1. Introduction
Version followed: William Breitbart's Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (MCP) as published in the two Breitbart & Poppito (2014) Oxford manuals: Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy (MCGP, 8 weekly sessions) and Individual Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (IMCP, 7 weekly sessions). Session structure and titles are taken from the IMCP trial protocol (NCT01323309) and press/secondary descriptions; the manual text itself is not drawn on here, so exercise wording below is paraphrased from published descriptions or marked [uncertain]. Adaptations (survivors, caregivers, palliative, Spanish, Chinese, Japanese) are noted where relevant.
MCP is a brief, manualised, largely psychoeducational and experiential psychotherapy developed by William Breitbart and colleagues (Shannon Poppito co-author of the manuals) at MSK, New York, for patients with advanced cancer who experience existential distress: loss of meaning, hopelessness, demoralisation, desire for hastened death. It applies Viktor Frankl's logotherapy concepts. Its theory of change: meaning persists to the end of life even if its form changes; the will to meaning is a primary motive; people keep the freedom to choose their attitude to suffering; meaning can be found through creative, experiential and attitudinal sources and through legacy (past, present, future). By teaching these sources and helping patients reconnect with them through structured reflection, the therapy aims to restore or enhance meaning, peace and purpose, which buffers despair as death approaches. Breitbart frames meaninglessness as an existential concern, not a depressive symptom to be treated as such. [source: NCT01323309 protocol; ASCO Post 2015; Yahoo/TIME feature]
2. Framework
Format [source: NCT01323309 protocol; ASCO Post 2015; Yahoo/TIME feature; MSK training brochure]
- MCGP: 8 weekly sessions of about 1.5 hours (some descriptions say up to 2 hours), groups of roughly 6–8 patients, one or two trained leaders.
- IMCP: 7 weekly sessions of about 60 minutes. Window of about 14 weeks allowed so illness-related gaps (fortnightly sessions) do not end treatment; telephone or teleconference sessions permitted for hospitalised or very ill patients at the clinician's discretion.
- Every session combines three elements: didactic teaching of a meaning concept; an experiential exercise (structured reflective questions, answered privately/in writing and then shared); open-ended discussion with the therapist's interpretive comments linking material to meaning. Readings and homework tied to the theme, including Frankl's Man's Search for Meaning. An optional Legacy Project runs across the course.
- Eligibility used in trials: adults with advanced solid tumours, ambulatory, distress thermometer 4 or more, Karnofsky 60 or more (able to attend 7 outpatient sessions); exclude significant cognitive impairment and severe uncontrolled psychiatric disturbance (stable treated conditions allowed).
- Therapists: master's-level or higher mental-health clinicians, trained via workshops, supervision and boosters to prevent drift; fidelity via session checklists.
Session sequence
| IMCP (7) | MCGP (8) | Theme | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Concepts and sources of meaning | Introductions, orientation, define meaning and its sources; recall meaningful moments |
| 2 | 2 | Cancer and meaning: identity before and after diagnosis | Map identity and how illness has changed or spared it |
| 3 | 3 | Historical sources: legacy received (past) | Life story; how one became who one is |
| 3 | 4 | Historical sources: legacy lived (present) and given (future) | Accomplishments, what one still wants to do; launch Legacy Project |
| 4 | 5 | Attitudinal sources: encountering life's limitations | Choosing an attitude to finitude, loss and suffering |
| 5 | 6 | Creative sources: creativity, courage, responsibility | Taking ownership of one's life and remaining tasks |
| 6 | 7 | Experiential sources: love, beauty, humour | Reconnecting with life through what moves one |
| 7 | 8 | Transitions: reflection and hopes for the future | Review, Legacy Project presentation, hope, goodbye |
[source: NCT01323309 protocol for IMCP titles; MCGP 8-session order as reported in van der Spek et al. 2014 and Leiden thesis summary of the original; Hayashi & Onishi 2021 case]
Criteria for moving between phases. MCP is time-limited and session-driven: the next theme follows the calendar, not a mastery criterion. Practical judgement is still needed [synthesis]: complete the core experiential exercise of the session before moving on; if a patient is acutely distressed, medically unwell or in crisis, give the session to that need and resume the theme next week (the 14-week window allows this); if attitudinal or end-of-life material is premature, approach death-related questions gently and only when the patient shows readiness (the Japanese couples case described the therapist judging readiness before discussing a good death in session 6). [source: NCT01323309; Hayashi & Onishi 2021]
Published variants [source: UCSD grand rounds slides; Zaragoza thesis 2024; van der Spek et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2023; Hayashi & Onishi 2021]
- MCP-PC (Rosenfeld et al. 2017): 3-session palliative-care version for inpatients with short prognosis.
