Atlas›Domain XV · Nature, philosophy, social & rites of passage›Guide 127
Guide XV-127

Journalling

Pennebaker1986
A 25 · L 54 · M 2122 interventions in the Trinity explorer
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: Pennebaker's expressive writing paradigm as described in Pennebaker (1997) and adapted for clinical use by Baikie and Wilhelm (2005), with the gratitude journal as the Greater Good Science Center publishes it (based on Emmons and McCullough 2003) and Kathleen Adams's structured, contained journalling as she describes it in interview. Progoff's Intensive Journal method and Adams's journal therapy have their own guides (cross-refer VIII 129 Intensive Journal; VIII 130 journal therapy); art journaling is VIII 031.

Journalling is an everyday practice, not a psychotherapy. Clients often already keep a diary; therapists can also assign specific, researched writing tasks. The best-studied form is expressive writing: in the laboratory paradigm, people write privately, without feedback, about their deepest thoughts and feelings on an important emotional issue for a short period on a few occasions, while controls write about superficial topics [source: Pennebaker 1997]. Pennebaker and his students reported in 1986 that writing about an upsetting event for as little as 15 minutes a day on three consecutive days could improve physical and mental health [source: Expressive Writing site, UT Austin].

How change is thought to happen, as the developers frame it: putting experience into language matters more than emotional release alone (movement-only expression did not improve health, movement plus writing did); in linguistic analyses, increasing use of causal and insight words across the writing days, moderate rather than extreme negative-emotion words and more positive-emotion words predicted better health; people who benefited tended to move from disorganised accounts to a coherent story by the last day. An earlier inhibition account (holding back disclosure as a chronic stressor) received inconsistent support [source: Pennebaker 1997]. Gratitude journalling works, on the Greater Good account, by redirecting attention to good events that people tend to overlook and by making them more vivid through concrete words [source: GGSC gratitude journal].

Evidence status (one line): a random-effects meta-analysis of 146 randomized studies found a small positive average effect (r = .075) of experimental disclosure [source: Frattaroli 2006, PubMed abstract]; a meta-analysis of clinical samples reported by Baikie and Wilhelm found a non-significant effect on psychological outcomes in psychiatric populations (d = 0.07) [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005, citing Frisina et al. 2004]. Gratitude journalling showed gains in gratitude, positive mood, optimism and sleep in Emmons and McCullough's samples, as the Greater Good Science Center summarises them [source: GGSC gratitude journal].

2. Framework

Expressive writing is a brief, bounded adjunct, not a course of therapy. Baikie and Wilhelm describe it as a short-term intervention to open a dialogue with oneself or "unblock" a difficult issue, followed by a debriefing, and say it should not replace medical or psychological treatment [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Pennebaker, as reported from a 2010 conference talk, called it a "life course correction" and did not recommend it as a regular, ongoing habit [source: Hawkins 2010, Good Medicine blog; secondary report] [uncertain: not verified in a primary text].

Phases [synthesis of sources cited per phase]:

  1. Assessment and timing. Goal: decide whether, when and in which form to write. Clarify the client's current diagnosis and stability, how recent the event is, current treatment, and any existing journal habit. Pennebaker is reported to advise waiting at least one or two months after a trauma, and some studies found people who wrote immediately afterwards felt worse [source: Harvard Health 2011]. Move on when the client is stable enough, the event is not acute, and the client consents.
  2. Preparation. Goal: informed consent, privacy and storage plan, setting, contingency plan for distress, contact numbers [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005].
  3. Writing block. Parameters as the original protocols describe them (attributed, not prescribed): research paradigms used 3 to 5 consecutive days of 15 to 30 minutes in the laboratory [source: Pennebaker 1997]; Baikie and Wilhelm's clinical adaptation describes setting aside about 30 minutes (about 20 for writing and 10 to compose oneself) on 3 or 4 occasions, on consecutive days or weeks, with sessions capped at 20 minutes unless the client wishes and it is feasible to continue [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. A weak trend suggested that sessions spaced a week apart may be at least as effective as consecutive days [source: Pennebaker 1997]. Writing may be homework or done before, during or after a session [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. These figures describe the published studies, not a required amount; the client and therapist agree the arrangement [synthesis].
  4. Debriefing. Goal: review how the writing felt and what shifted, without reading or grading the text unless the client wishes; manage residual distress [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005].
  5. Decision. Goal: stop, repeat later, switch to structured writing or gratitude writing, or refer on (for example, to trauma-focused therapy) [synthesis].

