Bibliomancy and the sortes

1. Introduction

Version followed: bibliomancy and the sortes as late-antique scholarship documents them (Luijendijk and Klingshirn, eds., My Lots Are in Thy Hands, Brill 2018; van der Horst 2002), the Persian and Islamic fāl tradition as Iraj Afshar describes it in Encyclopaedia Iranica, and current practice as reporting describes it. There is no founder, governing body, standard guidebook or training school: this is a family of practices, not a therapy. The clinical procedures below are the psychotherapist's work with a client who brings the practice; where no published clinical source exists they are marked [synthesis].

What it is. Bibliomancy is divination by opening an authoritative book at random and taking the passage that appears as an answer to a question held in mind [source: Afshar, Iranica "Fāl-nāma"; Sanzo, BMCR 2019.09.47]. Named historical forms include:

Sortes Homericae and sortes Vergilianae (Homer, Virgil). The Historia Augusta uses the phrase "Vergilianas sortes" in its Life of Hadrian (2.8). Scholars disagree whether this reflects a real late-antique practice or a literary invention: Hamilton and Katz argue it appears nowhere else until the Renaissance; a 2015 CAMWS paper argues it reflects real belief in Virgil's infallibility [source: CAMWS 2015 abstract]. In seventeenth-century England readers pushed a pin through a closed copy of Virgil and read the pierced line as prophetic ("pricking in Virgil"); John Aubrey reports such a consultation in December 1648, during Charles I's imprisonment [source: Smyth, TEXT!, citing Aubrey and Usher 2015].
Sortes biblicae (Christian). Augustine's account of opening the Bible at random to Romans 13:13–14 (Confessions 8) is the classic example. Klingshirn argues that the early Augustine believed God could reveal knowledge through such instrumental divination. Manuscripts of John's Gospel carried Greek hermēneiai (oracular glosses) as an aid to bibliomancy; Syriac pushshāqē served a similar purpose; lot books such as the Sortes Astrampsychi and the later Sortes Sanctorum circulated; and some church leaders condemned sortes as unchristian [source: Sanzo, BMCR 2019.09.47, reviewing chapters by Klingshirn, Wilkinson, Childers and Luijendijk].
Sortes biblicae Judaicae. Van der Horst dates Jewish bibliomancy to the third to sixth centuries CE and argues it developed independently. In an earlier essay he argued that 1 Maccabees 3:48 shows a Torah scroll consulted as an oracle; a reviewer judged that reading unconvincing [source: Sanzo, BMCR 2019; Kraus, BMCR 2004.02.17]. Chabad-Lubavitch institutions describe a related custom: when facing a dilemma, a person may open one of the published volumes of the Lubavitcher Rebbe's letters (Igrot Kodesh) seeking Divine advice, a custom they say must be followed carefully "with proper guidance of Halacha" [source: Chabad Lubavitch of Alberta, "Ask for a Blessing"]; see 4.13.
Islamic and Persian fāl. A fāl-nāma is a book of omens; in its narrow sense, a text used for bibliomancy, consulted directly or through a fortune-teller. Religious opinion distinguishes estekhāra (istikhāra: seeking God's guidance on a specific matter, generally regarded as licit) from tafaʾʾol (taking omens from the Qurʾān, generally disapproved), though Afshar notes the line is often blurred. Bibliomancy with the Dīvān of Hafez (called "the Tongue of the Unseen") is the best-known Persian form [source: Afshar, Iranica]. Safavid-era fal-i Qurʾān included divination tables. Wahhabi and Deobandi groups condemn such practices; some Shia communities (including Bohras and Twelvers) and some Sufi movements have treated bibliomancy as a legitimate religious exercise [source: Khanbhai, Impart 2026].

Current practice. In Iran, fāl-e Hafez continues: fortune-tellers at Hafez's tomb in Shiraz open the Dīvān at random and explain a verse, or have parakeets pick an envelope holding a verse; some senior clerics disapprove [source: Kuwait Times, 2024; Afshar, Iranica]. Printed and digital fal-i Qurʾān remain available, and much current use is domestic or recreational [source: Khanbhai, Impart]. In the West, informal "Bible-dipping" and random-verse apps are in use; how widespread they are is [uncertain].

Core idea of how it works, as practitioners hold it. Providence, God, or the text's own authority guides the hand to the passage the questioner needs; the passage is read as favourable, unfavourable or in between [source: Afshar; Khanbhai]. Luijendijk's chapter title, "Only Do Not Be of Two Minds", points to a theme clinicians will recognise: these practices were bound up with doubt and with how much faith the questioner had to bring to the answer [source: Sanzo, BMCR 2019].

Evidence status (one line). There is no body of controlled research or systematic review testing the predictive claims of bibliomancy; its predictive value is unestablished [uncertain: not verified].