- MCP-C / MCP-CC (Applebaum et al. 2015; Oxford manual and caregiver workbook): 7 sessions for family caregivers of cancer patients.
- MCGP-CS (van der Spek, Netherlands): 8 × 2-hour weekly sessions for cancer survivors; brief meditation opens each experiential exercise; "Life lessons portfolio" workbook; attitudinal session reframed from meaningful death to present limitations.
- MCP-EC (Quílez Bielsa, Spain): 4 × 45-minute sessions integrating "essential care".
- Chinese MCGP (Wang et al. 2023): twice weekly for 4 weeks; "legacy" renamed "story".
- Meaning-centred couples work (Japan): 7 sessions every 2 weeks, 1 hour, delivered by a trained oncology nurse.
3. Guiding principles
[source for Frankl-derived principles: NCT01323309 protocol; ASCO Post 2015. Content areas freedom, responsibility, choice, creativity, identity, the three value types and temporality listed in Wang et al. 2023. Practical meanings: synthesis.]
- Meaning persists to the end of life, though it may change. Never treat a dying patient as beyond meaning; look for the form meaning can take now.
- The will to meaning is a primary motive. Treat the wish for meaning as healthy and central, not as a symptom to be reduced.
- Freedom to choose one's attitude. Even when circumstances cannot change, invite the patient to notice the stance they take toward them.
- Three sources of meaning: creative (what one gives), experiential (what one receives from love, beauty, nature, humour), attitudinal (the stance taken to suffering and limits). Use these as the map for each session and for reframing.
- Historical source: legacy past, present and future. Life is a story received, lived and passed on; help the patient see continuity rather than a life cut off.
- Responsibility. Being responsible for one's life means responding to what life asks now; help the patient identify what remains theirs to do.
- Identity and temporality. Cancer threatens identity; help separate the self from the illness and locate it across time.
- Meaninglessness is an existential concern, not just depression. Assess and treat depression separately where indicated, but do not pathologise existential questions. [source: Yahoo/TIME feature quoting Breitbart]
- Primarily psychoeducational, with limited emotional processing. Emotional expression is welcomed but kept tied to meaning; the session theme is the anchor (the IMCP protocol states that support and expression occur but are limited by the meaning focus). [source: NCT01323309]
- Structure plus open discussion. Follow the manual's sequence; within it, use open questions and interpretive comments that link what the patient says to sources of meaning. [source: MSK training brochure]
- Presence and non-abandonment. Commit to accompany the patient through illness; gentle questioning creates openings to talk about death. [source: ASCO Post 2015, describing palliative counselling principles Breitbart endorses]
- Facing death turns one toward the life one has lived. Use mortality awareness as a prompt for life review and appreciation, not as a threat. [source: ASCO Post 2015]
- Flexibility for medical illness. Allow gaps, phone sessions and bedside sessions rather than discharging the sick patient. [source: NCT01323309]
4. Intervention inventory
The manuals specify, per session, a didactic segment, one experiential exercise with a set of reflective questions, discussion, and homework. Exact question wording is in the Oxford manuals; questions below are paraphrased from published descriptions, and anything not confirmed is marked [uncertain]. All example language is illustrative. Session numbers are MCGP (IMCP in brackets).
Orientation, introductions and frame (session 1)
- Purpose: Build the frame, alliance and (in groups) cohesion; set expectations that this is a meaning-focused, time-limited course, not open-ended support. [source: NCT01323309; MSK brochure]
- Steps: (1) Welcome; members (or the patient) introduce themselves and say what brought them and what they hope for. (2) Outline the 8 (7) sessions and the didactic-plus-exercise-plus-discussion format. (3) Set ground rules for groups: confidentiality, attendance, phoning if too ill to come [group norms are synthesis]. (4) Explain homework, readings and the optional Legacy Project. (5) Move to the didactic on meaning.
- Example language (illustrative): "Each week we'll take one source of meaning, talk about it briefly, then do a reflection exercise and see what it brings up for you."
- Watch for: Patients expecting a cancer-support group; clarify the focus without dismissing their need to talk about illness. Working sign: patients connect their reasons for coming to the idea of meaning.