Gratitude journal (separate track): the Greater Good Science Center's published practice suggests about 15 minutes per entry, at least three times a week, for at least two weeks (the publisher's suggestion, reported here, not prescribed); in Emmons and McCullough's studies participants wrote weekly for ten weeks or daily for two weeks [source: GGSC gratitude journal].

Criteria for moving between phases [synthesis]: do not start if the client is in acute crisis, recently traumatised, or untreated for severe PTSD or depression; after each writing block check distress settling, sleep and functioning; stop or switch to contained, structured writing if the client feels worse beyond the short-term dip.

3. Guiding principles

  • Adjunct, not substitute. Use writing alongside treatment, not instead of it [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Practical meaning: keep the treatment plan; writing serves it.
  • The client chooses the topic. Let the client pick the experience rather than assigning a specific trauma; Baikie and Wilhelm suggest that assigned topics may explain some null findings [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Practical meaning: offer the frame, not the content.
  • The client structures the writing. Do not impose structure in standard expressive writing [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]; offer structure when containment is needed (see Adams, below). Practical meaning: match structure to stability.
  • Privacy is the default. The writing is for the client, not the clinician; the clinician does not read it unless invited and keeps it out of the clinical file [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Practical meaning: say so explicitly before the first assignment.
  • No feedback on the text. Feedback is not part of the paradigm and was not needed for effects [source: Pennebaker 1997; Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Practical meaning: never correct, interpret or grade journal content.
  • Form does not matter; honesty does. Spelling and grammar are irrelevant; keep writing until time is up [source: Pennebaker 1997]. Practical meaning: lower the bar for "good" writing.
  • Expect a short-term dip. Negative mood rises immediately after writing; this did not appear harmful in the studies reviewed [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Practical meaning: forewarn the client and plan time to compose.
  • First do no harm. Adams's rule: if journalling is making you feel worse, that is a signal to stop and look again [source: Adams interview, Psychology Today]. Practical meaning: worsening beyond the dip ends or changes the task.
  • Contain and pace with trauma. Adams describes unstructured trauma writing as "unstructured, unbalanced, uncontained and unpaced" and recommends small, contained pieces [source: Adams interview]. Practical meaning: begin with stems or short timed entries for fragile clients.
  • Timing after trauma. Avoid much writing immediately after a trauma [source: Hawkins 2010, reporting Pennebaker; Harvard Health 2011]. Practical meaning: stabilise first, write later.
  • Choice and permission. Adams says choices and permission enrich the practice and that rigid methods backfire for some [source: Adams interview]. Practical meaning: offer several formats and let the client adapt.
  • Language and story. Benefit tracks movement towards causal, insight-rich, coherent narrative [source: Pennebaker 1997]. Practical meaning: in debriefing, ask about understanding and meaning, not just feelings.
  • Respect the existing habit. Many clients already journal and may experience it as a lifeline (an Adams patient called it that) [source: Adams interview]. Practical meaning: ask before changing a client's own practice.
  • Stay in scope. Journals that drift into food, weight, exercise, sleep or medicine logs are not the place for targets or prescriptions [synthesis]. Practical meaning: route to the appropriate professional (Section 5).