The therapist's task, in brief. The therapist does not perform bibliomancy. The tasks are to understand what the practice means in the client's tradition; to use a passage the client brings as reflective material if the client wishes; to notice when the practice has taken over decisions or become a scrupulosity or reassurance compulsion; and to protect clients from exploitation by paid readers [synthesis].

2. Framework

Bibliomancy has no therapeutic phases of its own. Below is a clinical sequence for a client who brings the practice into therapy [synthesis]. No source gives session counts. The work usually runs alongside the client's main treatment, not as a separate course.

Phase	Goal	Format	Move on when
A. Noticing and inviting	Learn that the client consults a book this way, without judgement	Within ordinary sessions	The client has described the practice in their own words
B. Meaning and cultural assessment	Learn the tradition, text, community norms and personal meaning (Cultural Formulation Interview, supplementary module 5: Spirituality, Religion, and Moral Traditions) [source: APA, CFI Supplementary Modules]	Part of one or more sessions	You know whether it is devotional, reflective, recreational or decision-delegating
C. Functional assessment	Separate reflective use from decision delegation, reassurance-seeking or compulsion; screen for risk (psychosis, mania, suicidality after an ominous verse, exploitation)	Structured questions; optional self-monitoring log	A working formulation of the function exists
D. Targeted work	Reflective use: work with the passage like other symbolic material. Decision delegation: decision support. Compulsion: ERP with faith-sensitive exposures [source: IOCDF]. Exploitation: consumer protection routes	Sessions plus between-session tasks	Function-specific goals are met, or a referral is made
E. Review and relapse planning	Keep the practice where the client wants it in their life	Brief check-ins	The client can describe early warning signs

Criteria for moving on are the client's description and your formulation, not any change in the client's belief. Belief change is not a goal [synthesis].

3. Guiding principles

Attribute; do not adjudicate. Describe what the client's tradition holds about how the passage is chosen. Meaning: say "in your tradition the verse is understood as...", never "the book told you" or "it's just chance" [synthesis].
Respect living traditions and their internal distinctions. For many Muslims istikhāra is legitimate prayer for guidance, and Iranian families may treat fāl-e Hafez as heritage or a festive custom [source: Afshar; Kuwait Times]. Meaning: ask which practice it is and how the client's community regards it before forming any view.
Religious authority belongs to the community. Whether a form of consultation is permitted is a question for the client and their clergy, not the therapist. IOCDF guidance recommends that clients with scrupulosity identify a trusted religious leader who understands OCD or will learn about it [source: IOCDF, "Principles of Effective and Religiously-Sensitive Exposures"]. Meaning: offer, with consent, to work alongside the client's imam, priest, rabbi or elder.
Function over content. The same act can be devotion, play, reflection, a way of handing off a decision, or an OCD compulsion. Meaning: assess what the consultation does for the client and what it costs them.
The client's book, the client's reading. Meaning: the therapist never opens the book, picks a verse, or interprets an omen for the client, and does not offer a counter-reading as an authority [synthesis].
Decisions stay with the client. Meaning: where a passage is driving a major decision (marriage, medical care, money, moving, leaving treatment), slow the decision down and widen the information base without contesting the faith behind it [synthesis].
Uncertainty tolerance is the clinical target in compulsive use. IOCDF guidance teaches trusting through uncertainty rather than chasing certainty [source: IOCDF]. Meaning: the aim is less need for an answer, not a better answer.
Normal religious practice stays available. IOCDF guidance says clients need not give up core beliefs, worship or prayer; they follow their faith's actual teaching rather than OCD's version of it [source: IOCDF]. Meaning: ERP never asks a client to stop devotional practice that their community regards as normal.
Protect from exploitation. Meaning: ask about payments to readers, curse claims and escalating fees [source: WA Consumer Protection].
Do not pathologise belief; do assess. Meaning: unusual conviction about a verse is not psychosis in itself. Look for idiosyncratic, non-shared meaning, ideas of reference that spread beyond the practice, and functional decline [synthesis].
Keep roles separate. A therapist who reads Hafez or uses bibliomancy privately keeps that outside therapy and does not disclose it to steer the client [synthesis].

4. Intervention inventory

No published psychotherapy protocol for bibliomancy is cited here [uncertain: not verified]. Interventions 4.1–4.18 are clinical procedures adapted to this practice; each is marked by source. Example language is illustrative throughout.