Didactic teaching of meaning concepts (every session)
- Purpose: Give a shared vocabulary from Frankl: will to meaning, life retains meaning to the end, freedom to choose one's attitude, the creative, experiential and attitudinal sources, legacy across time; later sessions add identity, responsibility, courage, creativity. [source: NCT01323309; ASCO Post 2015; Wang et al. 2023]
- Steps: (1) A brief (few-minute) explanation of the week's concept in plain language. (2) A concrete everyday example. (3) Link to the coming exercise. (4) Check understanding with an open question. Keep it short so most time goes to the exercise and discussion [synthesis].
- Example language (illustrative): "Frankl suggested that even when we can't change what's happening, we still choose how we meet it. That choice is itself a source of meaning."
- Watch for: Lecturing, or patients hearing "find meaning" as a demand that they feel positive. Working sign: patients start using the terms ("that was an experiential source for me").
Meaningful moments exercise (session 1)
- Purpose: Anchor the concept of meaning in the patient's own life and show that meaning is already present. [source: Yahoo/TIME feature; Zaragoza thesis; Hayashi & Onishi 2021]
- Steps: (1) Invite brief quiet reflection (MCGP-CS opens each exercise with a short meditation). (2) Ask the patient to recall, and write down, one or two moments when life felt particularly meaningful, including times something carried them through a hard period. (3) Each person shares. (4) The therapist reflects which source of meaning each moment illustrates (love, creating something, beauty, overcoming difficulty). (5) Note whether those sources are still available now.
- Example language: Group prompt as reported: recall "one or two experiences or moments when life has felt particularly meaningful to you" [source: Yahoo/TIME feature]. Follow-up (illustrative): "What made that moment matter? Is any part of it still within reach?"
- Watch for: Patients who say nothing has been meaningful, or only grieve lost moments; respond by naming the source and asking where traces of it remain. Working sign: a patient realises a source (e.g. family love) is intact despite illness.
"Who am I?" identity before and after cancer (session 2)
- Purpose: Explore identity, how cancer has affected it, and which identities still give meaning. [source: NCT01323309 session title; Yahoo/TIME feature]
- Steps: (1) Didactic: identity as a source of meaning; illness can strip roles. (2) Ask the patient to answer "Who am I?" with several self-descriptions (the manual reportedly asks for four answers, positive or negative [uncertain]). (3) Ask how cancer has affected each: lost, changed, intact or strengthened. (4) Discuss which identities give the most meaning now and which can still be lived. (5) Some adaptations add a reflection on which identities to prioritise after illness (Chinese MCGP). [source: Wang et al. 2023]
- Example language (illustrative): "You listed 'provider' and said cancer took that. Is any piece of being a provider still something you do, maybe in a different form?"
- Watch for: Identity collapsed into "cancer patient"; grief over lost roles (allow it, then look for continuity). Working sign: patient distinguishes self from illness and names a valued identity still active (e.g. a participant described learning to accept love from others). [source: Yahoo/TIME feature]
Life story: legacy received (session 3; IMCP 3, first part)
- Purpose: Historical source of meaning: the life that has been given, the family, culture and experiences that made the person who they are. [source: NCT01323309; van der Spek et al. 2014; Zaragoza thesis]
- Steps: (1) Didactic: life as a story with three tenses; the past cannot be taken away. (2) Reflective questions about significant memories, relationships and influences, the people who shaped them, proud or formative moments [exact manual questions uncertain]. (3) Patient tells their story; therapist links episodes to values that persist. (4) Assign or continue the Legacy Project.
- Example language (illustrative): "Who most shaped the person you became? What did you take from them that you still carry?"
- Watch for: Painful pasts (abuse, losses) surfacing; acknowledge, contain within the session, and refer for trauma-focused help if needed [synthesis]. Working sign: patient sees continuity between their history and present values.
Legacy lived and legacy to be given (session 4; IMCP 3, second part)
- Purpose: Present and future historical sources: what the patient is doing now, what they have accomplished, what they want to do and to leave. [source: NCT01323309; van der Spek et al. 2014; Zaragoza thesis]
- Steps: (1) Didactic: legacy is not only what is left after death but is lived now. (2) Reflect on accomplishments they are proud of and things still to do, and what they hope to pass on. (3) Link past legacy to present and future contributions. (4) Help select a realistic Legacy Project.