4. Intervention inventory

The published sources describe a small number of writing tasks; the therapist-side procedures around them (assessment, preparation, debriefing, referral, meaning-making) are given here in full, with the source for each step or a [synthesis] tag where the procedure is clinical inference.

4.1 Suitability and timing assessment

  • Purpose: decide whether expressive writing fits now, and in which form. Use before any trauma- or emotion-focused writing assignment.
  • Steps: (1) Ask what the client wants to write about, in broad terms only. (2) Establish how long ago the event happened; Pennebaker is reported to advise waiting at least one or two months after a trauma [source: Harvard Health 2011]. (3) Review current diagnosis and stability: most studies excluded people with major emotional or physical health problems or substance misuse, so applicability to them is unknown [source: Pennebaker 1997]; Baikie and Wilhelm note detrimental findings in adult survivors of childhood abuse and in a small sample of veterans with PTSD [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (4) Screen current suicide risk using your usual risk assessment [synthesis]. (5) Ask about existing journal habits and whether anyone else reads them [synthesis]. (6) Choose: standard expressive writing, contained structured writing (4.12), gratitude writing (4.15), or referral to a trauma-focused treatment (4.19).
  • Example language (illustrative): "Before I suggest any writing, I'd like to know how recent this is and how you're coping day to day. Writing can stir things up for a while, so we'll pick the right time and form."
  • Watch for: acute grief or a very recent event, active PTSD, severe depression, dissociation, current self-harm or substance misuse; these point to stabilisation, contained writing or referral rather than open trauma writing [synthesis drawing on the cautions above]. Working: a clear, agreed choice of task and timing.

4.2 Rationale and informed consent

  • Purpose: give the client an accurate picture of what writing does and costs.
  • Steps: (1) Explain the task in a sentence or two. (2) Say that many people feel more upset straight after writing and that this short-term dip did not appear harmful in the studies reviewed [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (3) State that the client may stop at any time and give contact numbers in case of distress [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (4) State that writing is an adjunct to treatment, not a replacement [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (5) Invite questions and record consent in your notes [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "People often feel a bit worse right after writing and better over the following weeks. You can stop at any point. This sits alongside our work; it doesn't replace it."
  • Watch for: a client agreeing to please you; offer genuine choice and an easy way to decline [synthesis]. Working: the client can say in their own words what they will do and what to do if upset.

4.3 Privacy and storage plan

  • Purpose: make honest writing possible by protecting it.
  • Steps: (1) Explain that the writing is for the client, not the clinician, and that you will not read it unless they want you to [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (2) Agree where it is kept: with the client or separate from the clinical file [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (3) Discuss who else might find it (partners, parents, carers, shared devices, cloud accounts) and options such as a locked notebook, a password, or destroying the pages after writing; Pennebaker reports that writing on a pad that erased itself gave the same results as handing pages in [source: Pennebaker 1997]. (4) For clients in an abusive relationship, assess whether a written record could put them at risk if discovered [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "This is your writing. I won't ask to see it. You can keep it, lock it away, or tear it up afterwards; what matters is that you write it."
  • Watch for: self-censoring because someone might read it; fear in a client whose partner monitors them (treat as a safety issue) [synthesis]. Working: the client reports writing freely.

4.4 Setting up the writing

  • Purpose: make the practical conditions match the published method.
  • Steps: (1) Agree a private, personalised place without distractions [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (2) Agree the time with the client; for reference, Baikie and Wilhelm's clinical adaptation describes about 30 minutes reserved, about 20 for writing and 10 to compose oneself, on 3 or 4 occasions on consecutive days or weeks [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (3) Offer handwriting or computer [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (4) Avoid scheduling just before work, driving, childcare or bed if the client tends to stay activated [synthesis]. (5) Agree a contingency plan for distress and book the debriefing appointment [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let's choose three or four times that suit you, somewhere private, with ten minutes afterwards to settle before you get on with your day."
  • Watch for: no private space (shared housing, young carers), in which case consider writing in or just before the session [synthesis]. Working: sessions happen as planned.

