them, suggest postponing, and coordinate with the treating psychiatrist; respect the decision of a client with capacity while planning aftercare (4.5, 4.6). [synthesis]
  • Longing for the spirit world as "home." Ask directly about suicidal thoughts, intent and plans; follow standard risk assessment, safety planning and urgent pathways; discuss the longing without romanticising death. [synthesis]
  • "Nothing came" and the client feels a failure. Normalise; MNI links disappointing experiences with skipping the PLR [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq]; explore what the client hoped for (often a loss or a fear) and watch for repeat spending to "get it right." [synthesis]
  • Family conflict escalates. Hold a non-partisan stance, separate belief from concrete concerns, and offer a joint meeting with consent (4.11). [synthesis]
  • A child is involved. Follow 4.12: no regression for children, developmental assessment, consent and assent, safeguarding. [synthesis]
  • Problems the sources do not address. MNI's public FAQ and Code of Ethics set no mental-health screening criteria, exclusions, referral duties or guidance for post-session distress [source: newtoninstitute.org/lbl-faq; MNI, Values and Ethics]. The screening, contraindication, aftercare, dependency and complaints guidance in this guide is clinical synthesis grounded in standard assessment, the memory research cited and the companion guides (113, 115, Domain VI 110), not LBL source material. [synthesis]

Sources

← Previous · XIV-113Past-life regressionNext · XIV-115 →Quantum Healing Hypnosis Technique (Cannon)