- Example language (illustrative): "If someone you love opened a box of what you've given them, what would you want to be inside?"
- Watch for: Survivors or patients with longer prognosis: frame future in terms of goals, not just what is left behind (MCGP-CS framing). Working sign: concrete intentions for the coming weeks.
Legacy Project (homework across the course; presented in the final session)
- Purpose: A tangible expression of meaning and of how the patient wishes to be remembered. [source: NCT01323309; Yahoo/TIME feature; UCSD slides]
- Steps: (1) Introduce it early as optional. (2) Offer examples: autobiography, artwork, photo album, family history, letters, a recorded talk, mending a relationship [last three illustrative]. (3) Help choose something achievable given energy and prognosis. (4) Review progress at mid-course (UCSD slides note legacy review around session 5) and present it in the last session.
- Example language (illustrative): "It doesn't need to be finished or impressive. It just needs to say something true about what mattered to you."
- Watch for: Perfectionism or overwhelm; shrink the project. Physical decline; allow dictation or a family member's help. Working sign: the patient presents something they are proud of (e.g. a participant brought a woodcut of a heart he would teach his children). [source: Yahoo/TIME feature]
Encountering life's limitations: attitudinal source (session 5; IMCP 4)
- Purpose: Help the patient find meaning in the stance taken toward finitude, loss and suffering that cannot be changed. [source: NCT01323309; van der Spek et al. 2014; Zaragoza thesis]
- Steps: (1) Didactic: Frankl's attitudinal value; limits are part of every life; the freedom that remains is the choice of attitude. (2) Reflect on limitations, losses and obstacles faced before and since cancer and how they were met. (3) In the original advanced-cancer version, reflect on what would make a good or meaningful death and how one would like to be remembered by loved ones (reported in van der Spek et al. 2014; Chinese adaptation also includes a good-death exercise). (4) For survivors, ask instead about present limitations, how to keep living with them, and what to do now that will bring satisfaction later (MCGP-CS). (5) Discuss and link to legacy and remaining choices.
- Example language (illustrative): "You've faced a lot you didn't choose. When you look at how you met those things, what do you see about yourself?" / "If you let yourself think about the end of your life, what would make it feel like a death that fits who you've been?"
- Watch for: This is the most emotionally intense session; check readiness before death-related questions, allow tears, avoid forcing acceptance. Screen for hopelessness, desire for hastened death and suicidal ideation using standard risk assessment and act on it (MCP trials referred patients endorsing suicidal ideation to the PI). Working sign: patient can talk about death with less dread and names something they still choose. [source: NCT01323309; Hayashi & Onishi 2021; synthesis for risk wording]
Creativity, courage and responsibility: creative source (session 6; IMCP 5)
- Purpose: Reconnect with meaning through what the patient creates, does and takes responsibility for, including the courage to own one's life. [source: NCT01323309; OUP IMCP chapter title "Creativity, Courage, and Responsibility"]
- Steps: (1) Didactic: creativity is broad (work, parenting, relationships, deeds, how one lives); responsibility means responding to what life asks now; courage to act despite limits. (2) Reflective questions on responsibilities that matter, tasks still unfinished, and whether they have had the courage to take ownership of their life [exact manual questions uncertain]. (3) Identify one concrete action for the coming week. (4) Review Legacy Project progress.
- Example language (illustrative): "Is there something you'd regret leaving undone? What would be a small first step this week?"
- Watch for: Guilt about unlived potential (Breitbart's writing discusses existential guilt [uncertain]); reframe toward what is still possible. Working sign: concrete action taken or planned.
Love, beauty and humour: experiential source (session 7; IMCP 6)
- Purpose: Reconnect with meaning received from life: love and relationships, beauty in nature and art, humour. [source: NCT01323309; Yahoo/TIME feature; Wang et al. 2023]
- Steps: (1) Didactic: meaning comes not only from doing but from experiencing and connecting. (2) Reflect on ways they connect with life through love, beauty and humour, and what makes them feel alive. (3) Share, including how these remain available despite illness. (4) Homework: deliberately seek one such experience before next session (the Japanese case set homework to notice a calm moment of peace or kindness). [source: Hayashi & Onishi 2021]
- Example language (illustrative): "When did you last laugh properly, or stop because something was beautiful? Could you make space for that this week?"