4.5 Standard expressive writing assignment

  • Purpose: the core task, for a stable client with a significant unresolved emotional experience.
  • Steps (paraphrasing the published instructions): (1) Write about your very deepest thoughts and feelings about the most upsetting experience of your life or another important emotional issue [source: Pennebaker 1997; Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (2) You may link it to your relationships, your past, present or future, or who you have been, are or want to be [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (3) You may write about the same topic each time or a different one [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (4) Do not worry about spelling or grammar; keep writing until the time is up [source: Pennebaker 1997]. (5) No one will give feedback [source: Pennebaker 1997]. Use your own wording; the instructions are paraphrased here, not quoted.
  • Example language (illustrative): "For the time we agreed, write about what this really means to you: what you felt, what you thought, how it connects to the rest of your life. Don't stop to fix anything. If you run out, repeat yourself until the time is up."
  • Watch for: purely factual, emotionless accounts (the client may be avoiding; gently invite feelings and meaning) or overwhelming flooding (shorten, contain, see 4.12) [synthesis]. Working: in debriefing the client reports some new understanding or a more settled view of the event over the occasions [source for the mechanism: Pennebaker 1997].

4.6 In-session writing

  • Purpose: for clients who cannot write safely or privately at home, or who need support nearby.
  • Steps: (1) Offer writing before, during or after a session [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (2) Leave the room or sit apart and do not watch the page [synthesis]. (3) Allow time to compose afterwards before talking [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (4) Ask about the experience, not the content, unless the client offers it [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "I'll sit over here and won't look. Take the time we agreed; we'll have time afterwards before you leave."
  • Watch for: the client writing for you rather than for themselves [synthesis]. Working: the client uses the time and leaves settled.

4.7 Spaced or shorter schedules

  • Purpose: fit the task to the client's life or tolerance.
  • Steps: (1) Offer weekly spacing; Pennebaker reported a weak trend that longer spacing may strengthen effects [source: Pennebaker 1997]. (2) Pennebaker was reported in 2010 to be testing condensed formats, such as several short bouts in one sitting with breaks between [source: Hawkins 2010, secondary report] [uncertain: not verified in a published trial]. (3) Agree the schedule with the client and keep the total number of occasions small [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Would spacing the writing out, for example once a week, suit you better than writing on consecutive days?"
  • Watch for: schedules that drift into open-ended daily rumination [synthesis]. Working: the client completes the agreed occasions.

4.8 Composing oneself after writing

  • Purpose: manage the immediate rise in negative mood.
  • Steps: (1) Build in the ten minutes after writing to compose oneself [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (2) Suggest a grounding or transition activity the client already knows (a walk, a shower, a call to a friend, a familiar relaxation or mindfulness exercise) [synthesis]. (3) Remind the client of the contact numbers and the contingency plan [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005].
  • Example language (illustrative): "When the timer goes, put the pen down and do something ordinary that brings you back into the day."
  • Watch for: distress that persists for days, sleep disruption, nightmares, increased use of alcohol or drugs, or self-harm urges; pause the writing and review [synthesis]. Working: distress settles within the day.

4.9 Debriefing appointment

  • Purpose: review effects and decide what comes next; Wilhelm recommends a follow-up debriefing [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005].
  • Steps: (1) Ask how each writing occasion felt and what happened afterwards. (2) Ask whether anything about the event looks different now. (3) Ask what the client wants to do with the writing (keep, destroy, share). (4) Decide next step: stop, repeat later, change form, or bring the theme into therapy [synthesis for steps 1 to 4, within the debrief Baikie and Wilhelm describe].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Without telling me what you wrote unless you want to: what was it like, and has anything shifted in how you see it?"
  • Watch for: pressure to show you the pages to prove compliance; do not ask for them [source for not reading: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Working: the client names a change in understanding, mood or functioning.