4.1 Eliciting the practice and its meaning

Purpose / when: At first mention of "opening the Bible/Qur'an/Hafez for an answer", a verse that "came to me", or a decision "the book made" [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Thank the client for telling you; signal that you will not dismiss it. (2) Ask which text, how they consult it (prayer first? a question held in mind? a fortune-teller? an app?), how often, since when, and who taught them. (3) Ask what the practice means in their family and community, and how their clergy regard it (for example istikhāra versus omen-taking). (4) Use the Cultural Formulation Interview's questions on spirituality, religion and moral traditions to place the practice in context. Supplementary module 5 (Spirituality, Religion, and Moral Traditions) covers belonging to traditions, their role in daily, family and communal life, whether practices, teachings or leaders have helped with the problem or contributed to it, and distress or conflict related to religious identity; clinicians may reproduce it for use with their patients [source: APA, CFI Supplementary Modules]. (5) Write down the client's own terms and use them.
Example language (illustrative): "You mentioned opening the Dīvān before deciding. Could you walk me through how you do that and what it means to you?" / "In your community, is this seen as prayer, as tradition, as something lighter, or as something people disagree about?"
Watch for / working when: Guardedness, or fear that you will mock or forbid the practice; slow down if you see it. It is working when the client describes the practice openly and in detail.

4.2 Functional assessment: reflection, delegation or compulsion

Purpose / when: Once the practice is known, to decide whether there is anything clinical to address [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Map recent consultations: trigger, question, passage, interpretation, action taken, feeling afterwards. (2) Ask about frequency and escalation ("once at Nowruz" versus "many times a day"), repeat consultations on the same question, and distress when unable to consult. (3) Ask who decides when passages conflict, and whether the client re-opens the book until the answer feels right. (4) Ask about costs: time, money paid to readers, decisions avoided or reversed, family conflict. (5) Sort the function: devotional/cultural (shared, bounded, little distress) / reflective (prompts thinking, client keeps the decision) / delegating (passage substitutes for the client's judgement on high-stakes matters) / compulsive (driven by anxiety or doubt, repeated, brings short relief then more doubt; consider scrupulosity or OCD) / exploited (a paid reader escalates fees or curse claims). Several can apply at once.
Example language (illustrative): "When you open the book and the verse feels unclear, what happens next?" / "How do you feel an hour after a consultation: settled, or wanting to check again?"
Watch for: Re-opening until the answer feels right, a need for certainty, and private rules about "valid" openings point toward OCD. IOCDF lists repeated reassurance-seeking from religious leaders, loved ones or God, and mental repetition of scripture, among scrupulosity compulsions [source: IOCDF, "What is OCD & Scrupulosity?"]. Sign-seeking by opening a text is not named in that list; treating it as a compulsion when it functions as one is [synthesis].

4.3 Working with a passage the client brings as reflective material

Purpose / when: When the client wants to explore what a verse stirred in them and the use is not compulsive. Jungian authors treat meaningful-coincidence experiences as symbolic material to be interpreted like dreams and images [source: Roesler, "Investigating Synchronistic Events in Psychotherapy", citing Fordham, Main and Hopcke]. Marie-Louise von Franz's On Divination and Synchronicity (1980) reads divination methods psychologically [source: von Franz 1980, book description]; neither source describes bibliomancy specifically [uncertain: not verified].
Steps: (1) Ask the client to read the passage aloud or paraphrase it; do not supply an interpretation. (2) Ask what the question was and what they hoped and feared the answer would be. (3) Explore which words landed, what images and memories came, and whose voice it resembles. (4) Reflect themes back as the client's ("you heard 'patience' as reproach"). (5) Ask what the client wants to do with what came up, separate from the verse. (6) If the client wishes, note links to the formulation; leave the theological meaning to the client and their tradition.
Example language (illustrative): "Before we look at what the verse means, what were you hoping it would say?" / "Of everything in that ghazal, which line stayed with you, and why that one?"
Watch for / working when: A passage read as a verdict on the client's worth (shame) or as fixed fate (hopelessness). Watch for the client asking you to confirm the meaning, which turns the work into reassurance. It is working when the client produces their own meanings and links them to choices they control.

4.4 Decision support when a passage is steering a major choice

Purpose / when: A passage is about to decide marriage, divorce, medical care, money, migration, or whether to continue therapy [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Name the decision and the timeline. (2) Ask how the tradition itself treats such guidance: many traditions pair consultation with counsel, prayer and practical inquiry. Ask, without asserting, whether the client's clergy would expect them also to seek advice. (3) Build a parallel information base: options, consequences, values, the people affected. (4) Agree a pause before irreversible steps. (5) Where health is involved, route the medical decision to the client's doctor; the therapist does not advise on medicines or treatment. (6) Revisit after the decision for meaning-making either way.
Example language (illustrative): "The verse matters to you, and so does this decision. Could we look at it from every angle you would want, including the verse, before anything becomes final?"
Watch for: Family members using a consultation to pressure the client (for example over marriage), and the client using the verse to avoid the anxiety of choosing. It is working when the client can state their own reasons alongside the passage.