- Watch for: Anhedonia (check for depression); isolation (problem-solve contact). Working sign: patient reports savouring daily moments (walks, meals with a partner).
Transitions: reflection and hopes for the future (session 8; IMCP 7)
- Purpose: Consolidate, present legacy projects, express hopes, end well. [source: NCT01323309; Yahoo/TIME feature]
- Steps: (1) Review the sources of meaning covered and what each meant for the patient. (2) Reflect on what will live on after them (soul, children, art, an organisation). (3) Legacy Project presentations. (4) Discuss hopes for the future, however near the horizon, and how to keep using the sources of meaning. (5) Feedback, goodbyes, and for the dying patient, arrangements for continued contact or referral.
- Example language (illustrative): "Looking back at our first session, what's different in how you see your life now?"
- Watch for: Grief at ending, or members who have died or deteriorated during the group; name losses openly [synthesis]. Working sign: hope reframed (e.g. from cure to meaningful time).
Homework and readings (all sessions)
- Purpose: Extend reflection between sessions. [source: NCT01323309; Zaragoza thesis]
- Steps: (1) Assign reading from Frankl's Man's Search for Meaning and theme readings. (2) Ask the patient to continue the session's reflection questions or do a small real-life task. (3) Review homework at the start of the next session. (4) Record completion.
- Watch for: Fatigue and cognitive effects of treatment; keep tasks short and optional. Working sign: patient brings examples from the week.
Interpretive comments and meaning-focused discussion (all sessions)
- Purpose: Turn what patients share into recognition of meaning; the MSK training lists interpretive comments among the core techniques. [source: MSK training brochure]
- Steps: (1) Listen with open questions. (2) Reflect content and emotion. (3) Link it explicitly to a source of meaning or to choice and responsibility. (4) Invite the patient to confirm or correct.
- Example language (illustrative): "What I hear is that even on your worst days you still check on your daughter. That sounds like a responsibility that holds a lot of meaning for you."
- Watch for: Imposing meaning; the patient must own the interpretation. Drifting into pure supportive discussion (the trial manuals deliberately separated MCP from supportive therapy).
Brief meditation before exercises (MCGP-CS adaptation)
- Purpose: Help participants settle and process feelings more deeply before reflection. [source: van der Spek et al. 2014]
- Steps: Short guided settling (breath, body, closing eyes), then the reflective questions. Not described in detail in the sources; keep generic [uncertain].
- Watch for: Dyspnoea or pain making breath focus uncomfortable; offer an eyes-open alternative [synthesis].
Involving partners and families (adaptations)
- Purpose: Caregiver and couples versions extend MCP to family members; MCP-EC adds an "essential care" session recalling experiences of being cared for, reflecting on self-care, and building a care plan with a relative and the team. [source: UCSD slides; Zaragoza thesis; Hayashi & Onishi 2021]
- Steps: Follow the same session themes with both partners; split part of later sessions into individual time when needed (as in the Japanese case).
- Watch for: Conflicting needs of patient and caregiver; give each space [synthesis].
5. Handling problems
The sources say little about problem management beyond flexibility for illness, fidelity and referral. Most guidance below is [synthesis], built on MCP's principles; sourced points are tagged.
- Medical deterioration, missed sessions, hospitalisation. Keep the patient in treatment: allow fortnightly spacing within about a 14-week window, phone or teleconference sessions, sessions at another site or bedside. If prognosis shortens sharply, consider a compressed palliative version (3-session MCP-PC). [source: NCT01323309; UCSD slides] In groups, tell members when someone is too ill to attend or has died, and give time to grieve [synthesis].