4.10 Meaning and narrative focus in debriefing

  • Purpose: support the processes linked with benefit in the linguistic studies: causal and insight language, moderate emotion, and a coherent story [source: Pennebaker 1997].
  • Steps: (1) Invite the client to say what they now understand about why it happened or what it meant (causal and insight words). (2) Ask about any positive feelings or strengths that showed up alongside the pain. (3) Ask whether the account feels more like a story with a beginning, middle and end. (4) Do not push for a positive frame [synthesis for applying these findings to debriefing].
  • Example language (illustrative): "What makes more sense to you now than it did before you started writing?"
  • Watch for: forced silver linings; repetitive accounts that do not change across occasions (rumination rather than processing) [synthesis]. Working: the client's account becomes more organised and less charged [source for the pattern: Pennebaker 1997].

4.11 Talking instead of writing

  • Purpose: for clients with literacy difficulties, dyslexia, visual or motor impairment, or a strong dislike of writing.
  • Steps: (1) Offer speaking into a recorder; writing and talking into a tape recorder or to a therapist produced comparable effects [source: Pennebaker 1997]. (2) Apply the same privacy, timing and composing steps (4.3, 4.4, 4.8). (3) For clients writing in a second language, offer their first language [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "If writing gets in the way, you can talk it into your phone instead, privately, and delete it afterwards if you like."
  • Watch for: recordings stored on shared or synced devices [synthesis]. Working: the client completes the task in the chosen form.

4.12 Contained writing with sentence stems (Adams's Journal Ladder)

  • Purpose: safe, paced writing for highly distressed or traumatised clients, or for anyone who floods in free writing. Adams developed the Journal Ladder while working with highly traumatised patients in a psychiatric hospital [source: Adams interview]. Full method: cross-refer VIII 130 journal therapy.
  • Steps (Adams's structure, in outline): (1) Offer a short sentence stem, of the kind Adams cites such as "Today I feel" or "Right now I want". (2) The client completes the sentence, puts a full stop and stops. (3) If they wish, they may add one more sentence or write a little longer, then stop [source: Adams interview]. (4) Build up gradually only if the client stays settled [synthesis]. The full rungs of the ladder are not reproduced here [uncertain: full sequence not verified].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Just finish this one sentence, then stop. That's the whole task today."
  • Watch for: a client who feels this is too little; offer the choice to go slightly further, keeping the stop point [source for choice and permission: Adams interview]. Working: the client can write about difficult material in small pieces without being overwhelmed.

4.13 Turning a circle into a spiral

  • Purpose: for clients whose journalling has become circular or self-absorbed. Adams suggests asking how an insight could serve others or what its higher purpose is [source: Adams interview].
  • Steps: (1) Notice with the client that entries repeat. (2) Invite a closing question at the end of an entry about how the insight could be used or what it serves. (3) Review in session whether entries are moving [synthesis for steps 1 and 3].
  • Example language (illustrative): "When you notice you're going round the same loop, try ending the entry with: what could I do with this, or who might it help?"
  • Watch for: the question becoming a demand to be useful or self-sacrificing in depressed or people-pleasing clients [synthesis]. Working: entries end with a next step or new angle.

4.14 "What if" prompts

  • Purpose: to open imagination and inner richness, especially for clients who feel their outer lives are dull; Adams recommends "what if" questions for this [source: Adams interview].
  • Steps: (1) Offer one "what if" prompt related to the client's goal or stuck point. (2) Let the client write freely for a short entry. (3) Discuss what surprised them [synthesis for steps 1 to 3].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Write a page starting with: what if the next year went better than I expect?"
  • Watch for: catastrophic "what ifs" in anxious clients, which can feed worry; frame prompts towards possibility, not threat [synthesis]. Working: new options or wishes appear in the writing.