4.5 Separating legitimate practice from OCD, with a trusted religious leader

Purpose / when: The client is unsure whether their consulting is faith or OCD, or ERP is planned around religious material.
Steps: (1) Ask the client to identify a trusted leader (imam, priest, rabbi, elder) who understands OCD or will learn about it. (2) With written consent, share only what the client approves. (3) Ask the leader to describe what is normative in the community. IOCDF guidance proposes an "85% rule": if 85% or more of a faith community does something, it is treated as normative. (4) Agree that the client keeps the community's ordinary practices while dropping the OCD additions (for example repeated re-opening, private rules of validity) [source: IOCDF, "Principles of Effective and Religiously-Sensitive Exposures"].
Example language (illustrative): "I'm not the right person to say what your faith permits. Would it help to ask someone you trust there, so we can tell your faith apart from the OCD?"
Watch for: The client using the leader for repeated reassurance; agree on a single consultation question in advance. The client may feel your referral is a judgement on their faith; explain why you are suggesting it.

4.6 ERP for compulsive consulting and sign-seeking (scrupulosity or OCD)

Purpose / when: The functional assessment shows repeated, anxiety-driven consulting: re-opening until the answer feels right, consulting on trivial choices, or distress when unable to consult. IOCDF names ERP, delivered within CBT, as the primary psychological treatment for all OCD subtypes, including scrupulosity [source: IOCDF, "What is OCD & Scrupulosity?"]. Refer to an OCD-trained clinician if you are not one.
Steps: (1) Psychoeducation: OCD seeks certainty, and each consultation brings brief relief and then more doubt. (2) Build a hierarchy from monitoring data: for example, choosing lunch without consulting, then a work decision, then leaving an "unclear" verse uninterpreted, then not re-opening after an "unfavourable" passage. (3) Response prevention, built up gradually. IOCDF guidance suggests delaying the urge to seek an answer (its example is 30 minutes) and reducing the number of people contacted for reassurance; apply the same to re-opening the text [source: IOCDF, "Principles"; the application to bibliomancy is synthesis]. (4) Exposures to doubt, guilt and uncertainty without neutralising, including imaginal exposure such as loop recordings of feared scenarios [source: IOCDF, "Principles"]. (5) Keep normative practice: IOCDF guidance does not require giving up prayer, worship or core beliefs, and does not require exposures to forbidden acts such as destroying scripture [source: IOCDF]. Agree with the client and their trusted leader whether a bounded consultation (such as an istikhāra the community regards as normal, done once) stays in [synthesis]. (6) Review hierarchy progress each session.
Consent and safety: Explain the rationale, the expected rise in anxiety and the client's right to pause; agree each exposure in advance; never design an exposure that violates the client's faith; screen first for psychosis, active suicidality and severe depression, and adapt or postpone if they are present [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "This week, when the urge to open the book comes, see if you can wait thirty minutes and notice what the doubt does." / "We're not asking you to stop praying, only to stop letting OCD write extra rules on top of your prayer."
Watch for / working when: Covert substitutes (mental verse-picking, random-verse apps, asking others to open the book) and reassurance-seeking from the therapist. It is working when frequency falls, the client tolerates an unanswered question, and distress after an "unclear" passage passes without checking.

4.7 Distress after an ominous passage

Purpose / when: The client has drawn a verse they read as foretelling death, illness, punishment or failure. The historical record shows this reaction: Charles I is reported to have been troubled by drawing Dido's curse [uncertain: secondary, unverified].
Steps: (1) Assess risk: hopelessness, suicidal thoughts, plans to act on the omen, or stopping medical care. Follow standard suicide risk assessment and safety planning [synthesis]. (2) Validate the fear without confirming the prediction. (3) Ask how the tradition handles unfavourable outcomes; illustrated fāl-nāma texts reminded seekers to be prayerful, to be good to their neighbours or to go on pilgrimage [source: Smithsonian Magazine 2009]; the client's clergy can say what is expected of them. (4) Separate the passage from the client's present choices. (5) If repeated checking follows, move to 4.6.
Example language (illustrative): "That verse frightened you. Before anything else, I'd like to check how you are and whether you've had thoughts of harming yourself." / "What does your tradition say a person should do when the answer seems dark?"
Watch for: Fatalism, health decisions made on the omen, and a self-fulfilling withdrawal from life. It is working when fear falls and ordinary functioning resumes.

4.8 Grief and bibliomancy

Purpose / when: A bereaved client consults a text for messages from or about the person who died. Hill (2011), cited by Roesler, reports that synchronistic experiences in mourning can help with grief [source: Roesler, citing Hill 2011].
Steps: (1) Let the client say what the passage meant for the relationship. (2) Work with it as continuing-bond material within ordinary grief work [synthesis]. (3) Ask whether anyone charges them for "messages" (see 4.9). (4) Watch for complicated grief and depression, and refer if needed.
Example language (illustrative): "When you read that line, what did it feel like it was saying from her to you?"
Watch for: Compulsive consulting to keep contact, escalating payments to readers, and avoiding the reality of the loss. It is working when the passage comforts without crowding out mourning.