- Attrition. Group MCGP had notable dropout, mainly from illness, which pushed development of the individual format; individual sessions or phone delivery suit patients who cannot travel. [source: ASCO Post 2015; UCSD slides] [synthesis: offer a switch to IMCP rather than discharge]
- Stuck client: "nothing is meaningful" or "what's the point." Do not argue. Return to the concrete: a single meaningful moment, a person they still care about, what they still notice or enjoy. Name the source the moment illustrates. Assess for major depression and treat it in parallel (medication review by a psychiatrist, as in the Spanish protocol) since depression can block access to meaning. [source: Zaragoza thesis for psychiatric review; rest synthesis]
- Desire for hastened death or suicidal ideation. Assess directly using standard risk assessment (ideation, intent, plan, access, protective factors), involve the oncology/palliative team, refer urgently when indicated, and include lethal-means counselling (secure storage or removal of stockpiled medication or firearms) where relevant. Distinguish this from a calm wish not to prolong dying. Trials referred patients with suicidal ideation or very high distress to the PI. [source: NCT01323309 for referral; risk steps synthesis]
- Overwhelm in attitudinal/death sessions. Slow down; ask permission before death questions; let the patient choose the depth; return to a source of present meaning before ending; schedule a check-in. In the survivor version, focus on present limitations instead of death. [source: van der Spek et al. 2014; Hayashi & Onishi 2021 for readiness; rest synthesis]
- Client wants to talk only about medical problems or feelings. Validate briefly, then link back: "How does this connect to what matters most to you?" The protocol limits emotional processing to the meaning focus. If needs are mainly practical, family or spiritual, refer (social work, family clinic, chaplaincy, palliative care), as in the trial's referral map. [source: NCT01323309; synthesis for wording]
- Religious or spiritual material. MCP is not religious, but faith is often a source of meaning; follow the patient's framework and involve chaplaincy for specifically religious needs [synthesis; the trial referred spiritual concerns to pastoral care].
- Toxic positivity or premature acceptance. If the patient says they've found meaning while clearly distressed, gently name both; MCP does not require cheerfulness [synthesis].
- Non-adherence to homework or Legacy Project. Keep tasks optional and small; offer dictation, photos or a family helper; reframe the project as a conversation rather than an object [synthesis].
- Group problems: dominant members, comparison of prognosis, member deaths. Use structure: round-robin sharing per exercise, time limits, and the theme as anchor; acknowledge differences in prognosis openly; mark a member's death in the group with a short remembrance [synthesis].
- Ruptures (feeling lectured or that meaning is imposed). Acknowledge, cut didactics, and ask what fits for them; meaning must be discovered by the patient, not supplied [synthesis grounded in Frankl's principle of personal meaning].
- Therapist drift and burnout. Use the manual's session checklists, supervision and booster training; MSK runs a training programme with follow-up consultation. Working with dying patients repeatedly warrants peer support [source: NCT01323309; MSK brochure; burnout point synthesis].
- Cultural fit. Adaptations have changed wording (e.g. Chinese version replaced "legacy" with "story" and "achievement" with "satisfaction", removed the session-1 exercise). Adjust terms to the patient's culture. [source: Wang et al. 2023]
Sources
Sources:
- Trial of Individual Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer Patients (NCT01323309 protocol, MSKCC)
- MSK Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy Training Program brochure (2021)
- How to Find Meaning in the Face of Death (TIME feature via Yahoo News)
- Potential power of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in patients with advanced cancer (ASCO Post, 2015)
- van der Spek et al. 2014, MCGP for cancer survivors trial protocol, BMC Psychiatry 14:22
- van der Spek, Leiden University thesis chapter
- Wang et al. 2023, MCGP among Chinese cancer patients, Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Hayashi & Onishi 2021, meaning-centered couples psychotherapy case report, Palliative & Supportive Care
- Quílez Bielsa 2024, Psicoterapia centrada en el sentido integrando el cuidado esencial, doctoral thesis, Universidad de Zaragoza
- Marco et al. 2025, Psicoterapia Centrada en el Sentido para pacientes con cáncer: serie de casos, Revista de Psicoterapia
- Yang, UCSD geriatric psychiatry grand rounds slides (2022)
- Oxford Academic: MCGP manual, chapter 1 abstract page and IMCP manual, session 5 chapter abstract page (abstracts only)
Further reading (not drawn on):
- Breitbart, W., & Poppito, S. R. (2014). Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Treatment Manual. Oxford University Press.
- Breitbart, W., & Poppito, S. R. (2014). Individual Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Treatment Manual. Oxford University Press.
- Breitbart, W. (Ed.) (2017). Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy in the Cancer Setting: Finding Meaning and Hope in the Face of Suffering. Oxford University Press.
- Applebaum, A. J., et al. Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Cancer Caregivers: Therapist Manual and Caregiver Workbook. Oxford University Press.
- Frankl, V. E. (1946/2006). Man's Search for Meaning. Beacon Press.
- Rosenfeld, B., et al. (2017). Meaning-centered psychotherapy in the palliative care setting (MCP-PC). (cited via UCSD slides) [uncertain]
[uncertain] Exact experiential-exercise questions and the session-by-session didactic scripts are in the manuals and are not drawn on here.