4.15 Gratitude journal

  • Purpose: to build attention to good events and positive mood; suited to general well-being work and to rebuilding positive experience once acute distress is under control. Based on Emmons and McCullough (2003) as the Greater Good Science Center publishes it [source: GGSC gratitude journal].
  • Steps (GGSC structure, paraphrased): (1) List up to five things you are grateful for, writing them down rather than only thinking them. (2) Include small or large things. (3) Recall each one and savour the feeling. (4) Be specific; prefer depth over breadth; name people rather than things; savour surprises; vary the details; write at a regular time. The GGSC page suggests about 15 minutes, at least three times a week, for at least two weeks; this is the publisher's suggestion, not a prescription, and the client sets the rhythm [source: GGSC gratitude journal].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Pick one or two things from today and write them in detail: who did what, and how it felt."
  • Watch for: use as a way to dismiss real grievances, abuse or injustice; clients in grief or depression who feel pressured to be grateful; flat, repetitive lists [synthesis]. Working: the client reports noticing good moments more readily; Emmons and McCullough's participants reported more gratitude, positive mood, optimism and better sleep [source: GGSC gratitude journal].

4.16 Mental subtraction (gratitude variant)

  • Purpose: to refresh a gratitude practice that has gone stale. The Greater Good Science Center suggests considering how things would have been worse without someone or something [source: GGSC gratitude journal].
  • Steps: (1) Choose one good person or event. (2) Write how life would be without it, or what bad outcome was avoided. (3) Return to appreciating that it is present [source: GGSC gratitude journal, paraphrased].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Imagine this friendship had never happened. What would be missing? Then write what having it gives you."
  • Watch for: clients with recent bereavement or loss, for whom imagining absence may be painful rather than refreshing [synthesis]. Working: renewed warmth or appreciation.

4.17 Integrating writing with other treatment components

  • Purpose: to place writing within a wider plan. Wilhelm uses expressive writing alongside daily mood charts, problem-solving, goal-setting, relaxation, mindfulness and exercise prescription [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005].
  • Steps: (1) Decide what the writing is for in this plan (unblocking an issue, opening a topic, adding positive experience). (2) Link it to the client's mood monitoring or goals. (3) Exercise, sleep, food or medicine are not prescribed through the journal: activity scheduling sits within behavioural activation (II 040) and exercise questions go to the client's physician or a qualified exercise professional; insomnia goes to CBT-I, the first-line treatment (II 069; stimulus control and sleep restriction II 068) or sleep medicine; nutrition goes to a registered dietitian (IX 103) [synthesis for routing].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let's use the writing to get this issue moving, and keep tracking your mood on the chart so we can see what helps."
  • Watch for: a journal turning into a performance log (steps, calories, weight, hours slept) [synthesis]. Working: the writing feeds discussion in therapy.

4.18 Deciding about sharing the writing

  • Purpose: to help the client decide whether and how to share what they wrote. Patients may share with others if they choose, and some found sharing with a partner helpful [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Pennebaker, as reported, suggested that reading the writing aloud to others can be a bad idea and that telling the person about it may be better than reading it verbatim [source: Hawkins 2010, secondary report] [uncertain: not verified].
  • Steps: (1) Ask whether the client wants anyone to know about the writing. (2) Explore likely reactions. (3) Consider telling the gist rather than handing over or reading the text. (4) Rehearse the conversation in session if helpful [synthesis for steps 1, 2 and 4].
  • Example language (illustrative): "You don't have to show anyone. If you want your partner to know, you might tell them what you learned rather than reading it out."
  • Watch for: sharing writing with the person who caused harm, or posting it publicly, without considering safety or consequences [synthesis]. Working: any sharing is chosen, safe and helpful.