4.9 Paid readers, costs and exploitation

Purpose / when: The client pays a fortune-teller, falgir or online reader, or describes curse talk and rising fees.
Steps: (1) Ask neutrally about payments, frequency and any "danger", "bad luck" or "curse" message. (2) Name the warning signs regulators describe: a low-cost first reading followed by demands for hundreds of dollars to remove a curse; claims that the curse persists and needs more payment or costly ceremonies; pressure to attend more sessions; unusual requests [source: WA Consumer Protection, "Beware the misfortune tellers"]. (3) Help the client set a budget or stop. (4) Point to consumer routes: in Western Australia, WA ScamNet [source: WA Consumer Protection]; in the UK the Fraudulent Mediums Act 1951 was repealed in 2008 and spiritualist services were brought under consumer-protection rules [source: Humanists UK press release, 10 April 2008]; the regulations' name and Trading Standards enforcement are [uncertain: not verified]; in the US, the FTC takes reports of scams, frauds and bad business practices at ReportFraud.ftc.gov, whether or not money was lost [source: FTC press release, 22 October 2020]; state attorney-general and police routes are [uncertain: not verified]. (5) Address the shame of having been deceived.
Example language (illustrative): "Some readers tell people they're cursed and then charge more and more to lift it. Has anything like that happened to you?"
Watch for: Grief, loneliness and crisis as vulnerabilities; secrecy from family; debt. It is working when spending stops and the client can describe the pattern.

4.10 Differential assessment without pathologising belief

Purpose / when: Passages seem to carry personal messages beyond what the tradition holds, or the client's experience is changing quickly [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Compare the client's account with the shared practice: is the meaning one their community would recognise? (2) Ask about ideas of reference outside the text (television, strangers, number plates), voices, grandiosity, a reduced need for sleep and racing thoughts. (3) Consider OCD (4.6), mania, psychosis, complicated grief and the DSM-5-TR category "Religious or Spiritual Problem" (ICD-10-CM Z65.8, Other specified problems related to psychosocial circumstances, which includes 'Religious or spiritual problem' [source: Unbound Medicine, ICD-10-CM Z65.8]; DSM-5-TR wording [uncertain: not verified]). (4) Refer for psychiatric assessment where psychosis or mania is likely, keeping the client's faith respected in the referral.
Example language (illustrative): "When you open the book, do the verses feel meant for you in the way your family would understand, or in a different, more personal way?"
Watch for: Over-reading ordinary devotion as illness, and under-reading a first episode as "just religion".

4.11 Requests that the therapist open the book or interpret

Purpose / when: The client asks you to pick a verse, consult on their behalf, or say what an omen means [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Decline warmly. (2) Explain that the meaning belongs to the client and their tradition, and that answering would make you an authority you are not. (3) Turn to 4.3 or 4.6, depending on the function. (4) If you practise bibliomancy or reading privately, keep it out of therapy and do not self-disclose it to steer the client.
Example language (illustrative): "I'd rather not choose a verse for you. It's your book and your question, but I'd be glad to think with you about what you find."
Watch for: The request as reassurance-seeking in disguise, and the client feeling rejected; repair if so.

4.12 Family, children and high-stakes pressure

Purpose / when: Family members use consultations to decide for an adult client (marriage, leaving home) or for a child (schooling, medical care) [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Explore the family's practice respectfully. (2) Support the adult client's own voice in the decision. (3) Where a child's medical care or safety is being decided by divination in place of care, follow local safeguarding procedures and refer for proper assessment; involve the parents in respectful dialogue where safe. (4) Seek consent and, for children, assent.
Example language (illustrative): "It sounds like the verse is carrying a lot of your family's hopes. What do you want, alongside what they hope?"
Watch for: Coercion, cultural misreading, and safeguarding thresholds being met.

4.13 Writing to the Rebbe and opening Igrot Kodesh (Chabad-Lubavitch clients)

Purpose / when: A Chabad-Lubavitch client, or a client close to a Chabad community, mentions writing to the Rebbe or opening a volume of his letters before a decision. Chabad institutions present letters to the Rebbe as continuing "written prayer petitions", which may be written in any language; Ohel Chabad-Lubavitch asks writers to give the name and mother's name of each person the letter concerns (the Hebrew name preferred) and places letters at the Ohel shortly after they arrive [source: Chabad Lubavitch of Alberta, "Ask for a Blessing"; Ohel Chabad-Lubavitch, "How to Send a Letter"]. Chabad of Alberta also describes a tradition, which it links to the Shulchan Aruch, of opening one of the published volumes of the Rebbe's letters when facing a dilemma, and says this must be done carefully and with proper halachic guidance [source: Chabad Lubavitch of Alberta]. How individual rabbis guide the custom, and how it is regarded outside Chabad, varies [uncertain: not verified].
Steps: (1) Ask the client to describe the practice as they do it and as their community teaches it, and use their words. (2) Ask who guides them in it. Chabad institutions stress halachic guidance, and Chabad of Alberta invites people to contact its rabbi and rebbetzin personally [source: Chabad Lubavitch of Alberta]; ask whether the client has a rabbi or other spiritual mentor they trust. (3) Apply the functional assessment (4.2). A letter written before a major decision, as the community teaches, differs from re-opening volumes until a passage feels right, or opening them over trivial choices with mounting distress. (4) If a passage is steering a major choice, use 4.4; medical decisions stay with the client's doctor. (5) Where compulsive features appear, involve the client's rabbi with consent to describe what is normative (4.5), then plan ERP (4.6) that keeps the custom as the rabbi describes it. (6) Do not open a volume, write on the client's behalf or interpret a letter (4.11). (7) Some clients read the letters as counsel rather than as an oracle: Kehot has begun an English series of the letters, and Chabad.org reports research on their psychological guidance [source: Rubin, Chabad.org News, 18 June 2026]. Work with such reading as reflective material (4.3).
Example language (illustrative): "When you write to the Rebbe and open a volume, what are you hoping to find, and who helps you understand what you read?" / "Your community says this should be done with proper guidance. Would it help to ask your rabbi what is usual, so we can tell your practice apart from the doubt?"
Watch for: Any dismissive tone about the Rebbe or the custom, which will close the conversation; treating ordinary devotion as a symptom; and the opposite error of missing OCD because the practice is respected. It is working when the client describes the practice openly and keeps it within the bounds their own rabbi describes.

4.14 Istikhāra: prayer for guidance and the search for signs (Muslim clients)

Purpose / when: A Muslim client prays istikhāra before a decision, asks someone to pray it for them, or worries whether their way of seeking guidance is permitted. In Sahih al-Bukhari 1166, Jabir ibn Abdullah reports that the Prophet taught istikhāra for every matter: two voluntary rakʿas followed by a supplication asking God for guidance on the matter; the text of the supplication is not reproduced here [source: Sunnah.com, Sahih al-Bukhari 1166]. Religious opinion generally treats istikhāra as licit and taking omens from the Qurʾān (tafaʾʾol) as disapproved, though the line is often blurred [source: Afshar, Iranica].
Steps: (1) Ask which form the client uses (the prayer itself, a relative or scholar praying on their behalf, opening the Qurʾān, attention to dreams or feelings afterwards) and how their community understands what follows. How a result is recognised is a question for the client and their scholars, not the therapist [synthesis]. (2) Place it within the client's wider decision process: consulting people, gathering information, weighing options (4.4). (3) Assess function (4.2). Repeated istikhāra on the same matter, inability to act without an unmistakable sign, or distress over whether the prayer was done correctly suggests OCD, which Islamic literature often calls waswasa [source: HBKU record of Keshavarzi et al. 2023]. (4) A clinician quoted in an NOCD article that IOCDF republished describes ERP as removing the rules OCD adds to faith, notes that Islam allows a person to "go with what you know and leave the doubt", and warns that ERP must never ask a client to violate their beliefs [source: Surles, NOCD, via IOCDF]. Build exposures accordingly (4.6). (5) With consent, involve an imam, sheikh or sheikha who understands OCD or will learn about it (4.5). (6) For clients who prefer an Islamic framework, Keshavarzi and colleagues' Islamic Workbook for Religious OCD (Waswasa) (2023) is based on Traditional Islamically Integrated Psychotherapy [source: HBKU record]; whether it addresses istikhāra is [uncertain: not verified].
Example language (illustrative): "After you pray istikhāra, how do you usually come to know what to do?" / "Your faith gives you a way to leave the doubt. What makes it hard to leave it this time?"
Watch for: Sign-checking after the prayer (re-reading dreams, moods or events) as the compulsion; the therapist ruling on whether a result is valid; family pressure on marriage expressed through istikhāra (4.12). It is working when the client prays as their tradition teaches, once, and then acts without repeating it.

4.15 Guilt and scrupulosity about consulting itself

Purpose / when: The client fears that consulting a book this way was sinful (forbidden divination, misuse of scripture), or that they misread or disrespected the text, and cannot stop confessing, repenting or asking for reassurance. Condemnation within traditions is documented: some early church leaders condemned sortes as unchristian [source: Sanzo, BMCR 2019]; Wahhabi and Deobandi groups condemn fāl practices [source: Khanbhai, Impart]; some senior clerics disapprove of fāl-e Hafez [source: Kuwait Times]. IOCDF lists repeated reassurance-seeking from religious leaders, loved ones or God among scrupulosity compulsions [source: IOCDF, "What is OCD & Scrupulosity?"].
Steps: (1) Separate the moral question from the OCD pattern. One question to the client's clergy about what their tradition teaches is ordinary religious life; repeated asking, confessing or mental reviewing in search of certainty functions as a compulsion [synthesis, drawing on IOCDF]. (2) Help the client obtain the tradition's actual answer once, from a trusted leader if they wish (4.5), and write it down. (3) ERP targets: no further reassurance-seeking after the agreed answer; imaginal exposure to the feared thought (for example, "perhaps I did wrong and will never know for sure") without neutralising [source: IOCDF, "Principles"]. (4) Never design exposures that disrespect scripture; IOCDF guidance does not require exposures to forbidden acts such as destroying scripture [source: IOCDF]. (5) Track guilt (0–10) and reassurance frequency each week.
Example language (illustrative): "You asked your priest and he answered you. When the doubt returns, what would it be like to let his answer stand without checking again?"
Watch for: The therapist being drawn into giving theological reassurance; avoidance of all devotional reading out of fear, which is itself a target, since ordinary reading of scripture stays available. It is working when guilt passes without confession rituals and the client can read their text again.