4.19 Referral to trauma-focused treatment, including written exposure

  • Purpose: when the assessment points to PTSD rather than a target for unstructured expressive writing. Written Exposure Therapy (WET) is a distinct, structured five-session treatment in which patients write about their specific traumatic event following scripted instructions; in a randomized non-inferiority trial it was as effective as cognitive processing therapy, with fewer dropouts [source: NIMH 2018, reporting Sloan et al. 2018].
  • Steps: (1) Assess PTSD with a standard measure [synthesis]. (2) Explain that open-ended trauma writing at home is not a substitute for trauma-focused treatment [source for adjunct status: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. (3) Refer to a clinician trained in WET or another recommended trauma-focused therapy, or seek training before delivering it [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "What you're describing sounds like post-traumatic stress. There's a structured writing-based treatment for that, delivered by a trained therapist, which is different from journalling on your own."
  • Watch for: clients using private trauma writing to avoid treatment, or worsening with it [synthesis]. Working: the client engages with appropriate treatment.

4.20 Working with the client's own journal and its meaning

  • Purpose: many clients arrive with a lifelong diary, a faith-based or spiritual journal, or one inherited from a parent; the practice itself carries meaning [synthesis]. Adams notes that journalling can be done with spiritual intention, but spirituality is optional [source: Adams interview].
  • Steps: (1) Ask what the journal is for and what it has meant over time. (2) Ask what the client wants from it now. (3) Respect it as the client's own; do not convert it into homework without consent. (4) Where a spiritual or religious journal is involved and the client's difficulty centres on faith, consider the DSM-5-TR Cultural Formulation Interview and its supplementary module on spirituality, religion and moral traditions [synthesis] [uncertain: DSM-5-TR text not verified].
  • Example language (illustrative): "You've kept a journal since you were a teenager. What has it been for you, and what do you want it to be now?"
  • Watch for: shame about old entries, grief over lost or destroyed journals, family members who read or published a journal [synthesis]. Working: the client relates to the journal as a resource rather than a burden.

4.21 Ending or pausing the writing

  • Purpose: expressive writing is meant to be short-term [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]; Pennebaker is reported not to recommend it as a regular habit [source: Hawkins 2010, secondary report] [uncertain: not verified].
  • Steps: (1) At the debrief, review what the writing achieved. (2) Agree whether to stop, keep a lighter everyday journal, switch to gratitude writing, or return to expressive writing later if a new difficulty arises. (3) Record the plan [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "This was a short piece of work to help with one issue. You can always come back to it if something new comes up."
  • Watch for: daily writing about the same distressing topic continuing for weeks without change [synthesis]. Working: the client has a clear, chosen relationship with writing going forward.

4.22 Children and young people

  • Purpose: adapting journalling for minors. Pennebaker reports studies spanning children to elderly people [source: Pennebaker 1997]; specific child protocols are [uncertain: not verified].
  • Steps: (1) Obtain parental consent and the young person's assent as your service requires [synthesis]. (2) Agree with the young person and parents that the journal is private, within the limits of safeguarding [synthesis]. (3) Explain those limits in age-appropriate language [synthesis]. (4) Prefer contained prompts (4.12) and short tasks [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Your journal is yours. The only time I'd need to tell someone is if you or someone else wasn't safe."
  • Watch for: disclosures of abuse or self-harm in writing a young person brings in; follow safeguarding procedures [synthesis]. Working: the young person uses writing voluntarily.