4.16 Random-verse apps, online readers and covert consulting

Purpose / when: The client uses apps, websites, social media or messaging to get a random verse, a fāl-e Hafez or a "message", or pays an online reader. Printed and digital fal-i Qurʾān remain available [source: Khanbhai, Impart]; Western random-verse apps also exist [uncertain: extent of use]. A phone removes the natural limits of opening a physical book, so consulting can multiply unnoticed [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Ask specifically about each route: apps, websites, accounts followed, asking relatives to open the book, and mental verse-picking. (2) Invite the client to review their own usage for a week (the phone's screen-time record where available), without judgement. (3) If the function is compulsive, put digital routes into the ERP hierarchy (4.6) beside the physical book; deleting apps or changing notifications is a response-prevention step the client chooses, not one the therapist imposes [synthesis]. (4) For paid online readers, use 4.9; in the US, scams and bad business practices can be reported at ReportFraud.ftc.gov whether or not money was lost [source: FTC press release, 22 October 2020]. (5) Distinguish a scheduled devotional reading (a daily verse) from on-demand answer-seeking, and leave the first alone if the client values it [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Some people find the app is quicker than the book and end up checking far more often. Is that true for you?"
Watch for: Hidden checking that undoes ERP; shame about the amount of use; over-reach into banning devotional apps. It is working when on-demand consultations fall in the client's own log while devotional use continues as they wish.

4.17 Building the client's own decision process: intolerance of uncertainty

Purpose / when: Chronic indecision in which consulting the book is a way out of not knowing, outside a clear OCD picture (for example, generalised worry). Intolerance of uncertainty is described as a transdiagnostic, trait-like disposition built on catastrophic beliefs about uncertainty; in Dugas and colleagues' cognitive-behavioural model it fuels worry, and safety behaviours such as reassurance-seeking and information-gathering reduce tolerance of uncertainty and keep the cycle going [source: Whalley, Psychology Tools 2020, citing Dugas et al. 1998, Dugas and Ladouceur 2000, and Hebert and Dugas 2019]. The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (Freeston et al. 1994) may be used as a prompt for beliefs; it is a published instrument and its items are not reproduced here [source: Whalley].
Steps: (1) Identify the client's beliefs about uncertainty (for example, "if I choose without a sign, it will go wrong") and rate conviction 0–100. (2) Design a behavioural experiment that drops the safety behaviour. Whalley's example compares three days of usual reassurance-seeking with three days without it [source: Whalley]; here, the client makes several low-stakes decisions with consulting and several without, recording outcome and distress [synthesis]. (3) Carry it out between sessions. (4) Review what the results mean for the belief, then re-rate conviction. (5) Alongside, build the client's own decision steps: options, likely consequences, values, the people affected (as in 4.4) [synthesis]. (6) If the client wishes, the passage stays available as one input to reflect on (4.3), not as the decider.
Example language (illustrative): "What do you predict will happen if you choose this weekend's plans without opening the book? Let's write the prediction down and check it next week."
Watch for: Experiments with too much at stake; covert checking; the experiment being heard as a test of the client's faith. It tests beliefs about uncertainty, not the tradition, and saying so helps. It is working when conviction in the catastrophic belief falls and routine decisions are made without consulting.

4.18 Relapse prevention, review and ending

Purpose / when: Phase E, once function-specific goals are met or the work is ending for other reasons.
Steps: (1) Review with the client where the practice now sits in their life and where they want it. The aim is the place the client chooses, not abandonment of the practice [synthesis]. (2) Name early warning signs from their monitoring: rising frequency, re-opening, consulting over trivial choices, secrecy, new payments to readers. (3) Name high-risk periods: major decisions (marriage, moves, illness), bereavements and anniversaries, and festive occasions when consultation is customary [synthesis]. (4) Write a short plan: the delay rule, one agreed contact with the trusted leader, and a return to behavioural experiments. Whalley suggests comparing old and new behaviours, planning for setbacks and continuing to choose uncertain paths deliberately [source: Whalley, Psychology Tools 2020]. (5) Agree how the client can return for a booster. (6) If the client has stepped back from a community or custom, attend to loss and identity before ending [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "If the urge to keep opening the book came back a year from now, what would be the first sign, and what would you do?"
Watch for: An ending that sounds like the therapist approving or disapproving of the practice; a lapse treated as failure rather than information. It is working when the client can state their warning signs and plan in their own words.

5. Handling problems

Except where a source is named, the guidance below is [synthesis].

The client fears you will forbid or mock the practice. Say plainly that the aim is not to change their faith or custom; ask what they need from you; return to 4.1.
Stuck: the client agrees with the formulation but keeps re-opening the book. Check for covert substitutes (apps, mental verse-picking, asking relatives); lower the hierarchy step; strengthen the delay rule (IOCDF's example is 30 minutes) [source: IOCDF]; involve the trusted leader once (4.5).
Resistance framed as faith ("stopping would be disobedience"). Do not argue theology. Ask the client to check with their own clergy what is required; IOCDF guidance holds that clients follow their faith's actual teaching rather than OCD's [source: IOCDF]. If the client declines clergy input, work on the distress and the costs they themselves name.
Overwhelm during exposure. Pause, ground, step back down the hierarchy, and review consent. Never push an exposure the client experiences as sacrilege.
Non-adherence with monitoring. Shorten the log to one line per day (urge, consulted yes/no, distress 0–10); review it at the start of each session.
Rupture after the therapist seemed sceptical or offered a reading. Name it, apologise, restate the stance ("your tradition's meaning, your decision"), and ask what would rebuild trust.
The client asks the therapist to believe, or to say it is "just chance". Neither is your role. Reflect the question back to its meaning for the client and keep to attribution (section 3).
A passage is directing the client away from medical care or treatment. Treat it as a high-stakes decision (4.4); encourage the client to talk it over with their doctor and their clergy; never advise on medicines; assess risk; follow safeguarding procedures if a child is affected.
Ominous verse with suicidal ideation. Prioritise risk assessment and safety planning (4.7); involve crisis services as your standard protocol requires.
Ongoing payments to a reader. Use 4.9; contact consumer-protection or police routes with the client's consent; address shame.
Family conflict over consultations. Offer a joint session if the client wishes; acknowledge each person's attachment to the tradition; centre the adult client's choice.
Contested historical claims raised by the client (for example whether Roman emperors really used Virgil this way). Say the history is debated among scholars [source: CAMWS 2015 abstract] and return to the client's meaning; avoid lecturing.
Possible psychosis or mania. Refer for assessment (4.10); keep the referral respectful of the client's faith; continue supportive contact.
Therapist's own spiritual practice. If you consult texts this way yourself, notice any pull to share or endorse; take it to supervision; keep roles separate (4.11).
Cross-cultural uncertainty (unfamiliar tradition, language of the text). Ask the client to teach you; consult cultural or religious advisers with consent; avoid generalising from one community to another. Opinion on bibliomancy varies within Islam, Judaism and Christianity [source: Afshar; Khanbhai; Sanzo].
A Chabad client worries that discussing the Rebbe or his letters with an outside therapist is disrespectful. Ask permission before exploring, follow the client's pace, and offer to work alongside their rabbi (4.13).
The client asks whether an istikhāra result or an Igrot Kodesh passage "counts". Do not rule on it. Help the client take the question once to their scholar or rabbi, and watch for repeated asking as reassurance-seeking (4.14, 4.15).
The client is caught between family custom and clergy who condemn the practice. Explore both attachments without adjudicating; the CFI's spirituality module asks about distress or conflict related to religious identity [source: APA, CFI Supplementary Modules]; centre what the client wants.
App use is hidden or minimised. Normalise it, ask about each route, and fold it into the hierarchy (4.16).
A behavioural experiment goes well but the client credits luck. Review what was learned about tolerating not knowing, whatever the outcome, and plan the next experiment (4.17).

Sources

Books cited:

Luijendijk, A. and Klingshirn, W. E. (eds) (2018). My Lots Are in Thy Hands: Sortilege and Its Practitioners in Late Antiquity. Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 188. Leiden: Brill.
van der Horst, P. W. (2002). Japheth in the Tents of Shem: Studies on Jewish Hellenism in Antiquity. Leuven: Peeters. Includes "Sortes: Sacred Books as Instant Oracles in Late Antiquity".
von Franz, M.-L. (1980). On Divination and Synchronicity: The Psychology of Meaningful Chance. Studies in Jungian Psychology 3. Publisher [uncertain: not verified].
Usher, P. M. (2015). "'Pricking in Virgil': Early Modern Prophetic Phronesis and the Sortes Virgilianae." Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies [uncertain: not verified; cited via Smyth].
Keshavarzi, H., Harfi, S., Elzamzamy, K., Khan, F. and Kaban, E. (2023). The Islamic Workbook for Religious OCD (Waswasa): A Guide for Overcoming Intrusive Thoughts and Compulsions. ISBN 9781800119796. Publisher [uncertain: not verified].

← Previous · XIV-204Dream interpretation and dream incubation Next · XIV-206 →Biorhythms