5. Handling problems

  • Client feels worse right after writing. Expected; forewarn and normalise; this short-term rise in negative mood did not appear harmful in the studies reviewed [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Use the composing time and contingency plan (4.8).
  • Client feels worse over days, or symptoms worsen. Apply Adams's rule that worsening is a signal to stop and look again [source: Adams interview]. Pause, review at the debrief, switch to contained stems (4.12) or refer to trauma-focused treatment (4.19). Detrimental findings were reported for adult survivors of childhood abuse and a small veteran PTSD sample [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005], so take particular care with these groups [synthesis].
  • Overwhelm or flooding during writing. Stop the session, ground, and next time use sentence stems with a clear stop point; Adams stresses taking material in small, contained pieces [source: Adams interview]. If dissociation occurs, move to stabilisation work before further writing [synthesis].
  • Recent trauma or acute grief. Defer; Pennebaker is reported to advise waiting at least one or two months [source: Harvard Health 2011]. Baikie and Wilhelm list bereavement among conditions where expressive writing showed no significant advantage over control writing [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]. Offer grief-focused support and assess for prolonged grief disorder as DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 describe it, cross-referring the Domain XV death and mourning guides [synthesis] [uncertain: diagnostic texts not verified].
  • Stuck: flat, factual or intellectualised writing. Invite feelings and meaning in the debrief rather than correcting the text (4.10). Baikie and Wilhelm report greater benefit for people high in alexithymia [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005], so a slow start is not a reason to stop [synthesis].
  • Rumination: writing the same thing repeatedly. Pennebaker is reported to see excessive thinking about an event as a cue to consider writing, but only after some time has passed [source: Hawkins 2010, secondary report] [uncertain: not verified]. Use the spiral question (4.13), limit the number of occasions, and treat persistent worry with your usual worry or rumination methods [synthesis].
  • Non-adherence. Ask what got in the way without judgement: privacy, time, fear of what will come up, literacy, or a dislike of writing [synthesis]. Offer in-session writing (4.6), talking instead (4.11), weekly spacing (4.7) or a different form. Accept a no; the task is optional [synthesis].
  • Client brings the journal and wants you to read it. Respect their choice, but the method does not require it and gives no feedback on content [source: Baikie and Wilhelm 2005; Pennebaker 1997]. If you read it, respond to the person, not the prose, and ask what they hoped you would notice [synthesis].
  • Rupture: the client feels pressured or exposed, or thinks you are judging the writing. Acknowledge, restate privacy and no-feedback, and return control to the client [synthesis].
  • Suicidal or self-harm content appears in writing or debriefing. Conduct a standard risk assessment and safety plan, including lethal-means counselling as indicated; share crisis lines: 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline (US) and Samaritans 116 123 (UK and Ireland) [synthesis]. Revisit whether the writing task should continue.
  • Disclosure of abuse or risk to others. Follow safeguarding and legal duties as for any disclosure; for minors, follow child-protection procedures (4.22) [synthesis].
  • Journal discovered by a partner, parent or carer, or concern that it could be used in legal or family proceedings. Review storage, consider not keeping written records, and seek legal advice where proceedings are live; where a partner's monitoring is involved, assess domestic abuse risk [synthesis].
  • The journal becomes a food, weight, exercise or sleep log. Do not set targets, plans or schedules. Screen for disordered eating and refer to a registered dietitian or an eating-disorder service; for eating-disorder support point to the National Alliance for Eating Disorders. Exercise questions go to the client's physician or a qualified exercise professional, with any activity work framed as behavioural activation (II 040; IX 061). Insomnia goes to CBT-I (II 069; II 068) or sleep medicine. Never advise starting, stopping or changing a medicine [synthesis].
  • Gratitude feels false or invalidating. Do not push; validate grievance and loss first, and offer gratitude writing later or not at all [synthesis].
  • Cultural, literacy and language barriers. Offer the client's first language, speech instead of writing (4.11), or images; art journaling has its own guide (VIII 031) [synthesis].
  • Dual roles: the therapist also runs a writing group or workshop. Keep therapy clients and group members' boundaries clear, be explicit about confidentiality in groups, and work within training; Adams's Therapeutic Writing Institute offers professional training in journal therapy [source for the institute: Adams interview; synthesis for the rest]. Check that your professional indemnity covers group writing work [synthesis].
  • No effect. Effects in the research are small on average and inconsistent in psychiatric samples [source: Frattaroli 2006; Baikie and Wilhelm 2005]; if nothing changes, stop and rely on the main treatment rather than escalating the writing [synthesis].

Sources

← Previous · XV-126Gratitude practiceNext · XV-128 →Sabbath and rest